Yes. At least I’m working to reintroduce DDT as a mosquito repellent in malarial countries (against the active resistance of environmentalists … like you?). I’ve crewed on voyages to malarial zones to carry scientists who study those mosquitoes.
So you have malaria? But couldn’t care less about removing this scourge from the world by easy means? Strange. I would have thought you might be more interested in saving lives today than altering the climate in a century.
And don’t tell me malaria is a disease which will become more prevalent in a warming world. The best set of historical malaria records over many decades were maintained in Finland.
I couldn’t care less that you have been exposed to malarial conditions. So have I. What I’m criticising you for is forever advocating crazy ideas to reduce CO2 presumably towards some impossible end in a century when you could be saving lives today. I’m making the simple comparison of cost benefit analysis. You can do more good for less cost/effort helping the world’s poor than you can by trying to change the world’s temperature when we are all going to be dead anyway.
And there are many more things of higher priority than zero emissions shipping. Competent shipping would be a start.