Here is MSC’s take on the 2050 goal:
EU is aiming for Zero Emission. “Fit for 55”:
Some see nothing but problems and expenses with the aim for zero emission shipping.
Other seen great opportunities:
Since nobody else has posted I take the chance of refreshing this thread.
It is NOT going to be easy:
DNV introduce new “Abate-ready” Notation for vessels that doesn’t come under IMO emission rules:
Coming to a Lift boat near you soon??
Somebody is spending money to do something:
Is it ONLY to “save the planet”?
No, it also safe money for the company.
jimrr
9
this whole bs is going to drive us back to sails!
as it is it just raises the costs for consumers exponentially.
ombugge
10
Not only Maersk is contributing to the 2050 goal:
ombugge
11
Not IMO but still Net Zero 2050 coal.
ombugge
12
Major players in shipping wants to have clear guidance:
But how can there be any when:
There are other obstacles too:
ombugge
15
It is soon time for another MEPC meeting
ombugge
17
EU Innovation Fund is key to support the transition to zero-emission waterborne transport
https://www.ecsa.eu/index.php/news/eu-innovation-fund-key-support-transition-zero-emission-waterborne-transport
ombugge
19
EU is hot on the subject of GHG emission from shipping: