[QUOTE=OSV-Florida;138757]I understand JDCavo’s input and it is appreciated. His contribution to this forum is invaluable. It’s also obvious that the poster was asking about the national license and the STCW endorsement, and the USCG was clearly answering that question. He even asked about “approval to test”, which is what you do for a national endorsement through the USCG! As far as wishing someone a denial, God help you man you are the devil incarnate! I have known plenty of guys who got their licenses by following different paths other than mine, saving them time, money, and effort, and I only wish them well. Of course I’m jealous, but they did nothing wrong!!! When you upgraded, I’m sure you took the fastest and easiest approach possible, as would any human being.[/QUOTE]
if these men followed a path that didn’t end around the established system then fine. All seatime is different and it was much easier in years past to use seatime from other types of vessels to upgrade a UL license. There was even a time that a local REC could make their own determinations and grant tonnage upgrades but those days are over now that there are the STCW '95 rules. Everything changes when they were implemented and those who came after had a harder road to hoe that those who started before. That is just the changing dynamics of obtaining and upgrading a license. nothing more and nothing less…
[QUOTE=OSV-Florida;138757]After being licensed, a sailor still needs to work his/her way up in each unique industry they choose to pursue, and any company worth their salt will not hire someone directly into a supervisory position aboard a vessel they are not familiar with. The same goes for sailors that take the jobs. If I got a masters UL through this path, I would be happy to take a job as third mate and junior DPO if I decided to give drilling a try, so I could take the time needed to learn the operations of a drill ship/rig, a little humble pie is good for everyone! But wishing people ill, hoping they have to sacrifice more money, effort, time away from family and lost years of potential higher income to provide for those families just because you had to work harder for something is just psychotic, you twisted f@@k, and I wish the same misfortune to you and your family too.[/QUOTE]
as I stated before there are two camps
you are in the red camp and I am in the blue…we each see this matter differently but I have my own vested interest that the path to UL master not become subverted to make yet more holders of that license chasing a finite number of positions which are already fewer that those which hold the UL master license out there (3000 total?) obtained though the mandated CFR path. Hell you make top $$$ with an OSV 6000gt which I am on record as saying if a farce requiring minimal effort to obtain…what is your great drive to become a UL master? Obviously it is drillships. That is the only place where you make more $$$ than a large OSV without spending years sucking a big union Johnson.
Sorry but I don’t want you there without having climbed the ladder to get there. My feelings towards drillship mates getting unrestricted UL ocean master without having been on anything other than a drillship is a whole other matter which has been discussed here and as far as I am concerned, they too are getting away with gaming the system to their benefit. How a mariner can be considered qualified to command ANY vessel on the earth without actually sailing over the earth is another travesty which I hope someday to be ended!
btw, it is twisted [B][I][U]FUCK[/U][/I][/B]. Can’t you even spell properly?
