There have already been a few threads expressing outrage at
the lopsided rehabilitation plan. There has been talk of voting out
the union leadership, i.e closing the barn door. Now instead,
can we actually do something effective?
There is a perception that because the officer/trustees are among
the membership who have already received the buyout, the rehab plan
was skewed to favor those members who (like them) have received
the buyout. Can we confirm this somehow? Would this not
comprise a definite conflict of interest?
Can the trustees be persuaded to rewrite the rehabilitation plan
to be more equitable for all members? Who would have the means
of persuasion? Some government watchdog that can penalize
trustees who betray trust? Or perhaps a lawsuit?