Another tanker collision in South China Sea

https://splash247.com/two-tankers-on-fire-off-singapore/?unapproved=46185&moderation-hash=0c63b3309ea3246eb4c4653008b131db#comment-46185

Hitting what appears a stationary object seems easy. But why?
Looks like “detect ” and “intercept ” mission.
Weird.

A famous T’bone collision comes into my mind in the Med. sea when Tunesian Ferry Ulysse hit right smack in the middle CLS Virginia anchored container vesssel in 2018. Brief description of this famous piece of nautical action in gCaptain link below :
Photos: Oil Spills After Tunisian Ferry T-Bones Anchored Containership in Mediterranean

But I am not suggesting any similarities regarding the causes.

Dark fleet again…
Then did a runner being towed by 2 tug boats ( where did they come from?)
Malaysia gov have arrested the ship
All just north of Pedra Branca where they do the ship to ship transfers
Was accident cover for a different issue?

1 Like

Latest known “facts” on this incident:

1 Like

IMHO blaming AIS spoofing for the collision is a nonsense. Hafnia had at least two radars which were ARPA fitted and their officers had all STCW required ARPA traning certificates. One does not need AIS data from 300+ loa tanker to avoid collision in the existing traffic environment and conditions. There must be other reason for this collision.

middle of the day in good weather too

1 Like

Reports say it happened before 6am. Alarm was raised with authorities at 0615 local.
When I looked at Marinetraffic that day, the only Ceres 1 showing was anchored - in Lanshan 2500nm away.
I agreee with radar comments above.
Love to know what playback on Hafnia Nile’s ECDIS & VDR shows…

1 Like

For the official view so far, I just had a wee look at MPA site…
Rescue of Crew in Distress in Progress | Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (mpa.gov.sg)
In Response to Media Queries on Hafnia Nile | Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (mpa.gov.sg)

1 Like

More twist and turn to the story:

1 Like

Not just “dark”.
Completely off the records (IMO 9229439) of IACS, Equasis.org and Tokyo MoU since 2019 (preceded by a lot of deficient inspections).

1 Like

6:00am is still pretty dark here

1 Like

Where did the tugs come from?

1 Like

Maybe this explains it:

“Believed” but not confirmed, though.

PS> My guess would have been tugs from Batam, or the anchorage off South Johor coast,
Unless the tug just happened to be around and spotted a salvage opportunity (LOF).

1 Like

Who claimed the spoofing was to blame?

The profesor
The National University of Singapore (NUS) law faculty’s Emeritus Professor Robert Beckman said AIS spoofing may have contributed to Ceres I colliding with the Hafnia Nile.

Had the professor instead said something like “The spoofing is likely to have been been a significant factor in the collision” than perhaps one might reasonably infer blame.

The statement the professor actually made leaves open the possibility of other contributing factors and that the spoofing may not have contributed at all.

Prof could also have mentioned that an attempted hijacking could have equally contributed. I wonder why that wasn’t mentioned?

This is what Professor said:

The Professor of law is entitled to have an opinion , so are master mariners with decades of experience navigating ships and utilising effective anticollision measures before ARPA and long before AIS have become available and compulsory tools on navigation bridges.

I am 100% sure You Sir are one of them and given the con of Hafnia under described circumstances, You would have avoided collision with Ceres I using as your tool…(You know what) and with your eyes closed. I can bet on it.

A post was merged into an existing topic: Collision in Australia!

Lots of ships (mostly "dark fleet tankers?) anchored in the area of this collision:
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:104.9/centery:1.6/zoom:10

1 Like

Was wondering :wink: which of them on the presented pic/ling are " DARK "

1 Like