[QUOTE=Capt. Phoenix;117733]Yes, of course it counts as normal mate time. My point was that you cannot get a Master license with only that time, because time as SDPO isn’t time as chief mate. Also, I think you need to have a certain percentage of time on an actual ship, not just on an MODU.[/QUOTE]
mr. phoenix, yes, i covered no more than 50% of time as less than c/m would be considered toward upgarde to Master.
from: MARINE SAFETY MANUAL, VOLUME III, MARINE INDUSTRY PERSONNEL
CHAPTER 10: LICENSES FOR DECK OFFICERS
How is sea service credited for Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODUs)?
● Service
Service aboard self-propelled, dynamically positioned MODUs, which are not anchored or otherwise bottom bearing, will be credited without restriction toward all grades of unlimited deck licenses in the same manner as conventional vessels. All other MODU service will be credited in accordance with 46 CFR 11.211©. (MSM Vol III, Chapter 10, Section B(5))
● Licenses
Holders of licenses as master, oceans, any gross tons do not have to take any additional examinations when obtaining an endorsement as offshore installation manager (OIM). Holders of such master licenses must however, meet the sea service requirements for the OIM endorsement and complete the required Coast Guard approved training courses. (MSM, Chapter 10 (H), and 46 CFR 11.470, 11.903(b) (1))
Service on mobile offshore drilling units is creditable for raise of grade of officer endorsement. Evidence of one year’s service as mate or equivalent while holding a license as third mate, or as engineering officer of the watch or equivalent while holding an officer endorsement or license as third assistant engineer, is acceptable for a raise of grade to second mate or second assistant engineer, respectively; however, any subsequent raises of grade of unlimited, non- restricted officer licenses or endorsements must include a minimum of six months of service on conventional vessels. (46 CFR 11.211©)
5. Service On MODUs.
Service aboard self-propelled, dynamically positioned MODUs which are not anchored or otherwise bottom bearing will be credited without restriction towards all grades of unlimited deck licenses in the same manner as conventional vessels. All other MODU service will be credited in accordance with 46 CFR 10.211©.
i wish i was wrong, but DP semi-subs and drillships have been classified as convetional vessels. otherwise, noble, ensco, etc. wouldn’t be hiring brand new 3/Ms who can never get c/m let alone master license without leaving to work on box boats, tankers, and then coming back.
the bottom of this was dated 4/25/2013.
the IADC has their bases covered. when i get home i will try to dig up that reply letter from NMC/USCG to an IADC big wig. if it don’t find it here first.
I do know (personally) at least 3 if not 5 drilling mates with master’s licenses who have never been anything but a DP and non-DP MODU mate, as well as a few Master/OIM on DP drillers who never been anything other than DP and non- DP MODU mate.
I see that you were a participant in similar thread started well over 2 years ago that has been inactive for a good 6 months. I’m pretty sure that this is the same letter i have at my house.
It reads:
Mr. Cavo, can we revisit this? This affects a lot of people.
The letter I have is dated 02 May 2000, from Captain Boothe (NMC-4C) to the IADC. In there he cites MSM III.10.B.5 which hasn’t changed… “Service aboard self-propelled, dynamically positioned MODUs which are not anchored or otherwise bottom bearing will be credited without restriction towards all grades of unlimited deck licenses in the same manner as conventional vessels. All other MODU service will be credited in accordance with 46 CFR 10.211©.”
He goes on to write “I consider a self propelled, dynamically positioned MODU, maintaining station by means of dynamic positioning, to be “underway” even if connected to the seabed by drill pipe or marine drilling riser. Such service will be credited without restriction toward license upgrade for both deck and engineering licenses.”
how do you feel about this?