History lesson

Are you speaking of the US?

Tell your president to stay out of the ME. It would please the EU if the US had stayed out many years ago.The US seems to wash their hands of the refugees they create and leave it to their EU ‘allies’. I suppose it is because the US Is an island. The EU would not have had as many refugees entering and straining the system they set up to take care of their own citizens. Give credit to them for not locking them up in internment camps. The US is directly responsible for many problems plaguing the EU now due to their stirring up the ME hornets nest and then they walk off and leave the problems to the EU? No wonder the EU countries say no thank you to the latest insane war of choice of the US.

In reading over the entire thread I see that Poland, once again, gets left out. They were victims of a serious disinformation campaign by Stalin to denigrate their contribution to defeating Hitler. Stalin wanted badly to annex Poland after the war and took every opportunity to belittle them.

It’s true that the Germans overran Poland early but the Polish never surrendered (like France). Elements of their army fought on the Eastern front and a large contingent marched to the middle east and joined the Allies in North Africa, Sicily and Italy. A Polish unit captured Monte Cassino after fierce fighting had forced the other allies to withdraw.

Polish pilots made up 20% of the airmen in the Battle of Britain.

At Stalin’s insistence the Poles were excluded from the allied conference in Yalta and not allowed to march in the London victory parade.

They too deserve recognition for their heroism in the allied victory over the Nazis.

Tatarstan was AUTONOMOUS Soviet republic. Jewish Autonomous Oblast located in far east of russian Soviet socialist republic

Honestly, I couldn’t agree more. That is why I was vehemently opposed to our involvement in the Arab Spring, picking sides in the Syrian Civil War & the overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya. I’m a simple guy but I predicted Germanys +1 Million immigration year, a year in advance. But our WH, Senate & House were controlled by a different political party at that time so Europe, the US media & the sheepal were all in favor of those illegal actions while opposed to our current folly.

Speaking of follies. 14% of Europeans weren’t born there. Over 30% are 1st generation immigrants into their salad bowl (not melting pot) immigrant countries. 45% are over the age of 50. And their militaries are unproportionally filled with multi-generational natives compared to their new immigrants. The peasants of the Middle-East listened to Turkeys President Erdogan when he told them to conquer Europe with their wives & daughters bellies. It is idiotic for the US to continue to be in NATO to support those people. Let Europe try to defend Europe. The US in NATO is bad for both Europe & the US.

Maybe a bit of history in the making?
(“Remember the day when we sat on a golden toilet on the Mall”):slight_smile:

Golden toilet statue on Mall pays faux tribute to Trump renovations

It’s the latest work from Secret Handshake, a guerrilla art group that has installed several pieces of artwork on the Mall protesting the Trump administration.


A “throne” statue appeared Monday morning near the Lincoln Memorial in D.C. (Maxine Wallace/The Washington Post)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2026/03/30/trump-toilet-statue-golden-throne-national-mall/

Another history lesson, to be learned or not!

From today’s Wikipedia lead article - “The 1937 tour of Germany by the Duke and Duchess of Windsor was opposed by the British government, which feared that Nazi Germany would use the visit for propaganda.”

From today’s news - King Charles and Camilla to meet President Trump on US state visit in April - BBC News

I thought you guys had your own USA king!

Just FYI , most of lend lease stuff came through Iran

It diminishes role played by other people . My father, his four brothers, mom’s dad and his brother, my grandma’s two brothers - we’re all Red army soldiers. NONE of them considered himself “ russian”.

It was borrowed from little green goblin and most famous penis piano player called “..Elenski” . He and his most immediate entourage have made quite a good use of the ca 350 bn usd received from USA. U surely like the fellow very much .

They built concentration camps and were resposible for holocaust . They drunk hatred towards Jews with their mothers milk ( jewish ambasador words) . Hence because Jews run/control the media and academy it is part of the payback(silence).

Every Pole grandpa or child will have to pay ca 200 000 usd to jewish organisations making money in so called Holocaust industry ( see prof Noraman Filkenstein) and the US governement will apply pressure on PL government that all what is due is paid (statue 447 (Justice for Uncompensated Survivors Today – JUST Act of 2017

In other words instead of chasing indyviduals who commited crimes and enriched themselves due to Jewish plight they wisely figured to make the whole country and population liable and milk them dry .

Britain’s royal family had blood connections to all the monarchies of Europe and royal families tended to marry widely, not necessarily from their own nations. Hence Prince Phillip’s sister had married a German who became a Nazi. Phillip was not a member of the British royal family at that time (he was in the Greek royal family) but was a junior officer in the Royal Navy and served at sea in action. He and Princess Elizabeth had met and later courted.

Any suggestion that Hitler was reluctant to fight Britain is simply wrong. He wanted to take Britain (Operation Sea Lion) but couldn’t with the power of the RN undiminished and air superiority unable to be won after defeat at the Battle of Britain in 1940 (another example of Hitler being turned back without US forces for @Hawsepiper). Hitler changed his mind and gave up.

German and British royal families were at war with each other in WWI, remember. The Kaiser, Tsar and King George V were cousins.

Yes I mentioned the battle of Britain in my originally posed question as an example of a defensive stand. Defensive stands are admirable and not insignificant but would not serve to defeat the third Reich. That would require offensive power to strike at the heart of the Nazi industrial machine which was non existent prior to the US entry. Hence, no path for Nazi defeat without US entry.

Just look at how NATO and the EU are failing to support Ukraine.

Without the US, within a few more years the Russians will start carving off pieces of Europe however they please.

Fine. That doesn’t give you trolling rights in this forum to label other people as so ignorant they make you sick. There are more gracious ways to make that point.

I am not a huge fan of history and rather ignorant but for guys like me AI sollutions are an excellent way of quick learning about sth I did not know or was not sure.

AI result is here: Was hitler reluctant ………………..?

Yes, Adolf Hitler was generally reluctant to launch a full-scale invasion of Great Britain, preferring instead to reach a negotiated peace that would allow him to focus on his primary objective: the invasion of the Soviet Union. He regarded Britain as a “natural ally” and a “fellow Aryan power” and initially viewed the conflict with the British as an unnecessary distraction from his eastern expansion goals.

Reasons for Reluctance and Inaction:

  • Political Hopes for Peace: After the fall of France in June 1940, Hitler believed Britain was effectively defeated and would accept an “honourable” negotiated settlement, wherein Germany dominated continental Europe while Britain retained its empire.

  • Strategic Priorities (The East): Hitler’s ultimate goal was always to conquer Lebensraum (living space) in the Soviet Union. A long, taxing, two-front war was something he initially wanted to avoid.

  • Admiration for the British Empire: Hitler possessed a strange “love-hatred” for Britain, admiring its empire and viewing it as a protector of white racial supremacy, which he did not want to destroy.

  • Military Feasibility (Operation Sea Lion): Both Hitler and his military commanders (specifically the Navy) held serious doubts about the success of an amphibious assault due to the superiority of the Royal Navy and lack of sufficient German landing craft.

    The Shift to Attempted Invasion (Operation Sea Lion):
    Despite his reluctance, Hitler authorized plans for an invasion, known as Operation Sea Lion, as a last resort when Britain refused to surrender, largely thanks to the leadership of Winston Churchill. However, his commitment to the invasion was inconsistent, treating it more as a pressure tactic or “bluff” than an inevitable military action.

Why the Invasion Did Not Happen:

  1. Failure of the Luftwaffe: Hitler demanded air superiority before invading. The Luftwaffe failed to destroy the Royal Air Force (RAF) during the Battle of Britain.

  2. Postponement: When it became clear that the RAF was not defeated and weather conditions in the English Channel were turning, Hitler postponed Sea Lion indefinitely on September 17, 1940.

  3. Turn to Russia: Hitler ultimately pivoted to his real objective, Operation Barbarossa (the invasion of the USSR). ============================= ===================== Hence can you provide a link or source to validate you contrary opinion pls ???

I don’t have any violently opposite opinions. Your original suggestion was that Hitler was reluctant to fight Britain with a reason being some Nazi/royal family connections.

In the end Hitler fought Britain throughout the war with Britain the only nation there at the start and staying until the final surrender. So whatever he thought about invasion, he created a determined, forever enemy which he had to fight regardless. He wanted Britain one way or the other but couldn’t have it.

Your suggestion of the Nazi/royal thing as a reason for not invading doesn’t stand up to scrutiny and I attempted to answer that aspect of your question.

I will be damned .No kidding?? I checked and indeed there was a thing like that.

Now i understand how the Brits have copied the idea from Soviets by puting after world war II all surviving Jews first in Cyprus and then just dropped them on the desert in a very inconvenient neighbourhood hoping they would all be killed by Arabs. How very convenient.

But now I have an idea for Americans dwelling here.

You have absorbed recently according to various sources between 15-25 mln immigrants most of them illegal : uneducated , unskilled , unvaccinated & and UNeffingEVERYTHING else and you had to switch into GIVING /PAYING mode before they accommodated and became succesfull “scar faces “ pedling drugs and figuring how to make makishift bombs in order to scare the shit out of decent US citizens , how to vote for dems or may be some are thinking now how to make another 911 using drones produced in Ukraine - your friendly and expensive ally .

Who knows??

You have a huge chance to bring peace to Middle East by collecting all ca 8 -9 mln Israelis who are :

highly educated , extremely well skilled in espionage and high end electronics and hi tech gadgets like telephone bombs ,eavesdropping gadgets and IT items, all knowing perfectly american english , highly cultured and religious , highly skilled in cleaning jobs and demolition jobs ( look how well Gaza was cleaned ) , skilled in money and fortune making and in controlling media, academy , movies , diamond /gold markets and most of all controlling other governments congresses and senates or similar governing bodies, the smartest folk on earth, who will bring you even their own nukes so you will not have to give them. !!!

All these 15+ bln usd a year pumped there will stay in your country and there will be no need to spend other billions to bribe the neighbouring Aranb countries not to attack them . It is a good DEAL .

You have some deserts ??? Don’t You ???
Drop them there and they will convert the land into gardens of Eden and futuristic cities seen in SI-FI movies.

The collateral from above would be peace on earth and in a year max two, your dollar will be gold based and Nobel Peace Prize is a sure thing in the next voting.

Just implement the Soviet and Brits idea w/o inventing the wheel again and the whole world will give a sigh of relief.

I stand corrected. The “Persian Corridor” did supply more Lend-Lease material to USSR than the Murmansk Convoys alone:
While the Persian Corridor through Iran was a crucial, massive supply route during World War II, it was not the single largest route for all Lend-Lease materials, though it was vital for trucks and aircraft. Approximately 7.9 million long tons (nearly 45%) of US aid went through Iran, but other routes like the Arctic Convoys and Pacific route were equally critical depending on the timeframe.
Source: AI Overview
But the question of how large % of the total requirement for the USSR’s war effort did this represent stand unanswered.

“Now they say that the allies never helped us, but it can’t be denied that the Americans gave us so many goods without which we wouldn’t have been able to form our reserves and continue the war. We didn’t have explosives, gunpowder. We didn’t have anything to charge our rifle cartridges with. The Americans really saved us with their gunpowder and explosives. And how much sheet steel they gave us! How could we have produced our tanks without American steel? But now they make it seem as if we had an abundance of all that. Without American trucks we wouldn’t have had anything to pull our artillery with.”

  • Soviet General Georgy Zhukov

In particular it was logistics trucks and food that made the biggest difference from what I’ve studied. Imported trucks outnumbered domestically built ones by two or three to one. Without them, the Soviet Union was able to stop the Germans, but it’s only with them they were able to drive the Germans back. They didn’t need us to avoid losing, but they did need us to win.

Churchill knew he needed the US to finish the war. In return Britain gave the US the magnetron, the research of Allied Tubes for the Manhattan Project and an unsinkable aircraft carrier and marshaling point of the coast of Europe.

The convoys to Murmansk was something my father, a New Zealander, serving on a corvette could have done without. Yes it was a political move that had a minor effect on the war. He also served in HMS Achilles during the Battle of the River Plate.

The D day invasion fleet was commanded by Admiral Gordon Ramsay RN who was an outstanding officer who had the full confidence of the American Command. He was unfortunately was killed in an air accident 3 weeks after D day. Alive the allies would have taken Antwerp and shortened the war in Europe.

In my own neck of the woods it was the US that saved the day with Guadalcanal and the battle of the Coral Sea. Of a population of 1.6 million 200,000 New Zealanders were serving in the Military and they were all somewhere else.

The Brits defeated the Japanese in Burma but the main burden of defeating the Japanese lay with the Americans.

Truman was faced with an invasion of Japan with casualties of up to 500,000 or using the bomb. He dropped two because they knew that Japan didn’t believe they had another one. Secret communications between the Japanese Embassy in Portugal were intercepted revealed the thinking in the Japanese High Command.

Truman was faced with what would he tell the relatives if he went ahead with an invasion and it came to light that he had the bomb and could have saved thousands of lives. My father was in HMNZS Gambia, a cruiser who in company with an American cruiser fired the last shots of the war at the Japanese mainland at a Yamaha factory, now better known as a producer of musical instruments.

My mother was very pleased.

.