AMO Pension

I have a couple theories why McKay won in 06 and then Bethel in 08: voter apathy and fear. We’re still overcoming the idea that our vote really never mattered because the results would be “massaged” to the administration’s desired outcome. Plus, I’ve never believed the ballots were secret anyway. Look at the new HQ vote–we “passed” that one but I know nobody who voted for it. Again turnout was dismally low.

Let’s not forget that, for the most part, until recently, nobody actually F’ed up anybody’s money personally. Sure, there have been instances where “donations” were required to work, and if they didn’t like you you just didn’t work, or worked horrible contracts. But we always had “reasonable” job security and the 20-and-out pension, and as long as you kept your nose clean you could make it–or work a couple more years and get the BUYOUT! So many members didn’t want to kill the goose, so to speak.

Well, now they messed with our money directly, and most of us are pissed. Shame this had to be the tipping point, though. Even worse than that, the administration keeps getting better and better pay and benefits the whole while. Now I see Tommy justifying his inflated pay and I’m even MORE pissed. I thought he should have cut his own pay as soon as this pension crisis hit. Sure, it wouldn’t have made a difference financially to the rest of us, but it sends the message: “Hey, I’m with you.” Instead the message we’re getting is “I’m better than you and you need to be glad for these little scraps I’m generously giving you.” We’re pretty loyal dogs in this union, but you keep torturing us and we’ll bite your ass.

I would have liked to seen Jack debate Tommy, but that’s a moot point now–Jack couldn’t do it now if he wanted. Though Jack was probably smart not to–I remember attending a union meeting during the lawsuits and Jack was promised time to speak…then when it came time for him to speak Dan the Douche Smith kept talking over him and interrupting, claiming procedural violations. So jack never got to say his piece, and their handpicked stooges moved to reject Jack’s election appeal.

And Tommy: your administration was in power when the fund “crashed”. You fell asleep at the wheel and we all paid (or didn’t get paid). Maybe if you wrote fewer articles explaining what the Jones Act is and spent less time kissing company ass you may have caught this in time. You failed. And I don’t agree with your claim that Jack has no union administration experience–it’s a fallacious argument. Don’t you have a month of turnover time? Don’t we get on new, unfamiliar ships all the time? There may be bumps along the way as Jack learns, but I think it insults his intelligence to suggest he can’t learn or get the job done.

There was a post on here a couple days ago (from “Jaxsailor”?) detailing questions he had for Tommy and Tommy’s typically convoluted and self-serving response that actually answered nothing–but the post was pretty quickly pulled. Anyone know what happened there?

Can’t wait to see my “buyout” amount. Get the stroke ward ready. Definitely change now and vote AMC!

From ychangenow

October 1, 2010 Print Copy
Why change now?

There was one very important element missing from Jack Hearn’s “Top Ten reasons” to vote for change in this year’s AMO election – reason itself, as in clear, honest thinking. The list posted recently by Jack and his AMO Membership Committee included plenty of the misstatements, misrepresentations, unfounded allegations and blatant falsehoods we are accustomed to from Jack and the AMC, but no logic and no sense.

By contrast, there are many reasons for AMO members to hold fast to this administration with their ballots – all of them addressed here in complete detail in other posts. These reasons include:
Full employment – AMO is the only U.S. merchant marine officers’ union that can claim full employment and the only officers’ union with the real prospect of full employment over the next four years.

Why change now?

The largest officers’ union – AMO represents approximately 4,000 seagoing members and applicants (engineers, deck officers, radio/electronics officers and stewards). Under this administration, the AMO employment base has grown by 500 billets, while the other officers’ unions have lost jobs in record numbers.

Why change now?

The lowest membership dues – AMO members enjoy the lowest membership dues rate among the three officers’ unions by thousands of dollars a year, and this administration is determined to maintain this important distinction.

Why change now?

Financial assets – AMO’s net worth today is higher than it has ever been since AMO was chartered in 1949. In fiscal 2010, net worth in AMO rose by more than 8 million to $21,430,311.00. These figures can be verified in the AMO Statements of Financial Position, March 31, 2010 and 2009. These documents are available for membership review on the official AMO Web site (amo-union.org).

Why change now?

Government contracts – AMO members are working under 52 of 56 charters awarded by Military Sealift Command and the Maritime Administration through difficult competitive bidding by U.S. merchant vessel operators – charters that represent the single largest source of seagoing employment. This administration has the experience, the instinct and the know-how to keep sustain AMO’s superior standing in this increasingly important sector.

Why change now?

Unique employment options – AMO is alone among U.S. merchant marine officers’ unions in providing unprecedented opportunities for professional advancement in emerging maritime markets worldwide, in senior management positions in the maritime industries in the United States and overseas and in combined seagoing/shoreside career development.

Why change now?

Union properties – AMO has sold, purchased and renovated several properties since January 2007, and construction of AMO’s first-ever authentic headquarters building in Dania Beach continues on budget and on schedule, all without mortgages or other debt.

Why change now?

Legal matters – AMO has won every lawsuit brought against it by AMO members defeated in AMO elections and by a former executive director of AMO Plans (the only individual granted immunity from prosecution in USA v. McKay). AMO today is free of litigation and its expenses.

Why change now?

Administrative experience – This administration’s experienced team has a solid record of achievement on behalf of the AMO membership, and we have transformed the way AMO operates – including bringing the seagoing membership into the policy process through referendums and consultations aboard vessels and in membership meetings. This administration also relies on rank and file committees during contract negotiations and continues to poll the affected seagoing AMO members on how to apportion total labor cost increases and economic price adjustments under existing collective bargaining agreements.

Why change now?

Transparency – This administration has opened AMO up in unprecedented ways, including encouraged participation by seagoing AMO members as observers in union executive board and AMO Plans trustee meetings, increased vessel visits, informational membership meetings in East, West and Gulf Coast ports, greater accessibility to AMO officials through cell phones and email, and greater communication and direct dialogue between the administration and the seagoing AMO membership, election reform, and first-ever access to critically important documents and other information through the official AMO Web site, the AMO newspaper and the online periodical Currents – all in the interest of helping the AMO membership understand how AMO operates. We will continue and enhance these strides toward greater transparency in the next four years.

Why change now?

Legislation and regulation – AMO is without question the most respected, most recognized and most trusted U.S. maritime policy interest in Washington DC. The AMO legislative staff has command of the issues and extensive contacts in both parties in both Congressional chambers and in the Executive Branch. In addition, Tom Bethel and Mike Murphy are known personally by the top officials and officers of the Maritime Administration, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation, U.S. Transportation Command and Military Sealift Command as men of their word and credible, effective advocates of the professional interests of the AMO membership.

Why change now?

Tom Bethel, National President
José Leonard, National Secretary-Treasurer
Bob Kiefer, National Executive Vice President
Joe Gremelsbacker, National Vice President (Deep Sea)
Don Cree, National Vice President (Great Lakes)
Charles Murdock, National Vice President (Inland Waters)
Mike Murphy, National Vice President (Government Relations)

This one is really interesting from ychangenow

October 1, 2010 Print Copy
Don’t take our word for it

The following is from the campaign Web site of Mike Jewell, candidate for president of the Marine Engineers’ Beneficial Association (mebaunited.com). It seems Mike knows more about AMO than Jack Hearn and his AMO Membership Committee do. The following text is as it appears on the MEBA United Web site.

Below is a list of contracts AMO has achieved (Jobs) so far in 2010

January 2010
AMO expands its presence in the Maritime Security Program (MSP) when Mares gives Argent Marine Operations a charter to operate the MT Michigan. AMO secures its first contract with Argent and picks up all of the officer billets on this open MSP tanker slot.

February 2010
MSC awards Sealift Inc., a contract to flag into the United States a resupply vessel in Diego Garcia—the M/V Mohegan. AMO gets all the officer billets.

AMO nearly completes its capturing of the U.S. car carrier fleet when ARC announces it will flag into the United States its 9th car carrier. AMO occupies all officer billets on the 9 car carriers.

AMO wins MSC RFP to man all deck and engine officer billets on 9 Bob Hope Class vessels.

March 2010
Maersk withdraws from the MEBA contracted vessel Maersk Arkansas from the MSP fleet and places the vessel into commercial operation still under the U.S.-Flag. Maersk signs a contract with AMO to man the vessel with all AMO officers. Ed Hanley, Maersk VP of Labor states: “This is another indication of the trusted partnership between Maersk and AMO.”

April 2010
Maersk flags into the United States the tanker vessel Bro Hawaii to operate in the Asia spot market. AMO gets all the officer billets onboard the vessel.

OSG (the same OSG MEBA has contracts with) takes delivery of a massive state of the art newbuild ATB named the OSG Vision. OSG signs a contract with AMO for all officer billets.

May 2010
AMO wins all officer jobs on 2 MSC chartered vessels and secures all engine officer billets on the newbuild ATB Freedom.

June 2010
MSC awards Maersk 10 vessels. 5 of the 10 vessels are MEBA (Kocak, Obregon, Pless, Stockham and Wheat). AMO will occupy all deck and engine officer positions on the 10 vessels.

MSC awards Maersk a contract on the MV Edward Carter to serve the U.S. Army. AMO occupies all officer billets.

July 2010
AMO expands its presence in the international flag fleet when Tyco decides to man the Vessel Resolute with AMO officers. Tyco could have gone elsewhere but did not. It is the 7th modern day vessel that Tyco has put U.S. officers aboard—and all AMO officers

Intermarine reflags to U.S. registry the M/V Ocean Crescent and AMO secures all officer billets.

August 2010
American Petroleum Tanker Company (APT) takes delivery of the new build M/T Empire State. It is the 4th of 5 newbuild product tankers know as the State Class. AMO mans all officer billets. APT is a company that was formed in mid-2009 by a group of investors. Rob Kurz is the President of the APT. AMO mans 2 ATB’s for Interocean American Shipping.

September 2010
MARAD extends the contract covering eight Fast Sealift Ships operated by Maersk Line Limited and manned in all licensed positions by AMO for six months commencing October 1, 2010.

AMO gets new work aboard 2 reflagged heavy lift ships (the BBC Australia and the BBC Houston)

Maersk Line shipping wins the Alaska Ocean Rangers Contract using all AMO Labor – 30 plus JOBS!

Hey Paul, how many of those jobs are “new”? How many ships did AMO lose - were these replacements for ships sent for scrap or sold foreign? Didn’t one go on the beach in India in August? Didn’t US Shipping get rid of six ships over the last two years, with some more ready to go anytime? Didn’t Maersk flag out a few ships foreign? Good thing all these “new” jobs are available, because there are still quite a few ships laid-up on the lakes.

If you want to compare MEBA to AMO, then let’s compare wages. They seem to have a mentality of quality, not quantity.

The MEBA also has a pension that’s solvent.

Spin, spin, spin, and I’m tired of it. Don’t bask in your glory if you’re not going to tell the whole story.

Awful Clark:
Remember Jack Hearn took a “buyout.” Where does he stand in this debate? He hasn’t said anything one way or another, just generalities about “equity.” Speaking of Hearn, the membership meeting you referred to was in February or March of 2007. Jack was supposed to defend his appeal to overturn the 2006 election. Smith was reading the appeal and he asked Jack to hold his questions or comments until the appeal was read. When Smith was done, the floor was offered to Jack, who sat there and said nothing. Jack’s friend and campaign adviser Tom Kelly chewed Jack out in an email, calling Jack a “bump on a log.” kelly was on probation at the time after admitting he stole $35,000 from the AMO. Later the Labor Department turned down 18 of the 19 complaints in Jack’s appeal, finding only that some Hearn-AMC mail did not get delivered.
New Engr:
I like the name Paul, but it isn’t mine. Yes, ships come and go over time. The point here is that the AMO stayed on the upside of the equation while the MEBA and the Mates ran aground. Look into what happened to the Interlake guys with the MEBA pension.

If ships (jobs) come and go over time (first time an AMO rep acknowledged this) why isn’t the membership kept up to date? What’s the big secret? It’s one thing in a long list of the secrecy agenda.

The Interlake incident was truly unfortunate for their employees and AMO. However, AMO did not have a leg to stand on because they were not part of the AFL-CIO. That’s why we had to buy into the SIU and, more recent, structure the new pension plan to reward their members. $10 says Sacco, Augie and the rest of the mafia are collecting on the new DC Plan. It still boggles my mind that a labor union, albeit a smaller one, was not part of the AFL-CIO.

The MEBA’s job base has been shrinking, definitely, but AMO has the jobs that pay a junior officer $40k a year. That’s something to be proud of! How many cadets at the maritime academies signed up with AMO this past spring? It was likely a small percentage of the total as the drilling companies offer a great salary and benefit package. Plus career stability and advancement.

I’m just disgruntled that AMO is a half-ass union that will only become worse under the Bethel family.

I’m not “an AMO rep.” Yes ships come and go (sale, scrap, OPA 90 deadlines, charters changing hands). It happens all the time, the nature of the business and everyone knows it. The AMO has had a net gain through it all which is good for everyone except Jack Hearn and the AMC. Your conspiracy theories about the SIU make Hearn look almost rational.

[QUOTE=NewEngr;42543]If ships (jobs) come and go over time (first time an AMO rep acknowledged this) why isn’t the membership kept up to date? What’s the big secret? It’s one thing in a long list of the secrecy agenda.

The Interlake incident was truly unfortunate for their employees and AMO. However, AMO did not have a leg to stand on because they were not part of the AFL-CIO. That’s why we had to buy into the SIU and, more recent, structure the new pension plan to reward their members. $10 says Sacco, Augie and the rest of the mafia are collecting on the new DC Plan. It still boggles my mind that a labor union, albeit a smaller one, was not part of the AFL-CIO.

The MEBA’s job base has been shrinking, definitely, but AMO has the jobs that pay a junior officer $40k a year. That’s something to be proud of! How many cadets at the maritime academies signed up with AMO this past spring? It was likely a small percentage of the total as the drilling companies offer a great salary and benefit package. Plus career stability and advancement.

I’m just disgruntled that AMO is a half-ass union that will only become worse under the Bethel family.[/QUOTE]

You got that right about half ass union, look what we do, underbid everyone for jobs. We underbid them so much that no other union in their right state of mind can or world take these jobs. That is nothing to be proud of. We are merely scabs, nothing even close about being a union, more or less we are a job manning agency under Sacco’s control and thumb.

Do you think Sacco gives a damn about us, no he doesn’t. We are just another tool to rake in the big bucks and mount over his fireplace as another trophy.

I’m tired of this crap. if I didn’t have all these years in service with AMO I would be at MEBA’s doorstep looking for a job. So the only answer for me is embrace Jack Hearns and the team. Why would I want any more of what we have? Don’t get me going about our pension either.

[B]YES to CHANGE NOW[/B]

[B]National President: Jack Hearn [/B]
[B]National Secretary Treasurer: Jim Schwartz[/B]
[B]National Executive Vice President: Matt Hight[/B]
[B]National Vice President, DeepSea: Mike Wachter[/B]
[B]National Vice President, Inland: Tim Reid[/B]
[B]NationalVicePresident,Government: Rich Horne[/B]
[B]National Vice President,Great Lakes: John Clemons[/B]

Spin
Which MEBA doorstep? They have halls all over the country and pay plenty to keep them going. Not to late to give it a shot. Settle on a MEBA hall and bring snacks and water, reading material and some clean clothes for a long wait. By the way, when did the SIU become an issue?

The SIU became an issue when AMO had to resort to buying in to them, as AMO was not an affiliate to the AFL-CIO. Without being a party to the AFL-CIO, it put the union in a bad position as the union could not pursue the Interlake-MEBA affair, not to mention the negative image it cast on AMO as a whole. So, the easy fix is to collude with Sacco and Co to make AMO an affiliate of the SIU. But why did AMO lose it’s AFL-CIO affiliation? Was it raiding MM&P and MEBA contracts? I think it was. How did this happen? From ignorant leadership.

At a recent commencement address to graduates of the apprenticeship program in Piney Point, an SIU official was proudly stating they will soon be the ONLY maritime union in the USA. When several AMO members questioned this, the SIU official disappeared, never to be seen again. This is not hearsay, this was with my own eyes and ears.

The SIU has always been an issue, just not on this topic of this forum. To their credit, SIU guys receive decent pay for their work - in fact, many are paid more than officers. I don’t harbor aggression or bad feelings towards these QMEDs and ABs as it’s not their doing, but I DO harbor aggravation at the ineptitude of AMO for allowing my oiler to be paid more than me as an engineer, for them to have standardized working conditions, and to have a defined-to-the-letter contract. SIU guys are not afraid to call their patrolman when a work issue arises, but when an AMO member calls the union about shipboard conduct, we are consistently told to keep our mouths shut and be happy we have a job.

Regarding the MEBA and their issues, I do not support certain aspects of how they conduct business (hiring halls vs using the internet), but given their perceived faults, their members have a pension and medical we wished we had, and pay scales we could only dream of.

The sweetheart deals AMO has, and continues, to make with various companies has to stop. It will only continue under the Bethel family. Do members get to individually vote (or even see) on a contract? Do the OSG ATB guys even have vacation pay? Did AMO ever sign a contract with APT and USS? Or did AMO get them to sign off on the new DC Plan and drop the negotiations? How many companies are working under an expired contract (or an extension of the existing MOA)?

The time to change is now. I am tired of paying $1500+ a year to a union that laughs at me, treats me like a retard, and could care less about the membership as a whole. Don’t forget the Political Action Fund money too. Lord knows if you forget to pay that you will get zero help from the dispatching office if you need it and will likely get a call “reminding” you why the PAF is so great.

[QUOTE=Hearnia;42554]Spin
Which MEBA doorstep? They have halls all over the country and pay plenty to keep them going. Not to late to give it a shot. Settle on a MEBA hall and bring snacks and water, reading material and some clean clothes for a long wait. By the way, when did the SIU become an issue?[/QUOTE]

LOL you are much dimmer than I thought, having a few class mates over at MEBA I know those guys are happy. They all know how cheap we are, freaking unlicensed made more than I did last trip. Shhh don’t tell me how good I have it.

My friends told me MEBA does have an idiot who thinks he’s a mobster for president that is responsible for us getting some free cash to build a new shiny Headquarters via the Interlake lawsuit, but my friends also tell me this thug is going out the door with a swift kick in the ass.

As for SIU, we all know, in fact the whole Maritime Industry knows we are the red headed step children of Sacco. We’re his trophy mounted on the wall, his officers union that has Sacco’s hand wrapped all around it. Shame on us for allowing this and shame on our leaders for taking us here. Now all we do is bid so low on contracts that no one else has a chance to get them. The results are we work for pennies and force the other unions to do the same, this race to the bottom is insane and you want me to vote for more of this…screw you pal!

Time we take our union back and put it back on course with the other respectable officers unions.

I say fire them all and hire Jack Hearns and the boys. My vote goes to:

[B]YES to CHANGE NOW[/B]

[B]National President: Jack Hearn [/B]
[B]National Secretary Treasurer: Jim Schwartz[/B]
[B]National Executive Vice President: Matt Hight[/B]
[B]National Vice President, DeepSea: Mike Wachter[/B]
[B]National Vice President, Inland: Tim Reid[/B]
[B]NationalVicePresident,Government: Rich Horne[/B]
[B]National Vice President,Great Lakes: John Clemons[/B]

Half baked truths from Bethel and the gang dreamed up by Hearnia (The “non-AMO rep” but PAID by them!)…you be the judge!

On the AMC website now:

[B]Transparency and Truth[/B]

This record will dismantle several Bethel campaign points intended to deceive you. The Bethel camp continues to try and misrepresent the AMC and “translate” or speak for us with misquotes and innuendo. They are caught in a desperate effort to mislead membership votes. Here are a few quotes taken from “Why Change Now” literature and followed by truths from the record. The AMC has the evidence to support these facts. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us or feel free to research the facts for yourself.

[ul]
[li]“[I]the only individual granted immunity from prosecution in USA v. McKay” (reference to David Merriken[/I])[/li][/ul][B][COLOR=red]Truth: Gremelsbacker immunity is mentioned on page 143, Vol. 12 of the McKay trial transcript dated December 15, 2006. In June of 2005, Thomas Bethel was granted immunity in a letter received by Bethel’s attorney from Mr. Robert S. Tully, Trial Attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice[/B].[/COLOR]
[ul]
[li]“[I]The truth is that Tom Bethel instituted meaningful changes in AMO election procedures of his own initiative. Jack and the AMC had nothing to do with it[/I]”[/li][/ul]Truth: Changes happened because of the AMC challenge (by Hearn and others) to 2006 election misconduct. The AMO Exec. Board denied this challenge. The denial was reversed when the Department of Labor investigated and then provided oversight for a rerun election. The DOL required changes to AMO election procedures. Hearn, Bartlett, and Mallon attended these negotiations in Washington, DC. New Election Rules were reported to the AMO membership on Nov. 8, 2007 by Robert Hayes, U.S. Department of Labor Election Supervisor.
[ul]
[li]“[I]The largest officers’ union[/I][I] – AMO represents approximately 4,000 seagoing members and applicants[/I]” and “[I]Under this administration, the AMO employment base has grown by 500 billets”[/I][/li][/ul]Truth: The 2010 LM-2 filed by the AMO states the number of members as 3425 versus 4,921 MEBA members. From AMO election mailer addresses, the union provided the AMC with 172 fewer Deep Sea billets and far less Inland and Great Lakes membership since 2008.
[ul]
[li]“[I]Frankly, we do not know what Jack and the AMC were talking about here. No one in this administration, no one on the AMO payroll, has ever filed suit against Jack or anyone running with him from the AMC[/I].” [/li][/ul]Truth: On June 16, 2008 a law suit was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Chester Country, PA, as Case No. 08-06327 in the Office of the Prothonotary. This was a multi-million dollar claim by plaintiffs: Bethel, Keifer, Gremelsbacker, Cree (and 4 former AMO Exec Board members) – and against defendants: Mallon, Hearn, Bartlett, Rousselle, and Harkins (the AMC 2008 candidates) [I]during[/I] the 2008 re-run election period.
[ul]
[li]“[I]Jack and the AMC know that the Hearn-AMC complaint was struck down unequivocally on every count”[/I][/li][/ul]Truth: On October 24, 2008 U.S. District Judge Martinez granted in Case No. 07-60209-Civ “Hearn vs. McKay” the following: “that the Court finds that Michael McKay is liable to the union in the amount of $77,639.05 and that Robert McKay is liable to the union in the amount of $104,539.06.”

[ul]
[li]“…[I]we reported that the United Mine Workers of America Pension Fund was flat broke,…that 120,000 mine workers would lose not only their pensions, but also their health insurance benefits. Jack and the AMC have made no further reference to Joe Connors or to the mine workers.”[/I][/li][/ul]Truth: If the Bethel camp did honest research, they would state that Joe Connors left the UMW in 1993 - long before events of their misleading report. We stand by Joe. Taken from the UMW Health and Retirement Funds - Executive Director’s report, February 23, 1993: “I note with great sadness the resignation of Joseph P. Connors, Sr. Chairman Connors served the Funds for eight years. He brought the Funds a superb background and thorough knowledge of Taft-Hartley trusts and an unwavering commitment to the mandates of ERISA. More significantly he brought fierce devotion to the beneficiaries…. His sophistication and competence in modern investment policy and practice are recognized by the entire investment community. It was reassuring to have his leadership during the difficult stock market crash of 1987….”

[ul]
[li]“[I]these two admitted felons went on to counsel Jack and the AMC secretly on campaign strategy in 2006 and in 2008.” [/I][/li][/ul]Truth: Jose Leonard is well aware that both Joseph and Kelly were not involved with the AMC campaigns. Leonard knows because he was heavily involved in the 2006 AMC campaign, himself.
Truth: Kelly was uncooperative and subpoenaed to appear in the civil case. In 2007, Bethel released Joseph from an $8,000,000 judgment for the AMO.
Truth: Bethel, Keifer and Gremelsbacker were among Kelly’s closest friends until they divided and the three supported the McKays for re-election.

Bethel’s “transparency” includes “confidential contributions” and contracts which are held secret. Were you aware when the name of our union was changed to “American Maritime Officers, SIUNA”? What else are they hiding?

The warning signs were there: Department of Justice investigations which led to convicted union officials and Department of Labor investigations which led to a new election. New warning signs are a failed pension system and spending out of control. The question is not “Why Change Now”, but rather When, and the time is Now.

Website: [U]www.youramc.org[/U] Email: [U]committee@youramc.org [/U]

There’s not enough Lipstick for this pig!!

Let me start by saying I am asking that whoever reads this post opens his mind and asks “what if”? I believe if one has ANY hope of securing his financial future via AMO, then the obvious answer will be “better change now”. I may be off a little in my assumptions, but overall I think I am right on. The reader can decide for himself. I have no horse in the race, except to say that I am pissed off at the pension fiasco, and I do not agree with the propaganda that is being fed to us by the current administration, who would have us think that they, the executive board and the Board of Trustees have no accountability for the failure of our pension plan. I call B.S.

I have read every post on this blog and I have found them very interesting and informative. It is my I hope that more and more members get involved. Call your friends, send out emails – this may be the last chance you will EVER have to protect (what’s left of) your financial future with AMO!

For me, the question of whom I should vote for is simple and in spite of what the Bethel camp says, it is not about “the jobs” and the security that a broad job base provides. There’s an old saying that goes “if you want to kill the snake, cut off its head”. Anyone who is pissed off about the whole retirement and pension plan issue, as well as who was guilty, who was granted immunity, or quite simply who is left that stood by as the membership was ruled with an iron fist; then quite simply, GET RID OF THEM ALL, and start over. Think about it. We have all seen some of the low wage contracts that we have been forced to work under. Do we really need to worry that much about who is negotiating for us in the future when we have already established that we are willing to work for less than MEBA I Officers? Roll the dice; you’ve already been screwed by the mismanagement and subsequent loss of your pension funds. Clean house now before it gets any worse. Imagine what might happen if the markets crash again. The Bethel camp is re-elected with no worries for a number of years (maybe this time they’ll ram a resolution down our throats that will allow them to remain in office for 10 years). At any rate, the market crashes again. We all know by now that Bethel and company (and others with seniority) will receive the highest contributions to the DC Plan. Unfortunately for them, they have to wait until an actuary decides that the DB plan is fully funded, and then they can start enjoying their next pension! Why wait for the 7 years (+ or -)? Why not declare another “emergency” and reduce the monthly checks for the retirees, thus paying off the DB Plan sooner? Oh sure, they would NEVER do that; just ask them. Personally, after monitoring some of the decisions made by the current administration, I would be surprised if they DON’T do such a thing. Remember, regarding pension plan funding levels, the AMO trustees sent a letter to the members on January 26th 2009 claiming an “Accumulated Funding Deficiency does not exist and is not projected to occur within the next seven plan years.” Only three months later on April 23rd, the AMO Plans Executive Director stated in the online edition of AMO Currents “From October 2007 through the first part of April 2009, the AMO Pension Plan has lost $160 million.”

This seems impossible when the Trustees are required to “review” the investment manager’s performance on a quarterly basis. Either we need to issue AMO calendars to the trustees, or we need to question “why were they asleep at the wheel as our pension fund was decimated?”. YOU DECIDE and then SHOW your anger with your vote. You can’t do much worse than what you have now. I can’t say that I know Jack Hearn, but I have had many sailors tell me that he IS the finest Skipper they have sailed with and that his integrity is unquestioned. Here’s what I’ll say about Jack; it seems to me that he’d be better off sitting back and waiting for the new DC Plan to kick in. After all, he already got his buyout, so where is his horse in the race? It could very well be that he is what he says he is; someone who wants to work for the membership, and “right” the “wrongs” that have been done to us for soooooo many years. Food for thought, cuz’ otherwise all of the headaches can’t be worth it.

Aside from those who enjoy being away from their families for months at a time, while dodging hurricanes and avoiding pirates, the rest of us went to sea with the expectation of high wages, long vacations – and a better retirement than was available to shoreside workers. Adding to the incentive was the “Buyout” and if not that, a monthly retirement check much greater than our friends ashore.

The Bethel camp claims the tremendous losses suffered by our pension plan were “inevitable” and that all investors suffered (exact wording can be found in a previous edition of the online version of AMO Currents). On the contrary, many investors fared quite well during the financial meltdown and there were numerous well known economists who correctly predicted the crash (see Nouriel Roubini and Meredith Whitney). When questioned regarding the fact that the AMO financial advisors did nothing to protect our investments, Bethel told members that an institution such as a pension plan could not “speculate” with the money. The obvious result was the Trustees had no choice but to stand by and watch as our hard earned pension fund was decimated – again I say “B.S.”. Worse than that, as far as I know, we are still using the same financial advisors that lost the money in the first place! NO accountability - and now we’re screwed. Personally, I believe there were alternatives that could have been taken to protect our pension fund. However, since AMO officials have become so accustomed to lying to the membership with NO repercussions, this answer provided an easy way to avoid acknowledging responsibility for the negligence and lack of due diligence on the part of the AMO trustees.
I understand the fact that Wall Street is all about “joining the band wagon” and analysts are hesitant to go against what the mainstream analysts are promoting. At the end of the day however, a huge number of AMO members were permanently scarred by the tremendous losses suffered by our pension plan. Personally, I care not what other pension plans lost in the markets; I was not paying union dues to cover the wages of their administrations. I entrusted our union leadership, including the Board of Trustees, to make sure my retirement funds were secure – and they failed miserably. Like the Captain who goes down with his ship, whether it was his fault or not, I wish to see that all of those who played a role, whether by direct investment advice, or as a union official or Trustee who failed to do “due diligence” in monitoring and reviewing our finances, are held accountable for the terrible losses we suffered.
Meanwhile, from management’s perspective, both the union administration and that of the employers, it is ALL about the jobs. More jobs = a larger wage base supporting the union itself. For union officials the increased job base also supports the added benefit of matching 401k contributions (why do union officials receive this benefit and sea going members do not? Could there be a double standard? Why Change Now? Anyone who knows the history of Ray McKay and the jobs base, will remember that the number of jobs was more important than the wage scales. Heaven help a member who dared ask what his wages were going to be when taking a job. And ask for a contract? Fuhgettaboutit………. Ask the officers who first deployed on the LMSR - USNS SHUGART - when Mikey’s boy Micky was the Captain. Some of them quit out of frustration when they were not allowed to know how much they were earning, or what the vacation rate was…… maybe that was because the union did want the guys to find out they would suffer a 60% pay cut once sailing in international waters…… Have things really changed?? Why change now??

Ahhhhhhh, no worries any more. The current administration hangs their hat on “the new transparency” where there is nothing to hide. I will grant things are better than they were before – on the surface. In my opinion, once you get behind the curtain, things have not changed much. No matter how much lipstick you put on the pig, deep down – it is still a pig.
Not long ago, during one of the Area Meetings, Mr. Bethel badgered a Chief Engineer when he asked the simple question of why are AMO Plans employees receiving contributions in the DC (Defined Contribution) Plan when the membership was told the new plan would not start until January 2011? Funny, I do not remember anyone saying “except for the Plans employees”. Apparently, the reasoning is they work for low wages and thus should be entitled to this benefit. I do not begrudge anyone in Plans having their DC contributions started. What bothers me is, in this so-called era of “transparency and honesty”, why was the membership not told? A simple oversight? I think not, especially if one heard how Mr. Bethel was browbeating this Unlimited Licensed Chief Engineer, who by his license alone deserves more respect than he received from our supposed leader (anybody know if Bethel even HAS an engineering license?). I hope his bedside manner is significantly better when he is meeting with government officials; but at least he wears a suit when our previous “leader” wore a polo shirt, and not a nice one at that! Anyway, it certainly made me question the “so-called” transparency when something as critical as the new DC Plan was implemented behind our backs, regardless of WHO receives the benefits. If THAT information is behind withheld from the membership, then what OTHER critical information has been hidden from view?

Our union has been ruled with an iron fist for too long. We are licensed mariners who have earned the right to question leadership and receive straight and true answers without being “bullied”. In regards to the issue of compensation, it is unfair of anyone to say a union official should not be reimbursed for legitimate expenses on behalf of the union. At the same time, I find it amusing that the Bethel camp continues to argue the wage issue, when in fact it is easy to see that Mr. Bethel’s wages have increased significantly over the past few years. Plus a matching 401k, he already has a buyout……… nice wage package, not encumbered by the same limits of our contracts (plus the fact that part of our wage increase goes to fund the plans, NOT in our pay checks). I do not begrudge anyone a wage increase. At the same time, what message does it send to the membership that he is asking for their vote, when he can witness their pension plan going down the tubes, at the same time as he is looking forward to a second pension AND a nice hefty wage increase? Do we suffer equally? I think not. Why Change Now?
Regarding the new DC Plan, when asked why the membership had no say in the decision making process, we were given an answer that I consider B.S. (this can also be found in issues of the online AMO Currents). Let’s look at the choices.

First off, when the AMO Pension Plan was declared in the Red Zone as of 01 October 30, 2009, the Plan was in fact at a 71% funded level (check the facts if you wish). Unfortunately, for those of you who were given the bad news that you could no longer hope for a buyout after that date, Federal Labor Laws give pension plans a great deal of leeway and discretion, which is why our union leaders, executive board, trustees – whoever – was able to put the final nail in the coffin of anyone who wanted to continue working towards the buyout or a hefty check during each month of retirement (basis the levels established in the DB Plan – the value of the DC Plan remains to be seen, although I suspect our union officials will do quite well, regardless of what happens to the membership).

I believe that the “Perfect Storm” of the financial meltdown in the markets was the perfect opportunity for the AMO leadership to set our DB Pension Plan adrift, and at the same time set themselves up for an unprecedented “second pension”. Go figure.

In short, do your homework, talk it up amongst your sea going brethren, and give a lot of thought to “why change now”. In my opinion, either change now, or suffer the consequences.

Wow…I wonder what the “Hearnia” comeback will be on the last two posts. They can spin things any way they like but you can’t fight the TRUTH. The battle is getting the truth out to the voters. I’m noticing a lot more new members to this forum, and I like it. I love how the administration tries to play the sympathy card too: “Heard you got robbed.” YOU robbed me! You didn’t hear about it because you were DOING it. It’s time for this culture of fear and intimidation to end. It would be one thing if EVERYONE in this union was taking it in the shorts–administration included. It’s entire another when the administration is getting RICHER AND RICHER while the rest of us are left to fight over the bones. I’m not a history major or anything, but doesn’t this run against everything unions used to stand for?

We’re a nation of over 300 million people. We change our administration every four to eight years. Somehow we, as a nation, have survived over 200 years doing it this way. So can someone explain to me why, exactly, a union of under 3000 registered eligible voters can’t remove SEVEN corrupt officials and start fresh? Kind of blows a hole in the Illegitimate-Offspring-of-the-Old-McKay-Regime argument that we can’t change now or we’re even more screwed. CHANGE NOW OR FOREVER BE SCREWED.

awulfclark,

They’re comebacks are simply pathetic. Resorting to cartoon pictures, Kindergarten name calling, and “Mark your Ballot This Way.” We can certainly see the type of members Bethel is courting. What’s next “[I]Jack, your mother wears Army boots[/I]”?

I voted the day after my ballot was received. Not for any full slate, but for the candidates I felt were best qualified for each position.

Here’s a hint regarding my vote for the top spot…(from the ychange site) “Don’t Take Our Word For It”…don’t worry Tom, I never will again!

[QUOTE=Turk 182;42625]There’s not enough Lipstick for this pig!!

Let me start by saying I am asking that whoever reads this post opens his mind and asks “what if”? I believe if one has ANY hope of securing his financial future via AMO, then the obvious answer will be “better change now”. I may be off a little in my assumptions, but overall I think I am right on. The reader can decide for himself. I have no horse in the race, except to say that I am pissed off at the pension fiasco, and I do not agree with the propaganda that is being fed to us by the current administration, who would have us think that they, the executive board and the Board of Trustees have no accountability for the failure of our pension plan. I call B.S.

I have read every post on this blog and I have found them very interesting and informative. It is my I hope that more and more members get involved. Call your friends, send out emails – this may be the last chance you will EVER have to protect (what’s left of) your financial future with AMO!

For me, the question of whom I should vote for is simple and in spite of what the Bethel camp says, it is not about “the jobs” and the security that a broad job base provides. There’s an old saying that goes “if you want to kill the snake, cut off its head”. Anyone who is pissed off about the whole retirement and pension plan issue, as well as who was guilty, who was granted immunity, or quite simply who is left that stood by as the membership was ruled with an iron fist; then quite simply, GET RID OF THEM ALL, and start over. Think about it. We have all seen some of the low wage contracts that we have been forced to work under. Do we really need to worry that much about who is negotiating for us in the future when we have already established that we are willing to work for less than MEBA I Officers? Roll the dice; you’ve already been screwed by the mismanagement and subsequent loss of your pension funds. Clean house now before it gets any worse. Imagine what might happen if the markets crash again. The Bethel camp is re-elected with no worries for a number of years (maybe this time they’ll ram a resolution down our throats that will allow them to remain in office for 10 years). At any rate, the market crashes again. We all know by now that Bethel and company (and others with seniority) will receive the highest contributions to the DC Plan. Unfortunately for them, they have to wait until an actuary decides that the DB plan is fully funded, and then they can start enjoying their next pension! Why wait for the 7 years (+ or -)? Why not declare another “emergency” and reduce the monthly checks for the retirees, thus paying off the DB Plan sooner? Oh sure, they would NEVER do that; just ask them. Personally, after monitoring some of the decisions made by the current administration, I would be surprised if they DON’T do such a thing. Remember, regarding pension plan funding levels, the AMO trustees sent a letter to the members on January 26th 2009 claiming an “Accumulated Funding Deficiency does not exist and is not projected to occur within the next seven plan years.” Only three months later on April 23rd, the AMO Plans Executive Director stated in the online edition of AMO Currents “From October 2007 through the first part of April 2009, the AMO Pension Plan has lost $160 million.”

This seems impossible when the Trustees are required to “review” the investment manager’s performance on a quarterly basis. Either we need to issue AMO calendars to the trustees, or we need to question “why were they asleep at the wheel as our pension fund was decimated?”. YOU DECIDE and then SHOW your anger with your vote. You can’t do much worse than what you have now. I can’t say that I know Jack Hearn, but I have had many sailors tell me that he IS the finest Skipper they have sailed with and that his integrity is unquestioned. Here’s what I’ll say about Jack; it seems to me that he’d be better off sitting back and waiting for the new DC Plan to kick in. After all, he already got his buyout, so where is his horse in the race? It could very well be that he is what he says he is; someone who wants to work for the membership, and “right” the “wrongs” that have been done to us for soooooo many years. Food for thought, cuz’ otherwise all of the headaches can’t be worth it.

Aside from those who enjoy being away from their families for months at a time, while dodging hurricanes and avoiding pirates, the rest of us went to sea with the expectation of high wages, long vacations – and a better retirement than was available to shoreside workers. Adding to the incentive was the “Buyout” and if not that, a monthly retirement check much greater than our friends ashore.

The Bethel camp claims the tremendous losses suffered by our pension plan were “inevitable” and that all investors suffered (exact wording can be found in a previous edition of the online version of AMO Currents). On the contrary, many investors fared quite well during the financial meltdown and there were numerous well known economists who correctly predicted the crash (see Nouriel Roubini and Meredith Whitney). When questioned regarding the fact that the AMO financial advisors did nothing to protect our investments, Bethel told members that an institution such as a pension plan could not “speculate” with the money. The obvious result was the Trustees had no choice but to stand by and watch as our hard earned pension fund was decimated – again I say “B.S.”. Worse than that, as far as I know, we are still using the same financial advisors that lost the money in the first place! NO accountability - and now we’re screwed. Personally, I believe there were alternatives that could have been taken to protect our pension fund. However, since AMO officials have become so accustomed to lying to the membership with NO repercussions, this answer provided an easy way to avoid acknowledging responsibility for the negligence and lack of due diligence on the part of the AMO trustees.
I understand the fact that Wall Street is all about “joining the band wagon” and analysts are hesitant to go against what the mainstream analysts are promoting. At the end of the day however, a huge number of AMO members were permanently scarred by the tremendous losses suffered by our pension plan. Personally, I care not what other pension plans lost in the markets; I was not paying union dues to cover the wages of their administrations. I entrusted our union leadership, including the Board of Trustees, to make sure my retirement funds were secure – and they failed miserably. Like the Captain who goes down with his ship, whether it was his fault or not, I wish to see that all of those who played a role, whether by direct investment advice, or as a union official or Trustee who failed to do “due diligence” in monitoring and reviewing our finances, are held accountable for the terrible losses we suffered.
Meanwhile, from management’s perspective, both the union administration and that of the employers, it is ALL about the jobs. More jobs = a larger wage base supporting the union itself. For union officials the increased job base also supports the added benefit of matching 401k contributions (why do union officials receive this benefit and sea going members do not? Could there be a double standard? Why Change Now? Anyone who knows the history of Ray McKay and the jobs base, will remember that the number of jobs was more important than the wage scales. Heaven help a member who dared ask what his wages were going to be when taking a job. And ask for a contract? Fuhgettaboutit………. Ask the officers who first deployed on the LMSR - USNS SHUGART - when Mikey’s boy Micky was the Captain. Some of them quit out of frustration when they were not allowed to know how much they were earning, or what the vacation rate was…… maybe that was because the union did want the guys to find out they would suffer a 60% pay cut once sailing in international waters…… Have things really changed?? Why change now??

Ahhhhhhh, no worries any more. The current administration hangs their hat on “the new transparency” where there is nothing to hide. I will grant things are better than they were before – on the surface. In my opinion, once you get behind the curtain, things have not changed much. No matter how much lipstick you put on the pig, deep down – it is still a pig.
Not long ago, during one of the Area Meetings, Mr. Bethel badgered a Chief Engineer when he asked the simple question of why are AMO Plans employees receiving contributions in the DC (Defined Contribution) Plan when the membership was told the new plan would not start until January 2011? Funny, I do not remember anyone saying “except for the Plans employees”. Apparently, the reasoning is they work for low wages and thus should be entitled to this benefit. I do not begrudge anyone in Plans having their DC contributions started. What bothers me is, in this so-called era of “transparency and honesty”, why was the membership not told? A simple oversight? I think not, especially if one heard how Mr. Bethel was browbeating this Unlimited Licensed Chief Engineer, who by his license alone deserves more respect than he received from our supposed leader (anybody know if Bethel even HAS an engineering license?). I hope his bedside manner is significantly better when he is meeting with government officials; but at least he wears a suit when our previous “leader” wore a polo shirt, and not a nice one at that! Anyway, it certainly made me question the “so-called” transparency when something as critical as the new DC Plan was implemented behind our backs, regardless of WHO receives the benefits. If THAT information is behind withheld from the membership, then what OTHER critical information has been hidden from view?

Our union has been ruled with an iron fist for too long. We are licensed mariners who have earned the right to question leadership and receive straight and true answers without being “bullied”. In regards to the issue of compensation, it is unfair of anyone to say a union official should not be reimbursed for legitimate expenses on behalf of the union. At the same time, I find it amusing that the Bethel camp continues to argue the wage issue, when in fact it is easy to see that Mr. Bethel’s wages have increased significantly over the past few years. Plus a matching 401k, he already has a buyout……… nice wage package, not encumbered by the same limits of our contracts (plus the fact that part of our wage increase goes to fund the plans, NOT in our pay checks). I do not begrudge anyone a wage increase. At the same time, what message does it send to the membership that he is asking for their vote, when he can witness their pension plan going down the tubes, at the same time as he is looking forward to a second pension AND a nice hefty wage increase? Do we suffer equally? I think not. Why Change Now?
Regarding the new DC Plan, when asked why the membership had no say in the decision making process, we were given an answer that I consider B.S. (this can also be found in issues of the online AMO Currents). Let’s look at the choices.

First off, when the AMO Pension Plan was declared in the Red Zone as of 01 October 30, 2009, the Plan was in fact at a 71% funded level (check the facts if you wish). Unfortunately, for those of you who were given the bad news that you could no longer hope for a buyout after that date, Federal Labor Laws give pension plans a great deal of leeway and discretion, which is why our union leaders, executive board, trustees – whoever – was able to put the final nail in the coffin of anyone who wanted to continue working towards the buyout or a hefty check during each month of retirement (basis the levels established in the DB Plan – the value of the DC Plan remains to be seen, although I suspect our union officials will do quite well, regardless of what happens to the membership).

I believe that the “Perfect Storm” of the financial meltdown in the markets was the perfect opportunity for the AMO leadership to set our DB Pension Plan adrift, and at the same time set themselves up for an unprecedented “second pension”. Go figure.

In short, do your homework, talk it up amongst your sea going brethren, and give a lot of thought to “why change now”. In my opinion, either change now, or suffer the consequences.[/QUOTE]

Thank you Turk 182, I couldn’t agree more

[QUOTE=NewEngr;42543]If ships (jobs) come and go over time (first time an AMO rep acknowledged this) why isn’t the membership kept up to date? What’s the big secret? It’s one thing in a long list of the secrecy agenda.

The Interlake incident was truly unfortunate for their employees and AMO. However, AMO did not have a leg to stand on because they were not part of the AFL-CIO. That’s why we had to buy into the SIU and, more recent, structure the new pension plan to reward their members. $10 says Sacco, Augie and the rest of the mafia are collecting on the new DC Plan. It still boggles my mind that a labor union, albeit a smaller one, was not part of the AFL-CIO.

The MEBA’s job base has been shrinking, definitely, but AMO has the jobs that pay a junior officer $40k a year. That’s something to be proud of! How many cadets at the maritime academies signed up with AMO this past spring? It was likely a small percentage of the total as the drilling companies offer a great salary and benefit package. Plus career stability and advancement.

I’m just disgruntled that AMO is a half-ass union that will only become worse under the Bethel family.[/QUOTE]

Like I said before, shame on us for allowing this to happen and shame on them for taking us here. We have caused all the other unions to work for peanuts by assisting the companies to bid so low that no other union will even attempt a contract, the results are we keep working for smaller peanuts and we have forced the other great unions to work for peanuts in order to compete with us. This has become a race to the bottom thanks to US, period. Now these clowns want us to vote for more. SCREW THEM, we need new blood that will raise our wages. Bethal isn’t going to fight for higher wages, that’s to hard, easier to except the peanuts as his wages aren’t so bad.

[B]Why would anyone vote to continue this race to the bottom?[/B] This is way the companies love us, we are cheap labor and a bunch of fools.

I’ve been reading the different sites for this election and really enjoy the fiction that is posted daily on the “ychangenow” website. [B]DO YOU BELIEVE ANY OF THE MUD SLINGING AND GARBAGE THEY ACTUALLY HAVE THE NERVE TO POST? [/B]

If I was a dope (and I’m sure this administration thinks there are lots of them in the rank and file) then that silly cartoon would have carried my vote. Bethel looks so intelligent, strong…a true leader! Besides who would vote for a chicken? The sort of cartoons you would see in some backwards country about 80 years ago before a rigged election.

How about that blurb titled “Demagoguery” Is this how we counter what the opposition has to say? Can you call such posts professional?

Then you have the simple explanation on Joe as they have posted on their site but that varies from other accounts you can find on line when you search his name and election fraud. These are the guys who told us everything was fine right up until the bitter end then suddenly our pension was in ruins, they currently say our medical plan is safe and strong…do you believe them on that account?

It is difficult to figure out fact from fiction when it comes to the current administration but considering all the BS and lies spewed from them in the past it is not difficult to figure out which way to vote in this election.

I wonder how much that South Beach Cartoon drawing is going to cost us under “Offical Business” along with the top shelf drinks and top of the line meals incurred to go pick that garbage up?

When I read this from ychangenow, I felt like I was hanging out with the AMC guys. Maybe that’s why Mariner 173 objected. Or maybe he just didn’t get it.

Demagoguery

Demagoguery is defined as the use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power.

We are one of you.

Although this statement makes no sense, it is a recommended mantra in ‘How to Build a Cult Following,’ the manual we in the AMC use as a guide for our campaign.

We model our campaign statements using the same approach. Nothing we say has to be true or make sense, as long as it makes AMO members feel we are their shepherds, and as long as it incites people to direct any anger and frustration they may feel about anything at all toward the incumbent AMO administration, with or without cause.

As recommended by our manual, we also liberally sprinkle our campaign statements with hot-button words like “Corruption.”

We are, of course, not aware of any corruption in the incumbent AMO administration. Our leader Jack Hearn even testified to this under oath. But, we have a belief. We believe if we spread enough preposterous rumors and employ enough incendiary words, we can convince AMO members there is a crisis of character and leadership at AMO.

We realize there is no crisis of character or leadership, but some of us are angry and our leader is obsessed, and everyone on our slate is very confused.

Over the past year, we have figured out the catastrophic crash of the investment markets had a devastating effect on the AMO pension plan and the majority of defined benefit pension plans in America. We have also received the many bulletins and articles explaining the precise effect the crash of the investment markets and other factors had on the AMO pension plan, its funding status, and what the plan trustees are doing to address these issues.

But we have made it our pension platform to refuse to absorb any of the information put forth by the AMO and the AMO plans to assist AMO members in understanding the circumstances of the AMO pension plan. We find it much easier and more politically advantageous to spread confusion, anger, division and misunderstanding.

We are proud of our leader Jack Hearn for hiding in his cabin and refusing to participate in an open discussion about the pension plan and the rehabilitation plan onboard his own ship with the rest of the ship’s officers when AMO officials and plans executives held a lengthy and informative meeting about the pension plan there. We are also proud of Jack for slinking away from an open debate with Tom Bethel and hiding behind his lawyer.

We have found it simple to make unattainable promises to AMO members about retirement benefits. If we’re elected, we’re pretty sure we can just blame the incumbent AMO administration when we come clean and tell AMO members that our pension promises are unattainable and would bankrupt the AMO pension plan.

Let’s face it, coping responsibly with a difficult situation and standing to the challenge of difficult questions and difficult decisions is really, well, difficult. It is much easier to throw around the phrase “Secret Agenda” about something of which we have no understanding. We encourage AMO members to believe the nationwide retirement crisis, the pension rehabilitation plan and the collapse of the investment markets are all part of a sinister plot perpetrated on the world by the incumbent AMO administration.

It was a big let down for us to learn about the actual status of the Mine Workers’ pension plan from the Why Change Now folks. We were convinced spending 15 minutes on Wikipedia would provide the perfect solution for the AMO pension plan. Besides, talking about Joe Connors and the glory days of trade unionism made it sound like we actually know something about organized labor and the history of union administration, and we had a lot of fun watching Jack play at being a labor historian.

We had to fall back. Fortunately, one of our slate mates knows the pension rates guaranteed to some public sector workers. So we decided to just promise AMO members what the most esteemed public sector workers have for a pension benefit. We hope AMO members don’t figure out the AMO pension plan is not a city, or a county, or a state, or a federal government, and that as a private sector benefit plan is not funded by an enormous number of taxpaying citizens.

We are glad the AMO rag keeps publishing construction updates and photos of the new headquarters building. These updates remind us to keep trying to convince AMO members that the new headquarters building was not approved by a majority vote of the membership in a union-wide referendum, even though it was. We have been disturbed to find an alarming number of AMO members actually keep up with what’s going on in their union. It has been very hard to convince an informed membership the democratic reforms established by the incumbent AMO administration didn’t take place.

We have been left with no choice but to lie about the cost of the building and tell AMO members it cost ten million dollars, when the true cost is less than half of that, and was more than covered by a well-timed real estate transaction. But, still, it sure does make some AMO members mad when you tell them it cost ten million.

We know our pension promises will drain the money from the pension plan sooner rather than later. We’re not sure what to do about that. Honestly, we think everything at the AMO will really start to come unspooled about six months after we take office. In fact, we’re not really sure why we’re running for office at all. None of us is remotely qualified or has any experience that would be relevant to managing a union. But some of us are angry and our leader is obsessed, and everyone on our slate is very confused. So we campaign on.

We haven’t been able to say much about contracts in our campaign. Everyone in AMO knows rank-and-file membership committees participate in all commercial contract negotiations since the Bethel administration took office, and AMO contracts and the union’s job base have continued growing steadily. But, we did discover the breakdown for employer contributions to each of the AMO benefit plans in every labor package drafted for an RFP is identified with the phrase “Confidential Contributions.”

We realize these “Confidential Contributions” are only kept “Confidential” from competing unions and companies bidding against AMO employers on government and military RFPs. But we cannot resist tossing around the phrase “Confidential Contributions” because it sounds almost as sinister as “Secret Agendas.”

So we have made our contract platform no more “Confidential Contributions.” We now realize that, when we release the “Confidential Contribution” rates, AMO military and government charter jobs will start flying out the window as fast as our credibility did in this campaign. In fact, it might create enough of a crisis that AMO members won’t notice how quickly our pension strategy is draining the fund.

In the meantime, we quietly call our supporters and encourage them to spread rumors and misinformation on the internet using several false identities each. This is a trick Jack learned from the former AMO official and convicted felon who served as Jack’s secret campaign advisor. It makes it seem like there are a lot of people agreeing about the outrageous rumors and lies we are spreading. We hope these supporters will continue saying AMO members should be afraid to ask questions. If we’re elected, we won’t be able to answer any. We certainly haven’t been able to during this campaign.

It will also be helpful to our campaign if Bruce Keller and our other online supporter keep saying the incumbent AMO administration is a “band of ballot burning thugs,” even though three members of the incumbent AMO administration were elected from the AMC slate in 2006, and one was elected from the AMC slate in 2008.

We do realize the absolute worst thing that has happened to the most vocal critics of the incumbent AMO administration was being invited to attend meetings of the AMO executive board and AMO plans trustees. In fact, this invitation was extended to Jack Hearn several times. But he has wisely locked himself in his cabin every time an opportunity to learn something about the union or the AMO plans has been presented.

We are secretly relieved the incumbent administration has done such a good job managing the union’s finances and assets, and that the income of the AMO is growing, the union’s operating expenses are falling, and all without any dues increase or any other burden on AMO members. Of course, we prefer to take line items from the LM-2 forms the incumbents have made readily available completely out of context and advertise the opposite in our campaign. We just have to avoid mentioning that the sharp temporary increases in AMO’s operating expenses over the past four years were caused by Jack’s failed lawsuit and the failed lawsuit brought by the former and disgraced AMO plans director, whose attorney consulted with Jack’s lawyers in an attempt to gain some legal edge over AMO.

But it is a relief to know the AMO treasury is in great shape because Jack’s lawyer will probably be expecting a PHAT payback for all these years of election campaigns and election complaints and the frivolous lawsuit brought against the union. We also expect the high-priced consultants we plan to hire to run the AMO for us will cost a lot of money. They wear really nice suits and drive Italian sports cars, so they must be good at something.

The actual thrust of our campaign is to pit maritime academy graduates against hawsepipers, and AMO members with lump sum pensions against everyone else in the union. But, we prefer not to draw attention to this agenda.

Instead, we continue to misinterpret the union’s LM-2 forms and spread misinformation about how much Tom Bethel and other AMO officials are paid. It is fortunate for our campaign that the Department of Labor requires some legitimate business expenses to be combined with salary in the Pay category for union officials, and that travel expenses are listed right next to that number. This makes it easy for us to add up the two numbers and come up with inflated dollar amounts that are much greater than the actual salary of any official. It has also been helpful that Bethel’s predecessor as AMO president rarely left the office on union business. So when we add Bethel’s travel expenses to the combined figure in the Pay category, it looks like he makes much more than his predecessor did.

Although it has been patiently explained that Tom Bethel takes only a 3% cost of living increase and his expenses are dictated by frequent travel across the country and around the world to meet with AMO members, shipping executives, government officials, and labor leaders to create new opportunities for the AMO membership, we stick to our guns and refuse to listen.

We have found it incites great anger and confusion when we share our inflated numbers and misinterpretations of the LM-2 forms with AMO members. After all, nothing makes people angrier than telling them elected officials make more money than they actually do, especially in a down economy.

Our campaign manual instructs us that spreading misinformation, anger and confusion will incite widespread mistrust and can eventually reduce even the sharpest and most reasonable group of people to a herd mentality. We are counting on it. We are counting on all of you. You need us to be your shepherds. Listen to our lies. Believe in our belief. Elect us to be your shepherds. Be good sheep, all of you, and support the AMC.

Signed:

The unfortunate paralegal in Osborne’s office who got stuck with the AMC campaign this time around

Disclaimer: the story above is satirical fiction.

Mariner 173:
I don’t see any mud in this one from ychangenow. Satire stings, but the truth hurts.

Jack the judge, Jack the jury

Since his first failed run for the national presidency of our union in 2006, Jack Hearn has charged repeatedly that I am corrupt, that I somehow dodged the long arm of the law, and that my administration is a continuing criminal enterprise.

The most recent example was in an October 4 post on the campaign Web site managed for Jack and his AMO Membership Committee (AMC). In the post, Jack disputed my repeated point that former AMO Plans Executive David Merriken was the only person granted immunity from prosecution in USA v. McKay, the closed criminal case that resulted in the felony convictions of four former AMO officials and one former AMO employee.

Like the countless comparable Hearn-AMC statements before it over the last four years, this one defied the public record and the findings of an exhaustive six-year investigation of AMO and AMO Plans by the U.S. Departments of Justice and Labor. This statement defied Jack’s own testimony in a sworn deposition in February 2008, when Jack admitted that he had no evidence of illegal, improper, inappropriate or unethical conduct by me or by anyone else now serving as an AMO official or as an AMO employee. It defied careful and complete consideration of the evidence and the unequivocal judgments of federal district and appeals courts. This statement defied Jack’s frequent claim to an “honorable” campaign and the Hearn-AMC pledge of “fairness” to all AMO members, and it defied common sense and common decency.

I stand firmly by what I have said over and over again over the last four years – the only individual granted complete immunity from prosecution in USA v. McKay was former AMO Plans Executive Director David W. Merriken.

Here, one more time for the record, are the relevant facts – including my status (and the status of Bob Kiefer and Joe Gremelsbacker) during USA v. McKay, which I had addressed completely during Jack Hearn’s second unsuccessful run for the AMO presidency in 2008:

Merriken was an early target of the criminal investigation, and he was a principal witness in the jury trial of former AMO President Michael McKay and former AMO Secretary-Treasurer Robert McKay.

Merriken also sued AMO and the trustees of AMO Plans, alleging unlawful dismissal under federal “whistleblower” protection laws. Merriken lost on every count in federal court, but the case cost AMO – the union, not the individual defendants – more than $1.3 million in legal fees.

Merriken’s case ran essentially parallel to the lawsuit Jack Hearn and the AMC filed against AMO and against me and other individuals in February 2007. Like Merriken, Jack and the AMC lost on every single count, but the case cost AMO another $700,000 in legal expenses. At one point, counsel to Hearn and the AMC and counsel to Merriken explored the possibility of collaborating for mutual advantage against AMO.

Two of the former AMO officials convicted of felonies under separate plea agreements in USA v. McKay in January 2006 – Jerry Joseph and Tom Kelly – went on to advise Jack and the AMC secretly on campaign strategy in 2006 and in 2008. During the 2008 campaign, we posted emails confirming the cordial but confidential Hearn-Kelly-Joseph collaborations, and these emails are available again at ychangenow.com.

Days before this latest Hearn-AMC statement was posted, Jack and the AMC said flatly: “Bethel, Kiefer and Gremelsbacker were granted immunity deals from the U.S. Justice Department.”

Had Bob Kiefer and I been granted immunity from prosecution – as Merriken was – it would have been because the government had compiled evidence that Bob and I had committed crimes, and because we would have been valuable witnesses for the prosecution during the trial of Michael McKay and Robert McKay. But there was no evidence because Bob and I had committed no crimes, and neither Bob nor I was compelled to testify for the prosecution – as Merriken was – because neither Bob nor I was able to support the government’s case with testimony or with documentary evidence.

Had Bob Kiefer and I been granted immunity from prosecution, we would have been forced to resign our positions as AMO officials.

As I noted during the 2008 campaign, Bob Kiefer and I signed “use immunity” agreements with the Justice Department. “Use immunity” is essentially routine, a precaution for individuals summoned to testify before grand juries in criminal proceedings – “use immunity” protects against abuse and entrapment by overzealous prosecutors and reflects the safeguard against self-incrimination under the Constitution of the United States.

“Use immunity” means a witness cannot be prosecuted on the strength of anything the witness says during grand jury testimony. “Use immunity” does not shield a witness from prosecution on the strength of what other witnesses tell the grand jury or on the strength of documentary evidence compiled by federal prosecutors – “transactional immunity,” which was granted to David Merriken in USA v. McKay, is the only absolute guarantee against criminal prosecution in a specific case.

My time before the grand jury lasted only a few minutes, and Bob Kiefer’s testimony was just as brief. Neither of us was able to provide information that was helpful to prosecutors, and no one else was able to say anything incriminating about me or about Bob Kiefer.

If Jack Hearn were to be summoned before a grand jury in a criminal case – a shipboard violation of environmental law, for example – the first thing Jack would do would be to retain an attorney. The first thing Jack’s attorney would do would be to negotiate “use immunity” for his client, and Jack would sign the resulting agreement – even if he knew without question that he had done nothing illegal. And no reasonable person would ever refer to Jack as a criminal because of the experience.

Joe Gremelsbacker was not granted complete immunity from prosecution, and Joe was never charged with criminal conduct. But Joe’s circumstances were vastly different from mine and from Bob Kiefer’s.

Joe had been implicated in the case by Tom Kelly, who told federal authorities that Joe had burned ballots on his (Kelly’s) orders after the AMO election in 1993 – an election in which only two official positions were contested and in which there had been no real political threat to the two incumbents at the time.

Joe took the stand as a prosecution witness in the trial of Michael McKay and Robert McKay, but his testimony and supporting documentary evidence demonstrated that what Joe had burned on Kelly’s orders in 1993 were unused ballots that had been discarded because one candidate’s name had been misspelled. The flawed ballots had been reprinted to correct the error – all of which explained why two sets of ballots had been ordered for the 1993 election.

Had Jack Hearn agreed to a face-to-face debate with me – before an audience of AMO members, on his terms and with unedited video of the debate posted on our respective campaign Web sites, as I had proposed – Jack could have raised the immunity issue and played judge and jury directly.

But that would have exposed Jack and the AMC to immediate response from me, and it would have opened questions about Jack’s secretive ties to Tom Kelly – whose plea agreement in January 2006 was an admission that he had embezzled $35,000 from AMO – and Jerry Joseph.

But Jack Hearn and the AMC never wanted direct exchange on any issue. They have for four years preferred to level unfounded charges in the hopes that they would leave a strong impression and that my slate and I would not respond on time or not respond at all – especially at this late date.

On this specific issue, Jack and the AMC want everyone to believe that they know more about the law and more about USA v. McKay than the U.S. Department of Justice, more than the U.S. Department of Labor, more than a federal district court, more than a federal appeals court and more than the fair, intelligent seagoing members of AMO.

Let’s close the book on Jack Hearn, the AMC and this issue once and for all …

Tom Bethel