And the Surgeon General of Florida is more qualified than you, and eminently more qualified than her. What’s your point?
1 Like
Which was released with incomplete data, which is why a judge had to order the FDA to release all of it. I’m not sure what you’re even trying to say?
That you clearly didn’t read her breakdown of the data and you don’t care because you want to believe the Florida report.
1 Like
No it wasn’t. The court order has nothing to do with the published study.
1 Like
This is demonstrably false, and you know it.
The point of the thread was to discuss how vaccine mandates would fare when going against the recommendation of a state Surgeon General. I didn’t expect people to frantically cling to things that have been disproven for years now in order to justify their fear based decision making and moral cowardice.
Don’t get your heart rate up over it.
Then demonstrate it. Where in the court order does it mention anything about missing data from the study?
1 Like
When the recommendation by the state surgeon general isn’t backed by data then why does it matter?
1 Like
What do you think has “been disproven for years now”? Nothing that you’ve mentioned yet in this thread.
1 Like
‘A federal judge in Texas on Thursday ordered the Food and Drug Administration to make public the data it relied on to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, imposing a dramatically accelerated schedule that should result in the release of all information within about eight months.’
???
If this wasn’t started in the Scuttlebutt section it would have been closed down awhile ago. As it has boiled down to a “Yes it is, No it isn’'t” rebuttal, I think it is time.
2 Likes