Acoustic switches - Why Norway's offshore drilling is safer than USA

What is wrong with these reporters, are they really this clueless?

If anyone still believes we must drill, baby, drill offshore – aside from Bill Kristol, that is, who wants to sink wells even closer to precious coastal wetlands – then perhaps it is time to consider again the potential benefits of nationalization. After all, there is one country that has established an unrivaled record for environmental safety while exploiting its offshore petroleum reserves. That would be Norway, which created the company now known as Statoil Hydro as a fully state-owned entity and still controls nearly two-thirds of the company’s “privatized” shares.

         The Wall Street Journal [reported  last week]( that Statoil rigs in the North Sea are required by law to  maintain special "acoustic switches" that shut down operations  completely (and remotely) in case of a blowout or explosion. The US  Mines and Minerals Service, under the industry-friendly Bush  administration, decided that rigs operating in American waters need not  install those switches because they are "very costly." At $500,000 per  switch, they now look like an enormous bargain, of course.
         What makes Norway so different from the United States -- and much  more likely to install the most protective energy technology -- is that  the Norwegian state can impose public values on oil producers without  fighting off lobbyists and crooked politicians, because it owns and  controls the resources. Rather than Halliburton-style corporate  management controlling the government and blocking environmental  improvement, Norway's system works the other way around. It isn't  perfect, as any Nordic environmentalist will ardently explain, but the  results are considerably better than ours.