Methane releases in the arctic

Study: Arctic seafloor methane releases double previous estimatesBy Marmian Grimes
[LEFT]November 27, 2013
Wednesday PM[/LEFT]
(SitNews) - The seafloor off the coast of Northern Siberia is releasing more than twice the amount of methane as previously estimated, according to new research results published in the Nov. 24 edition of the journal Nature Geoscience.
The East Siberian Arctic Shelf is venting at least 17 teragrams of the methane into the atmosphere each year. A teragram is equal to 1 million tons.

Methane burns as it escapes through a hole in the ice in a lagoon above the East Siberian Arctic Shelf.
Photo courtesy of Natalia Shakhova
“It is now on par with the methane being released from the arctic tundra, which is considered to be one of the major sources of methane in the Northern Hemisphere,” said Natalia Shakhova, one of the paper’s lead authors and a scientist at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. “Increased methane releases in this area are a possible new climate-change-driven factor that will strengthen over time.”
Methane is a greenhouse gas more than 30 times more potent than carbon dioxide. On land, methane is released when previously frozen organic material decomposes. In the seabed, methane can be stored as a pre-formed gas or asmethane hydrates. As long as the subsea permafrost remains frozen, it forms a cap, effectively trapping the methane beneath. However, as the permafrost thaws, it develops holes, which allow the methane to escape. These releases can be larger and more abrupt than those that result from decomposition.
The findings are the latest in an ongoing international research project led by Shakhova and Igor Semiletov, both researchers at the UAF International Arctic Research Center. Their twice-yearly arctic expeditions have revealed that the subsea permafrost in the area has thawed much more extensively than previously thought, in part due to warming water near the bottom of the ocean. The warming has created conditions that allow the subsea methane to escape in much greater amounts than their earlier models estimated. Frequent storms in the area hasten its release into the atmosphere, much in the same way stirring a soda releases the carbonation more quickly.

Methane bubbles collect under the ice.
Photo courtesy of Natalia Shakhova
“Results of this study represent a big step forward toward improving our understanding of methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf,” said Shakhova. She noted that while the ESAS is unusual in its expansive and shallow nature, the team’s findings there speak to the need for further exploration of the subsea Arctic. “I believe that all other arctic shelf areas are significantly underestimated and should be paid very careful attention to.”
The East Siberian Arctic Shelf is a methane-rich area that encompasses more than 2 million square kilometers of seafloor in the Arctic Ocean. It is more than three times as large as the nearby Siberian wetlands, which have been considered the primary Northern Hemisphere source of atmospheric methane. Previous estimates performed for the ESAS suggested that the area was releasing 8 teragrams of methane into the atmosphere yearly.
During field expeditions, the research team used a variety of techniques—including sonar and visual images of methane bubbles in the water, air and water sampling, seafloor drilling and temperature readings—to determine the conditions of the water and permafrost, as well as the amount of methane being released.

Members of the scientific field expedition drill through the ice and into the seafloor of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf.
Photo courtesy of Natalia Shakhova
Methane is an important factor in global climate change, because it so effectively traps heat. As conditions warm, global research has indicated that more methane is released, which then stands to further warm the planet. Scientists call this phenomenon a positive feedback loop.
“We believe that the release of methane from the Arctic, and in particular this part of the Arctic, could impact the entire globe,” Shakhova said. “We are trying to understand the actual contribution of the ESAS to the global methane budget and how that will change over time.”
Shakhova and Semiletov are also affiliated with the Pacific Oceanological Institute at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch, as are research team members Anatoly Salyuk, Denis Kosmach and Denis Chernykh. Other members of the research team include Dmitry Nicolsky of the UAF Geophysical Institute; co-lead author Ira Leifer of the Marine Sciences Institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara and Bubbleology Research International; Valentin Sergienko of the Institute of Chemistry at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch; Chris Stubbs of the Marine Sciences Institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara; Vladimir Tumskoy of Moscow State University; and Örjan Gustafsson of the Department of Applied Environmental Science and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University.

Source of News:
University of Alaska Fairbanks
www.uaf.edu

as sea temps rise in the arctic ocean, the volume of shallow subsea hydrates starting to release methane is growing rapidly as well!

So the question that begs to be asked is Global Warming (now referred to as Climate Change) man made or a natural cycle?

I question whether the emerging global carbon trading scheme is just that - a contrived scheme to redistribute wealth.

who, blind after money, is responsible for the global warming

There is no suach a thing lik eglobal warming. Just look at the winter this year United States !

I think Al Gore Got it wrong. Global warming is an incorrect statement. Global Change is more accurate. Swings in Temps and climate shifts. There will be a correction i’m sure. Heat on the earth is directed more my solar output and atmosphere density. One good volcanic eruption and zap. You’ve got a “summer that never was” Or a Mini IceAge when NY Harbor freezes… Tell me what the solar output was back in the last ice age, Or better yet back when there was no arctic zones. Yes that’s correct. Once Antarctica was free of Ice and so was the North Slope. There is agricultural evidence of this. - Seeds and plants under the ice. Oh and Oil… go figure.

[QUOTE=mainecheng;136409]I think Al Gore Got it wrong. Global warming is an incorrect statement. Global Change is more accurate. Swings in Temps and climate shifts. There will be a correction i’m sure. Heat on the earth is directed more my solar output and atmosphere density. One good volcanic eruption and zap. You’ve got a “summer that never was” Or a Mini IceAge when NY Harbor freezes… Tell me what the solar output was back in the last ice age, Or better yet back when there was no arctic zones. Yes that’s correct. Once Antarctica was free of Ice and so was the North Slope. There is agricultural evidence of this. - Seeds and plants under the ice. Oh and Oil… go figure.[/QUOTE]

There is no doubt there has been climate shifts in the past but the current thing people are calling global warming which is alarming scientists and pretty much all folks not still debating whether the earth is flat or not is the RATE at which the earth is warming now. Heck, even Exxon now admits global warming is real and actions must be taken to reduce emissions. This rate of warming is unprecedented and will within 50-100 years cause serious disruptions in civilization. Civilizations in the past had 1000s of years to migrate and change agricultural locations but not now.

Even if it’s no global warming, don’t you think it’s a good idea to cut down on the waste full use of oil?
And USA has the biggest reason to fear change in global temperature, the Midwest and South is going to turn into a desert if thing don’t change.

It appears to be about 95 percent natural cycle and natural event, and perhaps 5 percent influenced by human activity.

Man cannot do a thing about ice ages that occur about every 25,000 years, followed by warming periods, or solar flares, meteor strikes, and volcanic activity.

[QUOTE=mainecheng;136409]I think Al Gore Got it wrong. Global warming is an incorrect statement. Global Change is more accurate. Swings in Temps and climate shifts. There will be a correction i’m sure. Heat on the earth is directed more my solar output and atmosphere density. One good volcanic eruption and zap. You’ve got a “summer that never was” Or a Mini IceAge when NY Harbor freezes… Tell me what the solar output was back in the last ice age, Or better yet back when there was no arctic zones. Yes that’s correct. Once Antarctica was free of Ice and so was the North Slope. There is agricultural evidence of this. - Seeds and plants under the ice. Oh and Oil… go figure.[/QUOTE]

Your first sentence; “I think Al Gore Got it wrong.” is an attempt to link an unpopular political figure with a controversial issue.There are thousands of politicians, scientists, and so forth involved in the climate change debate… Better propaganda please.

can someone answer for me how CO2 produced at the surface can rise to the upper atmosphere when it is heavier that air?

not saying that the planet isn’t getting warmer but just wondering is all…

[QUOTE=c.captain;136429]can someone answer for me how CO2 produced at the surface can rise to the upper atmosphere when it is heavier that air?

not saying that the planet isn’t getting warmer but just wondering is all…[/QUOTE]

CO2 doesn’t rise up but hangs around in excess quantities and acts as an insulator in the atmosphere around us causing temperatures to rise since the heat cannot escape. Increases in CO2 levels from natural sources caused the end of the last Ice Age. There weren’t a lot of cars, trucks and factories 10,000 years ago, which was a little before the birth of c.captain, so the end of the Ice Age took 10,000 years and life adapted because 10,000 years is a really long time. But now the CO2 supply is increasing at an unprecedented rate because human inventions are spewing the stuff out by the billions of tons and warming is exponentially accelerated. Humans don’t have 10,000 years to adapt so we need to lower the CO2 emissions to buy some time. Lowering CO2 emissions is not a bad idea anyway as there is not a lot of downside to having many sources of energy.

[QUOTE=c.captain;136429]can someone answer for me how CO2 produced at the surface can rise to the upper atmosphere when it is heavier that air?

not saying that the planet isn’t getting warmer but just wondering is all…[/QUOTE]

Come on C.Capt. You know this.

I’m sure you remember the 2nd law of Thermodynamics and the concept of Entropy from your days at KP.

Or were you skipping class so you could spend more time at marching band practice?

[QUOTE=Jetryder223;136460] Or were you skipping class so you could spend more time at marching band practice?[/QUOTE]

why do you think I revere Capt. Kenneth R. Force, USMS so? HE IS LIKE A GOD TO ME! I worship the very support hose he wears.

All Hail the Great Force…Half man, half Oompa Loompa…HUZZAH!

      • Updated - - -

[QUOTE=tengineer1;136459]CO2 doesn’t rise up but hangs around in excess quantities and acts as an insulator in the atmosphere around us causing temperatures to rise since the heat cannot escape. [/QUOTE]

So you’re saying all this excess CO2 is at the surface? How does that trap in heat then?

I was under the impression that the CO2 was high in the atmosphere and acting like the roof on a greenhouse hence the term…

[QUOTE=c.captain;136468]why do you think I revere Capt. Kenneth R. Force, USMS so? HE IS LIKE A GOD TO ME! I worship the very support hose he wears.

All Hail the Great Force…Half man, half Oompa Loompa…HUZZAH!

      • Updated - - -

So you’re saying all this excess CO2 is at the surface? How does that trap in heat then?

I was under the impression that the CO2 was high in the atmosphere and acting like the roof on a greenhouse hence the term…[/QUOTE]

A greenhouse gas does not have to be high up in the atmosphere to trap heat. CO2 does this by allowing solar energy in readily but trapping much of the resulting thermal energy given off by the earth. Instead of this energy returning to the atmosphere, some is released back into the earth.

[QUOTE=catherder;136475]A greenhouse gas does not have to be high up in the atmosphere to trap heat. CO2 does this by allowing solar energy in readily but trapping much of the resulting thermal energy given off by the earth. Instead of this energy returning to the atmosphere, some is released back into the earth.[/QUOTE]

You know I was just discovered the obvious connection between the longevity of KRF and Global Warming…must be all the greenhouse gasses he emits into the earth’s atmosphere on a daily basis!

This grandiose moment calls for many ruffles with flourishes! Strike up the Band…HUZZAH!

[QUOTE=c.captain;136468]why do you think I revere Capt. Kenneth R. Force, USMS so? HE IS LIKE A GOD TO ME! I worship the very support hose he wears.

All Hail the Great Force…Half man, half Oompa Loompa…HUZZAH!

      • Updated - - -

…[/QUOTE]

Then you will truly enjoy this…

//youtu.be/xH25Cm_0kX4

[QUOTE=Jetryder223;136487]Then you will truly enjoy this…[/QUOTE]

for the love of God!..will the blob never retire?

Oh well…all hail Jabba the Hutt!