What are they thinking? BUTT EFFING HIDEOUS!

this whole X-Bow thing is just getting ridiculous…they bow will fall off this ugly POS!

[B]Pacific Radiance Group Orders Pair of Ulstein X-Bows[/B]
By Rob Almeida On September 11, 2013


px121 ulstein xbow pacific radiance

Ulstein announced today that Singapore-based OSV operator, Pacific Radiance Group, has ordered the building of two platform supply vessels of their PX121 design at an undisclosed Chinese yard. The vessels are estimated for deliveries in Q2 and Q3 2015 and the contract includes options for two more vessels.

The Pacific Radiance Group is currently managing over 120 vessels worldwide including Latin America, Australia, Russia, Indonesia, and Africa.

The contract with ULSTEIN comprises basic design, engineering, and an extensive package of equipment.

The first PX121-design vessels have been operating in the harsh waters of the North Sea since 2012, and Ulstein notes that feedback from the shipowners has been positive. Operators are reporting that the vessels have higher regularity than comparable vessels due to their capabilities both in terms of station keeping and transit speed in foul weather.

Vessel Particulars:

Length: 83.4 m
Breadth: 18 m
Load capacity: 4,000 t
Cargo deck: 840 sqm
Speed: 14.5 kn
Accommodation: 30 persons
Clean Design (DNV)
Satisfying IMO’s SPS Code (Special Purpose Ships) for carrying up to 60 specialised personnel
OILREC class notation for oil recovery in emergency situations
Comfort class

Image: Ulstein

I like them, they look pretty sharp while in the water.

I’ll have to go with BEH…

I prefer the AXE-bow over the X-bow, myself. Much sharper looking! Also sort of a nice little throw back to the good old days of plumb bows, fantail sterns, and STEAM :slight_smile:

conventional bow is good a the dock, anchoring etc but has always been the wrong design for a rough sea

The Axe bow boats always looked to narrow for me. Crewboats ride rough enough as it is.

Looks like a spaceship out of the “Jetsons” to me.

Axe bow is good for crewboats, but not suitable for PSVs. I guess X-bow is among the best alternatives available for vessels of the offshore industry today. Of course there are some other wave-piercers as well…

[QUOTE=MariaW;120219]Looks like a spaceship out of the “Jetsons” to me.[/QUOTE]

Now that you mention it

I’ve been on the Viking Poseidon a few times, and its design allows for tons of space in the bow with little added structure. Awesome looking vessel.

Check this out. X-bow vs conventional bow.

//youtu.be/GJsogw9fHE0

I know this thread is eight days deceased but while we’re at least close to the subject of silly concepts in the maritime industry can someone PLEASE explain to me the difference between a PSV (platform supply vessel) and an OSV (offshore supply vessel)? Is there a difference or is this one of those silly European VS. American things?

THANKS.

[QUOTE=PaddyWest2012;121019]I know this thread is eight days deceased but while we’re at least close to the subject of silly concepts in the maritime industry can someone PLEASE explain to me the difference between a PSV (platform supply vessel) and an OSV (offshore supply vessel)? Is there a difference or is this one of those silly European VS. American things?

THANKS.[/QUOTE]

Pretty sure that an OSV encompasses both straight supply and anchor handlers, while PSV means a strict supply vessel.

Just needs a spoiler and it could be on the MTV “Pimp My Boat” show. The bow looks like the inspectors nose on the Pink Panther cartoon.

[QUOTE=captrob;121024]Pretty sure that an OSV encompasses both straight supply and anchor handlers, while PSV means a strict supply vessel.[/QUOTE]

An OSV can mean any vessel that supports oil exploration, as far the the rules will allow you to, and based on imposed tonnage limitations.

A PSV is a “platform supply vessel”, typically means an OSV with accommodations that are much bigger and can sleep more than ship’s crew for special project missions. For example, can easily install ROV’s and sleep the associated extra personnel and not have to bunk with ships crew. The “P” Platform, means “working platform” besides just hauling mud and deck cargo. US GOM OSVs are beginning to follow suit with the new class of vessels, ones that sleep 40-50 personnel or so.

[QUOTE=anchorman;121110]The “P” Platform, means “working platform” besides just hauling mud and deck cargo.[/QUOTE]

I always thought the platform referred to the offshore drilling platform the vessel was supplying…

I checked DNV rules for offshore service vessels, tugs and special ships. According to the Norwegians, “OSV” stands for “offshore service vessel” that are vessels “designed specially for support services to offshore installations”. Platform supply vessels have special requirements for cargo handling arrangement and certification, and will receive an additional class notation “Supply”. Thus, they are used to supply mud etc. to the platforms. Then you have a specific set of rules for offshore service vessels for anchord handling and towing, not to mention all kinds of special service vessels…

So, at least according to DNV, OSV is an umbrella term that encompasses both PSV and AHT(S), and a multitude of other offshore vessel types. Out of your ten OSVs, six may be PSVs, three AHTs and the last one a well stimulation vessel (WSV?).

Still, other classification societies as well as the industry may have different systems.

[QUOTE=Tups;121113]I always thought the platform referred to the offshore drilling platform the vessel was supplying…
[/QUOTE]

Platform has to do with vessel capabilities, as all monikers for vessel describe.

Your thoughts are correct for the most part, OSV is basically the same for the Norwegians or the Americans - I have Master license for both of those flags, but I do not believe “PSV” is in any class rules, and more reserved as a marketing term for OSV capability. My information is more or less from the OVID question set - when the oil companies select PSV as a variation for an audit. The question set is different compared to a straight supply vessel, and at least from the oil company’s perspective (provided they are OCIMF, which is 99% probable), temporary fixed equipment - ROV/Dive, etc…is more of a focus and perceived risk with that particular variance, as well as the facility to install said equipment and associated personnel.

[QUOTE=Lone_Star;120433]I’ve been on the Viking Poseidon a few times, and its design allows for tons of space in the bow with little added structure. Awesome looking vessel.

Check this out. X-bow vs conventional bow.

//youtu.be/GJsogw9fHE0
[/QUOTE]

I was on the Viking Poseidon, as well as the Island Constructor. In my opinion, the X-Bow is a far superior design to anything out there. The biggest benefit is same as in the video, making normal speed in rough weather, staying comfortable, and running economical at the same time. Once you get more th 45 degrees off the bow, or holding stationary on DP, you lose the benefit, but you do always have that valuable space in the forward part of the hull - on the Poseidon with the nice conference room, and the Island Constructor has a large internet cafe and lounge area.