kom·pro·mat
/ˌkämprəˈmät/
noun
compromising information collected for use in blackmailing, discrediting, or manipulating someone, typically for political purposes.
Example: Russians getting away with putting bounties on American soldiers.
In 2016 the DOJ began learning of ties between Russian spies and Trump’s team. Your assertion, apparently, is that the DOJ shouldn’t have investigated then. That’s your opinion. My opinion is that when Americans deal with foreign spies at ANY time they should investigated, but when it involves an election, POTUS should pull out all stops to defend the Republic.
Right now, at this instant, our intelligence services are saying that foreign governments are working full force to undermine our elections. To cause us to lose faith in our electoral process. At the same time POTUS45 is saying we should lose faith in our electoral process. Kompromat, stupidity, or just plan evil?–take your choice.
Did you read the report? Did you read the words of the Republican-led investigation? Here they are again:
Page was a subject of interest to… Russian intelligence, which had in previous years interacted with Page. …Prior to joining the Trump Campaign, Page communicated with, met, and provided private business information to Russian SVR [an intelligence service] officers in New York, whom the FBI believed were acting in a manner consistent with attempts to recruit Page .
None of that had to do with the Steele Dossier. But because the FBI looked at the Steele dossier, you apparently discount all the connections the FBI found between Page and the Russians on their own.
In a criminal investigation there are leads and false leads. There are witnesses and liars. Your belief, apparently, is that a false lead and a liar negates all the good leads and witnesses.