People who have heard the lawyers lecture know that in the case of the Exxon Valdez a persons view will change depending on what information or which narrative they’ve heard. That is, under the surface there is another narrative, another point of view.
Yet some of the same people are sure their view Costa Concordia is correct.
Look at this thread;
Costa Concordia: the truth is rarely pure and never simple
Member @Antonio_Di_Lieto argued those who are willing to go beyond media coverage and judicial examinations will have a different view.
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.
Why is he seen as making excuses for Captain Schettino and this lawyer’s case for Hazelwood is not? In each case the argument is there’s more to the story.