$37.65

[QUOTE=Jetryder223;175381]Confirmed.

This is much worst than I imagined. Domestic energy production is on life support. Will remain so for the foreseeable future.[/QUOTE]

That may very well be a typo.

Here’s a similar article from CNBC: http://www.cnbc.com/2014/12/01/falling-oil-hurts-irans-hand-in-nuclear-talks.html

“Another plus for Iran is that it only costs the National Iranian Oil Company between $10 and $15 to produce a barrel of oil, so even now, the energy business is still profitable.”

Cheap, but not a buck a barrel.

[QUOTE=c.captain;176136]you do realize that the day after the Congress lifted the ban on exporting US produced crude the benchmark West Texas Intermediate price went up three bucks a barrel?

Merry Christmas to Conoco Phillips[/QUOTE]

We all knew that was going to happen. WTI was trading below the world benchmark Brent Crude because of the export restrictions so lifting the restrictions allowed WTI to rise the the market level.

no, that’s just Jeaux boss fucking us, it has nothing to do with the market.

Snake oil maybe, but who can say? From BBC

Oil producers’ group Opec has said it expects oil prices to recover to $70 a barrel by 2020. Prices have fallen from more than $110 a barrel in the summer of 2014 to less than $37 a barrel now due to oversupply and slowing demand.

But Opec said oil prices would begin to rise next year and, longer term, would rise due to higher exploration costs.

It expects the market share of Opec producers to shrink by 2020 as rivals prove more resilient than expected.

The group currently accounts for about 30% of the world’s oil production, down from 50% in the 1970s.

Part of the reason for this decline is the emergence of vast quantities of shale oil produced in the US. This has also been factor in pushing down the price of oil to 11-year lows.

In its World Oil Outlook report, Opec said it expected supply growth from US shale to slow dramatically next year, as producers struggled to cope with such low prices.

Opec’s strategy this year has been to allow prices to fall by maintaining production in the hope that, eventually, US shale producers will be forced out of business.

Another factor in low prices, Opec said, was weaker economic growth, particularly in developing economies. It highlighted China, where the “economy seems to be maturing and growth is decelerating faster than previously expected”.

Price rebound

The report also highlighted the “huge reductions” in spending on exploration and production by the industry as a whole due to low oil prices.

These cutbacks will ultimately see supply fall, it said, putting upward pressure on prices.

Another longer-term factor pushing prices up, Opec said, was higher exploration costs, as companies are forced to look harder for oil as traditional supply sources dwindle. Deep water drilling, for example, is considerably more expensive than drilling onshore.

Finally, Opec said population and economic growth would see demand for energy rise by almost a half by 2040, increasing demand for oil.

Opec was founded in 1960 by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.

These countries have since been joined by Qatar (1961), Indonesia (1962), Libya (1962), the United Arab Emirates (1967), Algeria (1969), Nigeria (1971), Ecuador (1973), Gabon (1975) and Angola (2007).

all I know is the price at the pump went up 20cents a gallon overnight…like I said, merry Christmas to Conoco Phillips

[B]Oil Companies Rush to Exploit End of U.S. Crude Export Ban[/B]

December 24, 2015 by Reuters

By Valerie Volcovici and Catherine Ngai

Dec 23 (Reuters) – U.S. energy group Enterprise and oil trader Vitol raced to exploit the end of a 40-year ban on most U.S. crude exports, the first of many firms eager to “stress test” last week’s historic opening.

Despite a sudden change in global oil market conditions that many oil traders say has eliminated the economic advantage of shipping domestic crude far abroad, some companies that have long lobbied for the change in policy may be eager to show that their effort was not in vain, according to some experts.

Houston-based pipeline group Enterprise Products Partners LP said in a statement it will provide pipeline and marine terminal services to load a 600,000-barrel cargo of domestic light crude oil scheduled for the first week of January.

An Enterprise spokesman said that the cargo belongs to Vitol, which will decide on a delivery destination. A spokeswoman for Vitol could not immediately be reached for comment on where the oil was going. The company did not provide any details on the pricing of the cargo.

“We are excited to announce our first contract to export U.S. crude oil, which to our knowledge may be the first export cargo of U.S. crude oil from the Gulf Coast in almost 40 years,” said A.J. “Jim” Teague, chief operating officer of Enterprise.

Some oil traders expressed surprise at the news, saying that with the U.S. crude futures contract trading consistently above Brent for the first time since the shale era began five years ago, exports of most varieties would not be economical.

Even so, others are queuing up. Pioneer Natural Resources , an independent producer that along with Enterprise received the green light from the U.S. government last year to ship a lightly processed form of ultra-light crude to test the ban, expects to commence exports by mid-2016, it said in a statement.

“The company has been actively working with its midstream partners to secure export facilities along the U.S. Gulf Coast, which will maximize the company’s crude marketing flexibility going forward,” the statement said, adding that Europe, Asia and Latin America are potential markets for U.S. crude.

ABRUPT END

On Friday, Congress passed and President Barack Obama signed into law a $1.8 trillion government spending and tax relief bill that included repealing the four-decade-old export ban, which barred shipments to countries other than Canada. The Department of Commerce issued an official notice on Tuesday saying companies no longer need to apply for licenses to export crude.

In the coming weeks, companies are likely to “stress test” where export opportunities will be, said George Baker, executive director of the Producers for American Crude Oil Exports, which led the successful lobbying effort in Washington to lift the ban.

Pressure from oil producers to scrap the restrictions intensified over recent years, as U.S. crude oil prices plunged to as much as $25 a barrel below global prices due to a build-up of swelling U.S. shale production caused by infrastructure bottlenecks as well as the export ban.

But that gap has vanished in recent weeks amid growing evidence that U.S. production has shifted into reverse this year as plummeting prices caused drilling to dry up, while output overseas is still swelling, with Iran poised to increase sales as sanctions are lifted next year.

On Wednesday, U.S. oil futures were trading at a premium to global Brent all the way to June.

Jacob Dweck, an attorney with law firm Sutherland that represents oil producers, said some producers and shippers “are interested in flying the flag of exports … They want to create the new reality of exports.”

But analysts said even if a handful of companies announce deals in coming weeks, it does not signal a bigger trend.

“It’s universally agreed in the short term that we won’t see a flood of ships leaving for foreign ports because the economics aren’t right,” said Sandy Fielden, director of energy analytics at RBN Energy.

[QUOTE=c.captain;176155]all I know is the price at the pump went up 20cents a gallon overnight…like I said, merry Christmas to Conoco Phillips[/QUOTE]

Was there a winter blend change-over? The price appears to still be going down here in the swamp. I’m enjoying $1.42 a gallon gas but also my COP and XOM dividends.

https://www.rt.com/news/326812-yemen-saudi-oil-missile/

[QUOTE=follow40;176135]In the short-medium term the only thing that will drive up the oil price is if The Donald gets elected and rubs the House of Saud the wrong way. Or if there is an “arab spring” in Saudi, if enough of their rebels can avoid getting crucified and/or having their heads chopped off before they can gain some meaningful ground.[/QUOTE]

Well, there’s always Putin… Wars are expensive. Sooner or later he’ll have to apply kaboom-o-nomics to get Russia out of the ME. Even though they are BFF’s with Syria. Didn’t he say he “hoped” it wouldn’t be necessary to use thermonuclear firecrackers against the thugs wearing basketball shoes? Or something to that effect… Sounds like there’s a plan on a drawing board somewhere…

[QUOTE=injunear;176158]Was there a winter blend change-over? The price appears to still be going down here in the swamp. I’m enjoying $1.42 a gallon gas but also my COP and XOM dividends.[/QUOTE]

Most likely that’s it because there was no price change where I am either.

[QUOTE=c.captain;176136]you do realize that the day after the Congress lifted the ban on exporting US produced crude the benchmark West Texas Intermediate price went up three bucks a barrel?

Merry Christmas to Conoco Phillips[/QUOTE]

They did stipulate this USA crude which previously was prohibited from export for national security purposes could only be exported out of the USA on ships manned by US mariners, right?

[QUOTE=tengineer1;176207]They did stipulate this USA crude which previously was prohibited from export for national security purposes could only be exported out of the USA on ships manned by US mariners, right?[/QUOTE]

Hahahahahahaaaa!

[QUOTE=Bayrunner;176212]Hahahahahahaaaa![/QUOTE]

But, but…they are the job creators. They could have created a lot of jobs for some of the hundreds of mariners out of a job.

vote for no incumbent !!

[QUOTE=tengineer1;176207]They did stipulate this USA crude which previously was prohibited from export for national security purposes could only be exported out of the USA on ships manned by US mariners, right?[/QUOTE]

While I certainly support this position, what US Flag crude carriers are available for cargo right now? Will Chevron, Sea River, BP/ARCO bust loose their committed tankers or reflag their FOC fleet?

[QUOTE=cmakin;176222]While I certainly support this position, what US Flag crude carriers are available for cargo right now? Will Chevron, Sea River, BP/ARCO bust loose their committed tankers or reflag their FOC fleet?[/QUOTE]

If the law allowing US resources to be sold to other countries had stated that such resources must be transported by US mariners on US ships the oil companies would have found a way to build or reflag the ships. Since they got the law written without that stipulation they can have their cake and eat it too…as usual. There are thousands of mariners out of work due to low oil prices but it never crossed the mind of the employees of the oil companies [your congressmen] to include them in the law.The law was written to benefit the few at the top that pay the bribes and write the laws.
vote NO incumbent

[QUOTE=tengineer1;176298]If the law allowing US resources to be sold to other countries had stated that such resources must be transported by US mariners on US ships the oil companies would have found a way to build or reflag the ships. Since they got the law written without that stipulation they can have their cake and eat it too…as usual. There are thousands of mariners out of work due to low oil prices but it never crossed the mind of the employees of the oil companies [your congressmen] to include them in the law.The law was written to benefit the few at the top that pay the bribes and write the laws.
vote NO incumbent[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I go into the primaries to fire people. . .

looks like all the greenlighted projects are wrapping up and not many now moving ahead in 2016 so expect a further rolling back of vessel charters worldwide

[B]Offshore Prospects for 2016: Playing the Waiting Game?[/B]

By MarEx 2015-12-28

By Mark Adeosun, Douglas-Westwood London

This year, the offshore oil and gas industry has had to come to terms with the worst downturn for more than a decade. With commodity prices plummeting to an eleven-year low in December, it is time to reflect on the year gone by and consider the outlook for the year to come.

Offshore rig markets still have a lot to digest before recovery. Rig day rates have plummeted as a function of significant oversupply. Many of these rigs were ordered in the previous up-cycle, but have only recently entered the fleet at a time when the appetite to drill is poor.

The number of offshore oil and gas discoveries made in 2015 dropped by 60 percent and 45 percent when compared to 2013 and 2014 respectively. The market for newbuilds has evaporated, and, such is the extent of the oversupply, rates are unlikely to recover any time soon and rig owners around the world will continue to defer the delivery of new rigs and consider scrappage of non-competitive units.

A backlog of subsea orders has supported high levels of offshore installation activity in 2015 – for example, major pipelines such as Ichthys and Polarled were installed this year. Subsea installation activities in West Africa and Latin America have also continued to thrive due to Petrobras’ commitment to deepwater production – all despite considerable financial constraints. Large deepwater developments such as Total’s Egina field and Shell’s continued development of the Bonga field are highlights among capital-intensive projects offshore West Africa in 2015.

However, it is important to note that backlogs are falling rapidly – only a few projects have been sanctioned this year. Of these, notable examples of fields receiving Final Investment Decisions over the past year include Statoil’s Johan Sverdrup field, Shell’s Appomattox field and BP’s Shah Deniz Phase 2 subsea development.

Douglas-Westwood (DW) believes subsea installation activity is yet to bottom out, with current backlog disguising the reality of the industry. A decline of at least 15 percent is forecast in global subsea tree installations next year.

This undeniably bleak assessment should be tempered with acknowledgement that, whilst it is often hard to be positive in the depths of a downturn, current oil price levels are not sustainable.

So when should we expect a recovery? Most industry observers expect that the supply overhang that has supressed prices through 2015 will linger well into 2016. However, there are signs that the supply / demand gap may start to narrow towards the end of next year. The latest IEA Oil Market Report projects that oil demand will increase by 1.2 mmbbl/d in 2016 whilst our most recent Drilling & Production analysis highlights net additions of only 250 kbbl/d.

In summary, there is reason to see the light at the end of the tunnel, but we should expect that it might take time to reach it.

      • Updated - - -

I wonder what unionized Norwegian offshore mariners get when they are laid off? I bet a whole lotta months of pay…

[B]Norwegian Offshore Firms Diverge With Contracts and Cutbacks
[/B]

By MarEx 2015-12-28 16:03:33

Atlantic Offshore has announced a new nine month firm / two year option charter contract for its response vessel Ocean West. Talisman Sinopec Energy UK Limited, a joint venture between Repsol-owned Talisman and Chinese state-owned firm Sinopec, has hired the vessel for response coverage on its North Sea platforms.

Atlantic also announced December 2 that Norway’s Statoil had exercised a six month contract option for the Ocean King, expiring in July 2016. There is an additional one year option remaining.

Earlier in the year, Atlantic negotiated the sale of its 1972-built Ocean Sun to a buyer out of the North Sea region, for a price the company described as above book and above broker valuation, and took delivery of newbuild MRV Ocean Falcon in her place.

Atlantic’s home office is outside of Bergen, Norway. The firm operates over 20 ships in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean, and its portfolio is diversified with the inclusion of both platform supply vessels (PSVs) and multirole response vessels (MRVs).

Separately, Ulsteinvik-based Norwegian firm Island Offshore has reached an agreement for staff pay cuts with its 1200 employees as it works to stave off layoffs.

The news follows on the company’s earlier efforts to reduce payroll overhead in a weak offshore market. On August 1, the firm reduced working hours for all of its onshore employees by 10 percent.

“It is important to us to stand together in this. This way we also retain the significant competence we have built up over time. We know that we are asking for a lot of our employees, hence it is very nice to see that everyone supports this solution,” said Håvard Ulstein, the firm’s managing director.

As at other firms, Island has also cold-stacked vessels and delayed newbuild deliveries due to low demand. With the December 2 layup of the Island Commander, Island Offshore has seven vessels tied up at dock, including three off market for the winter season.

[QUOTE=tengineer1;176207]They did stipulate this USA crude which previously was prohibited from export for national security purposes could only be exported out of the USA on ships manned by US mariners, right?[/QUOTE]

I asked that back when they were still considering it. At least they included (or tried to?) a rule like that in the LNG export law.

Unemployment benefits in Norway has nothing to do with the Unions or the Employer. It is a Government benefit and applies to all who are employed, or rather has been employed in Norway, or on Norwegian flag vessels (NOR)for a certain length of time. It is based on your previous pay and paid out only if you are actively seeking work through the system, but NAV is fairly flexible in it’s interpretation.

Here is some basic information from NAV: https://www.nav.no/en/Home/Benefits+and+services/Unemployment+benefits

Here is comparison to other countries: http://www.forbes.com/2008/06/27/unemployment-benefits-world-forbeslife-cx_mw_0627worldunemployment.html