From ychangenow.com
November 2, 2010 Print Copy
The ‘AMC solution?’ Where?
In a Nov. 2 post on their campaign Web site, Jack Hearn and his AMO Membership Committee listed what they called “real issues” in this AMO election, and they called upon seagoing AMO members everywhere to “vote the AMC solution.”
The Hearn-AMC “issues” were five points recycled from previous posts, and the "AMC solution " was nowhere to be found in these latest versions. Jack and the AMC were no more specific in this new post about what they would do as AMO officials or how they would do it than they had been since they began their campaign last April.
The pension issue led the list this time. Jack and the AMC said nothing more about their proposed strategy, but we already know that the Hearn-AMC plan outlined earlier would bring the AMO Pension Plan from deficient to bankrupt in three years or less – making matters even worse for active AMO members and ending monthly benefit payouts to AMO members and survivors already on the retirement rolls.
The second point was a pledge to “improve financial management” by “cutting executive pay and privilege.” Again, no details here – but we already know that any anticipated savings from payroll reductions under a Hearn-AMC administration would be canceled out by retainer fees, monthly expense assessments and “billable hours” paid to the unidentified consulting firms Jack and the AMC have said they would hire for job development, contract negotiations and lobbying.
In their third point, Jack and the AMC said they would promote “true transparency,” but we already know that Jack and the AMC prefer to keep seagoing AMO members in the dark about such important matters as Jack’s campaign collaborations with convicted felons and their debt to the Washington-based law firm that has advised Jack and the AMC since 2005. If Jack and the AMC are in fact committed to “true transparency,” they can demonstrate that now – as candidates – by identifying the consulting firms they would retain, specifying what each firm would cost and setting a time frame for their services.
Fourth, Jack and the AMC would “crew-up” membership committees to “review contracts, fair shipping rules, and Constitutional protections and independence.” Of course, Jack and the AMC did not acknowledge that AMO membership committees now actually negotiate contracts as well as review them. Nor did Jack and the AMC explain specifically how they would “crew” these committees or where they find fault in the AMO National Constitution or in the deep-sea or Great Lakes shipping rules (Do Jack and the AMC even know that there are separate shipping rules?).
Finally, Jack and the AMC would “protect jobs and growth” by hiring “real expertise to build a business plan by keeping the AMO competitive.” This means “marketing,” and that starts with “M” and that stands for “Money” for high-priced businesses more accustomed to selling cereal than finding jobs for U.S. merchant marine officers – again, so much for operating cost savings under a Hearn-AMC administration.
The number of jobs brought into AMO under our administration since January 2007 recently surpassed 500, the number we had counted through September 2010 – and we secured this new deep-sea, Great Lakes and inland waters employment without marketing consultants.
As for “keeping the AMO competitive,” Jack and the AMC apparently remain unaware that AMO already stands as the largest and strongest union of U.S. merchant marine officers. And Jack and the AMC have charged that AMO contracts are in fact too competitive – a contradiction that defies the new warning by Jack and the AMC that “this is not the time to be indecisive.”
Tom Bethel, National President
José Leonard, National Secretary-Treasurer
Bob Kiefer, National Executive Vice President
Joe Gremelsbacker, National Vice President (Deep Sea)
Don Cree, National Vice President (Great Lakes)
Charles Murdock, National Vice President (Inland Waters)
Mike Murphy, National Vice President (Government Relations)