I consider myself lucky to find this thread not closed yet by the Fellow wiith " quid est veritas" written in green on his Cheng’s hard hat.
My humble suggestion if I may of course, He changes that to " semper veritas " as cancelling/shutting down/muting those quoting dissenting opinions on the issue in question, suggests inclination to be in favour of " veritas mea melior est quam tua " . Which is very convenient for those who have the power to dismiss and/or cancel.
I am sure hard hat has enough space to accommodate it and red colour may turn out most appropriate.
Seeking the truth is a human thing and finding it may require hearing oppinions of those thinking differently.
Here is one which can be difficult to challenge but of course it can be muted or deleted or …flagged.
" Hot or Not: Steven Koonin Questions Conventional Climate Science and Methodology| Uncommon Knowledge " by Hoover Institution
It’s not about climate science but rather about how science works out cause and effect including climate change. I found it to be tough sledding in places, took a while but a very good book.
Not much point in discussing science topics without some understanding.
In case You did not know ,blinded by your stubborn insistence to post anything in this environment abt GW/CCH, Ukraine loosing and similar topics lert me ask you a question
