Future marine fuels

Engineering Marine Engineering
221
222

Singapore sees possibilities in onboard carbon capture and storage:

Maybe because that MAY lengthen the time existing bunkering business will be viable?

The “Sugar King” Robert Kuok wants in, so it has to be good business:

PS> He is also interested because he own several shipping companies that need to be prepared for the future marine fuel.

223

Others are also looking at Carbon Capture as a way forward:

224
225

Popular comparison in another context here, but first time I’ve seen it used in respect of conversion to "green shipping and future fuels:

226

Vale is going for multi-fuel capabilities for the ULOC on their charter:

227

Maersk don’t think ICS is ambitious enough when it comes to “green changes” in shipping:

228
229

Before ships can sail emission free there have to be bunkering possibilities:

230
231

Detailed study of the pros and cons for various contenders for future marine fuel:

1 Like
232
233

The question of which will be the future marine fuel dominates the shipping media these days:

Although emissions discussions focus on future fuels that will power shipping cleanly, energy efficiency remains the true and immediate enabler of decarbonisation, writes Aleksander Askeland of Yara Marine Technologies.

234
235

New ships ordered with alternative fuel capabilities is increasing:

236
237

Quick study on alternative energy sources (ammonia, methanol, hydrogen and batteries) on icebreakers:

238

Ammonia predicted to be the winner to become the leading marine fuel by 2050:

239

How about propane it burns clean in my truck

240

Massive release of Co2 when its produced