Breath taken. Now what? My original post correctly pointed out Freighterman’s post didn’t violate TOS not the FAQ, not even close. And a moderator deleted the post with no comment or email to explain the reason or specific rule in the TOS violated.
Here’s what was also in the post—if politics is an issue—and it is—-and moderators have an issue, delete the Scuttlebutt thread. It serves no purpose anyway save for ad service. The lines are well drawn and the voters will ultimately decide the winners.
To all you potential conservatives are censored folks—maybe not so much, hunh?
Ha!! …Affordable access?..Ha! I have 3 neighbors that are contractors. They almost went under with Obamacare. My SIU insurance was ruled a Cadillac plan and had to be re-adjusted. Ha!
You mean those things that a Republican controlled Congress didn’t care about until it was convenient and had full knowledge and approved of at the time? Yeah, I’m familiar with it. Did you have a relevant link to any reliable media stories to back up any implications?
Oh. And they are all BS. Unlike the President’s ongoing nepotism and corruption involving his own family and properties. Google those if such things offend you.
Hahahaha… Come on now… You gotta be just trolling now… You’re like the guy who wouldn’t believe the Greta/George Soros photo was fake despite like 4 sites that showed it was.
Just say what you mean: Can I produce a CNN/MSNBC/Salon/etc. sourced piece that called out the Bidens for the blatant corruption?
No need for you to be confused. The issue is the fact that Biden suffers from occasional brain freeze and will turn 80 within a couple of years of assuming power, if he does. At his age, his mental acumen is diminishing. Even if he gets the reins, a second term is unlikely. That doesn’t paint a rosy future.
So you’re saying that a Republican controlled congress that was in place during VP Biden’s tenure and into a Republican President couldn’t be bothered to investigate corruption? Let’s see what the undecided voters think about that.
And I think calling someone a troll is getting personal, you should probably not do that. Anchorman, don’t you think calling someone a troll is personal? I didn’t refer to you as anything but Super Moderator, your title, and you thought that was personal.
Anything is better than the mental acumen currently on display, surrounded by enablers. At least Dem Administrations hold themselves accountable.
I mean, Trump went on a nationalized TV address following two tragedies to console the nation following the shootings in Dayton and El Paso and referred to the shootings in Toledo!!! Mental acumen concerns? You’re kidding me.
Why would they? Did they have 67 votes in the Senate to remove him? What house of representatives would be stupid enough to waste their time on… Wait…
Someone who says “post a link to back up your claim (but it’ll be BS)” is trolling. You don’t like being called a troll? Then stop trolling.
Crying to the moderator? Seriously? Do you have a donkey* suit you wear because you are a living incarnation of today’s Democratic Party and might as well have the mascot uniform to go with it.
*-notice I said donkey and not jackass which required a large level of restraint
So you’re saying Republican controlled Congress wouldn’t try to convince anyone and that congressional oversight is simply partisan? Gee, guess that a Bill Clinton impeachment was a screwup then hunh?
it’s not like you know why the Republican controlled Congress didn’t even both trying to investigate Biden for political reasons. I mean you make an airtight argument about their pragmatism due to lack of 2/3 control of the senate stopping them from investigating Biden when VP… but they did investigate SecState Clinton under the same conditions so… I mean there was no point, since they couldn’t convict as you note. And they don’t have 2/3rd control now so why bother investigating Burrisma… excuse me Burisma, now? Sorry Burrisma is the name for Senator Burr’s corruption.
You talking about Bengazi or her illegal server? Her multitude of transgressions are hard to keep straight. I’ll add “not considering incompetence that results in the loss of American lives during a terrorist attack a big deal” to the list of reasons to dislike and distrust the ilk on your team. (For the record, it was already there)
I’m talking about Biden who walks the land unindicted or convicted; but sure, for her (also walking the earth unconvicted or indicted) I guess I’m talking about the ones she testified for 11 hours to that led to no indictments or convictions as opposed to when Trump WH refused any testimony at all in a case that had multiple indictments, and convictions.
Say where are the President’s personal lawyer, campaign manager right now? Which jail was that?
You mention Clinton…I respond and ask a follow up… Then you say you’re talking about Biden… arguing in circles is another trolling behavior. I don’t know why I’m wasting my time. You’re like a male version of Rachel Maddow anyway so what’s the point?
All this is off the topic of this thread anyway so if you want to discuss what a disaster a Biden presidency will be then start a new thread.
I know why you’re wasting it. Cause the President was impeached, his lawyer in jail, his campaign manager in jail, and he doesn’t know the difference between Toledo and Dayton. Oh and he said he wouldn’t golf, but golfs all the time. But Biden isn’t in jail, neither is Clinton and America has never been less respected in the world than now.
As for Maddow, I never watch, but I guess you do, so that’s something I can’t comment on.
