Dementia is a concern of yours is it:
Or when refers to Dayton as Toledo, but it was only in an address to the nation following two mass shootings.
1 Like
Have Biden take one.
https://www.livescience.com/61451-trump-cognitive-test-results.html
Remember the last election, when the now POTUS claimed Hillary was suffering from dementia, and that she couldn’t even walk, because of brain crabs, or whatever?
And yet here she is today, walking around, on talk shows, writing books.
ALSO, according to POTUS, she is the leader of something called the Deep State. Her chubby little fingers orchestrate a vast well-coordinated conspiracy of hundreds of individuals spread throughout the government and the world, her little cankle-legs running circles around POTUS and his minions, who are unable to defeat her. A ruler of a shadow government so powerful she defies imprisonment and draws fear in the heart of MAGAdom.
You meant that kind of dementia?
2 Likes
“ President Donald Trump aced a cognitive test designed to detect early signs of dementia, White House physician and Navy Rear Adm. Dr. Ronny Jackson told reporters yesterday ”
This Ronny?
“On April 23, 2018, the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs postponed a hearing on his nomination after current and former employees on the White House medical staff accused Jackson of creating a hostile work environment, excessively drinking on the job, and improperly dispensing medication…told CNN on April 24 that Jackson was known as “the candy man” inside the White House, according to around 20 people who brought these concerns to the Veterans’ Affairs Senate Committee. He would allegedly hand out Ambien, Provigik, and other prescription drugs “like they were candy”. CNN also reported that during an overseas trip in 2015, an intoxicated Jackson loudly knocked on the hotel room door of a female employee, so noisily that the United States Secret Service reportedly stopped him to prevent him potentially waking up then-President Barack Obama. Trump responded during a news conference the next day, defending Jackson as “one of the finest people that I have met”
Who was later endorsed by Trump for Congress? Quid pro quo’s abound… maybe that’s the debate we should see televised—just pick the least affected.
3 Likes
It would appear that in the end they were able to defeat her.
Ah yes, the 46th largest electoral college victory out of a total of 58, or as Trump has called it:
“I guess it was the biggest electoral college win since Ronald Reagan,” (it wasn’t)
1 Like
I know, right? But there are these guys over here that believe different…
1 Like
…and they have whole books and everything. Crazy, right? Because Hillary’s all demented and Quasimodo-like, cause I heard it four years ago on TV, right before an election.
Hey–what’s that sound outside? It’s a Swift Boat revving up!
If you think concerns about Joe Bidens mental cognition are a form of Swiftboating, then ask someone that specializes in early detection of Alzheimers to watch unedited videos of him speaking over the last year. I don’t get the desire to die on this hill. The convention hasn’t occurred yet, and you could literally run a flower pot and beat Trump. You have Tulsi Gabbard, you don’t need to run a flower pot.
2 Likes
I disagree that POTUS will be easy to beat. But I’ve beat that drum…
Here’s an interesting parallel to specialists parsing Biden’s mental acuity from afar. Firing up the Way-Back Machine to not long ago…
My personal term for the phenomenon of judging the mental state of a candidate is “Goldwatering”. My guess is several posters will now show how old they are by bringing up their memories of that election. But Goldwatering has been right up there with baseball as a great American sport since the 1800’s.
So far you have tried
- Running someone under active criminal investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Now you are getting ready to try - Running someone showing signs of incipient dementia that has already tried and failed to run for president twice.
I’m beginning to think Trump being unbeatable is not the issue here.
2 Likes
In presential elections I voted Democrat in '08 & Libertarian ever since. I would consider voting Democrat again if Tulsi Gabbard was their candidate.
Ditto on your opinion of the unfortunate declining mental health of Joe Biden. For the Democrats, admitting Joe’s mental health issue is like them ignoring Bill Clintons predatory actions against women & Hillary’s running a shadow email server & deleting her emails while under a federal investigation. At the time the rank & file Democrats felt it was their civil duty to protect the sexual predator & the obviously corrupt Hillary even though they knew they were in the wrong. As time passed more & more Democrats then distanced themselves from the guilty & eventually admitted they were wrong. Republicans did the same thing with W Bush with the middle east wars & will do the same with Trump some day. Its human nature to keep rooting for your team even when they are obvious losers. That goes for all political parties.
Well, to be precise she’s been the target of several investigation, all tied with politics, and correct me if I’m wrong, she’s not only never been convicted, she’s never gone to trial. Are we supposed to hold exoneration against people now?
I have no particular liking for HRC by the way. My estimation of her is that she is very bright woman with lamentable instincts to cover-up anything that might seem like wrongdoing. But that doesn’t mean she’s guilty of wrongdoing.
She’s a typical run-of-the-mill politician, and if she was evil incarnate she would have been convicted of something long ago. Geez, they’ve been trying to bust her for nearly 30 years. If they could bust her husband for a lousy blowjob, they could bust her.
But I don’t like it when people like the late Roger Ailes and the RNC coordinate and make up lies from whole cloth to Swift Boat anyone. The tendency to do so is in each party, but the RNC has dialed it up to plaid.
Abut the only thing that raises HRC above mediocrity in my mind is this: Putin has gone on record saying he wanted her opponent to win.
No, I was precise. She was under active criminal investigation by the FBI at the time she was nominated as the Democratic Presidential Candidate in 2016. That is not Swiftboating. That is a fact, and everyone can look that up.
You can have an opinion on the potential result of that investigation, sure. But given that the DOJ and FBI were all under the control and administration of Barack Obama at that point, I am not sure how that was ‘tied with politics’.
That’s old news. The point is that until ‘The Mule’, i.e. DJT came along, the respective political committees and major donors of the two parties primarily selected who would be the nominee, or the range of nominees with a chance of winning.
We’re not disagreeing on this point. My point is solely this: she was not convicted of the crime they were investigating. There wasn’t evidence to indite. Hence, she was innocent. Investigation does not equal guilt. What am I missing here?
That it was unwise to select her as the nominee to the highest office in the land?
An investigation by the FBI can end in several ways. One is an indictment, which leads to a criminal trial, which for what she was under investigation for can lead to imprisonment for several years. Given that, the trials can take awhile to conduct. As the FBI had not yet make their recommendation to the DOJ (Not that they would have indicted anyways) this process would occur while she was serving as President. This is bad. I’m not really sure what there is to miss? Maybe nominate someone not under FBI investigation?
Because she wasn’t indicted or convicted under a completely GOP-controlled government since.
But they did make their recommendation:
And it was only in the heightened environment of the weeks before the election that Comey wrote a letter he certainly wishes he didn’t to Congress.
Once she would have been elected—she wouldn’t have been eligible for indictment—right, just like Mueller said? So no big.
Ok. Well, good luck, and we will see in November.
Yeah we will, totes concerned about whether Democrats will fail to win the popular vote after winning it for last twenty years save for one wartime rally round the President election year.
