Navy fires captain who sought help for virus-stricken ship

Ah a fatalist joins the ranks.

1 Like

Ideal outcome at this point is to lower the R(0) of the fake news virus to less than 1. Nobody knows what to expect, hope for the best prepare for the worse.

1 Like

The USA was established by a bunch of whiners who would not accept the status quo. When the citizens of the USA cease to question those in authority and their decisions they will revert to to nation of serfs ruled by those with money and power just as that they rebelled against 244 years ago.

8 Likes

Somehwere up in the is thread several people talk about how Crozier’s action opened us up to attack from our enemies, albeit in a time of peace.

Yet Modly’s actions, which he admits were based on second-guessing POTUS45’s reactions, have now lead to one of our 11 aircraft carriers having a temp acting as captain, and the Navy having no Navy Secretary.

How prepared does that leave us? The purpose of leadership is to avoid chaos, not create it.

Watching certain people on this thread pontificate about military preparedness out of one side of their mouths, and then justify military unpreparedness by defending bureaucratic ineptness from the other side of their mouths, is like watching a bunch of 10-year old Russian gymnasts on meth turn themselves into pretzels while playing Twister.

3 Likes

Eddie Gallagher wasn’t pardoned and nor was he convicted of war crimes. Capt. Crozier wasn’t fired for what he said, he was fired for how he said it.

Perhaps if

They should focus those concerns on gathering facts instead of mearly what’s fed to them by their favorite {media outlet without considering the bias of that outlet}*. This will aid in applying

to determine how they feel about these situations. At the end of that process one might still disagree with the decisions made which is fine.

*-edited out the well used but apparently confusing acronym MSM as some expressed needing ‘help’ with that concept.

1 Like

I have often wondered. Who are the MSM outlets? Can someone please list them? It seems whenever there is a difference of opinion it is blamed on some MSM outlet rather than facts.I’d rather avoid all these MSM outlets as they seem to be FOS.

3 Likes

The purpose of the military is to be prepared at any time for war. How does having one of our 11 carriers limping along with a temp captain and a sick crew, as well as having a Navy without a Navy Secretary, help us be prepared for war?

Just because we have a reality TV star as president doesn’t mean reality TV logic is in play here…

You could be right about the Navy seal, I didn’t pay that much attention to the details in that case. Should have used different terms.

As far as sources of info, if it’s something that I find interesting I usually try to dig in a little deeper then the mass media. For example I actually read a condensed version of the Muller report. Trump didn’t tell the truth about what the report says.

2 Likes

I was aware there was a popular TV show several years ago called The Apprentice that was getting huge ratings. It starred a bombastic New York real estate developer hiring and firing people. I’m not a network TV watcher so I never got to see it however from what I can gather, it’s still playing but for a much wider audience.

5 Likes

In my opinion, a very important part of this situation is being overlooked. Captain Crozier’s letter found its way into the hands of the media and I have no doubt that this was by design. What is very disturbing is that he felt he had no other option than to take this very drastic measure in order for the situation to be addressed. That speaks volumes and it would appear that the Navy has issues with their culture. The spoken words and conduct of Thomas Modly only validate that.

Jeff Hagopian

4 Likes

Without getting into what the CO did and if I agree or disagree, I have a question.

How would this CO have acted if one of his Junior Officers or Senor Enlisted (from the EO on down) had sent this letter out? Think about it, what if one of those I mentioned feared for the safety of “Their” Crew and sent the letter out as they were not happy about the response they were receiving from the CO. I would be willing to bet that the CO would have brought them up on charges and rightly so.

2 Likes

We keep hearing Captain Crozier intended for his letter to be leaked but nothing about how it happened or who brought it to the San Francisco Chronicle.

3 Likes

I accept the fact what captain Crozier did was wrong but his immediate superior rear admiral (was it Baker?) said he was not going to forward the letter. The captain should have had enough smarts and network to convey his message higher up the tree.
What I find reprehensible is the politicians not following the chain of command. A quiet word from on high to a brass hat in the puzzle palace would have seen the whole problem go away. In this forum we should be aware of what happens when one crashes the chain of command.

Modly flew aboard the C-37B, a Gulfstream business jet modified for military use. The per-hour cost of flying it is $6,946.19 per hour, according to the Navy official who was not authorized to speak publicly. Flight time for the Guam trip was about 35 hours for a total cost of $243,151.

2 Likes

An interesting view from the National Law Review, saying that Captain Crozier’s removal from command may be illegal under law. Of course, it is just one lawyer’s opinion, and it doesn’t change his career arc (edited at …):

Captain Crozier should be fully protected under the Military Whistleblower Law that applies to the Navy. This law has a broad definition of protected activity, mirroring the Whistleblower Protection Act covering most federal employees. Under the law, Captain Crozier is permitted to disclose information that he reasonably believes could constitute a “substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.” The whistleblower law also allows Captain Crozier to report “gross mismanagement” committed by the U.S. Navy.

… In Chambers v. Department of Interior , the U.S. Appeals Court Federal Circuit held that health and safety-related whistleblower disclosures would be protected if there was a “likelihood of harm resulting from the danger.” The harm reported would also have to be “likely to occur in the immediate or near future.”

Brits also have an opinion I guess. To them, the US are a bunch of separatists refusing to pay their tithe to the Empire.

Now, we all work for the Federal Reserve! Ha! Guess the jokes on us at the end. We are all losers, some worse than others.

I did it. It was me.

Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

Poor guy. Paying the price for being naive and stupid.