Military Sealift Command

There are always jobs at smaller, lower paying companies with fewer formalities where guys can obtain seatime and experience. What type of jobs, how many, and when depends on the area of the country. It’s mostly a matter of being in the right place at the right time and ready to go.

Fishing boats and yachts count, and that experience is a lot more valuable than many commercial Mariners like to think. Generally, no documents are required for these jobs.

Don’t worry about pay or the details. Just take the job and get experience.

1 Like

[QUOTE=Capt. Phoenix;173704]You are seriously overcomplicating this. You don’t need STCW BST, you don’t need a passport, and you don’t need to join any union.

Get your TWIC, get your MMC, then find an OS job. Maybe the job you find will require to join a union like IBU but don’t join anything until you find a job.[/QUOTE]

Yeah but that’s for inland stuff. I have a “fulltime” job right now so I can’t really mess around with the inland stuff where you go out for a few days at a time as needed. My job is supposedly fulltime but most weeks it is more like 30 hours…but at least it is income I know I’m going to have.

Like I say, my ultimate goal would be to go out for a six month voyage on a container ship once a year and do other stuff (such as IT) the rest of the time. I have IT skills but no credentials right now. I’ve done it since childhood just never as a job. I talked to a famous IT firm and they said I’m “a promising guy” and “your UNIX command line skills are very impressive” but “we’re really looking for someone with CCNA right now”. CCNA meaning Cisco Certified Network Associate.

Really the container ships – and MSC – are what interest me because they go out to different ports around the world; its the adventure I’m interested in. If I’m going to stay in US waters I might as well concentrate on trying to do IT since it involves a high salary also. :slight_smile:

Plus I have mobility issues. I can get to San Francisco or Oakland on the train but I couldn’t get there at like 6 AM or something of that nature because transit won’t get me there at that time and I don’t have a car. Whereas container ships leave port and then come back several months later; you don’t have to get up to SF at 6 am each day. If I had to go there at that time say once every six months because that’s the time the container ship was leaving port, I could get a ride with somebody or stay up there overnight. So if I could sign up for the union and go up there on my days off to see if they have work on a container ship coming up that would work great. So that’s what I’m looking for as far as jobs at sea. :slight_smile:

Anyway…with STCW do you have to take the practical course, or can you just pass a written test at the USCG? Even though it’s been a while, I think I could pass such a test, if I studied, maybe take a practice test on the computer. That would save a lot of money.

[QUOTE=neutrino78x;173718]Yeah but that’s for inland stuff. I have a “fulltime” job right now so I can’t really mess around with the inland stuff where you go out for a few days at a time as needed. My job is supposedly fulltime but most weeks it is more like 30 hours…but at least it is income I know I’m going to have.

Like I say, my ultimate goal would be to go out for a six month voyage on a container ship once a year and do other stuff (such as IT) the rest of the time. I have IT skills but no credentials right now. I’ve done it since childhood just never as a job. I talked to a famous IT firm and they said I’m “a promising guy” and “your UNIX command line skills are very impressive” but “we’re really looking for someone with CCNA right now”. CCNA meaning Cisco Certified Network Associate.

Really the container ships – and MSC – are what interest me because they go out to different ports around the world; its the adventure I’m interested in. If I’m going to stay in US waters I might as well concentrate on trying to do IT since it involves a high salary also. :slight_smile:

Plus I have mobility issues. I can get to San Francisco or Oakland on the train but I couldn’t get there at like 6 AM or something of that nature because transit won’t get me there at that time and I don’t have a car. Whereas container ships leave port and then come back several months later; you don’t have to get up to SF at 6 am each day. If I had to go there at that time say once every six months because that’s the time the container ship was leaving port, I could get a ride with somebody or stay up there overnight. So if I could sign up for the union and go up there on my days off to see if they have work on a container ship coming up that would work great. So that’s what I’m looking for as far as jobs at sea. :slight_smile:

Anyway…with STCW do you have to take the practical course, or can you just pass a written test at the USCG? Even though it’s been a while, I think I could pass such a test, if I studied, maybe take a practice test on the computer. That would save a lot of money.[/QUOTE]

You are making claims and assertions without any basis in facts. What makes you think Inland boat work is just a day job? Have you talked to any employers or responded to any job ads yet to have any fucking clue what you’re talking about? Very few real work boats are day boats. Go look at tug boat jobs on Inland waters where STCW is unnecessary. River boats, ship assist, etc. Most of those jobs that I know of on the west coast are union but you join after you get hired. If you want to get the credentials to work on big ships you’ll either need to pony up a ton of money, wait on MSC to open an SU billet, or get the fuck to work to gain sea time. You’ll probably make more as an OS than you do now anyway…

You can’t get RFPNW without time on a vessel, even if you get the assessments done in a simulator ($$$$$), though as has been pointed out your Navy quals might get you that.

oh ok. But I mean the Basic Safety training. Like in this:

STCW Basic Safety Training $900

The main difference I see there is that they are using full body survival suits. I believe submarines have moved to those, but when I was in, we just used Steinke hoods. All a Steinke hood does is give you 40 pds of buoyancy, in order to escape from a submerged submarine. But other than that, I’m sure the “advanced firefighting” training I got in Basic Enlisted Submarine School is approximately the same.

In any case, you have to have STCW Basic Safety Training to even sail as an Ordinary Seaman if going outside of US waters, right? So my question would be, do you need to take a course like the one above or can you just take the written test for $150? Currently, my understanding is that you need to take a course like the one above, to demonstrate that you can do the practical stuff. But if I am incorrect please do correct me! :slight_smile:

At the risk of adding to your problems, to be employable outside of MSC, you may need STCW training for Security Awareness to be employable.

Yeah I saw that on one of the Union web sites. I would imagine that part can be done as a written test?

[QUOTE=Capt. Phoenix;173719] If you want to get the credentials to work on big ships you’ll either need to pony up a ton of money, wait on MSC to open an SU billet, or get the fuck to work to gain sea time.
[/quote]

Yeah, unfortunately for me I think you’re right about that, shipmate. Which, if that’s the case, I’m probably better off concentrating on the IT stuff. The financial barrier to entry is much lower and, like container ships, it pays very, very well, once you have the credentials. And you can apply to jobs by sending resumes. The inland stuff isn’t really what I’m looking for. :slight_smile:

Of course once I’ve been working in IT for a while, I will be able to afford all this stuff you need for the container ships. Then maybe I will be able to go on an adventure on there once a year. That would be awesome. :slight_smile:

But if it turns out that MSC has an entry level job, I’ll take that. :slight_smile: I’ll talk to somebody in person on Dec 3rd in SF.

You’ll probably make more as an OS than you do now anyway…

True.

[QUOTE=neutrino78x;173720]oh ok. But I mean the Basic Safety training. Like in this:

STCW Basic Safety Training $900

The main difference I see there is that they are using full body survival suits. I believe submarines have moved to those, but when I was in, we just used Steinke hoods. All a Steinke hood does is give you 40 pds of buoyancy, in order to escape from a submerged submarine. But other than that, I’m sure the “advanced firefighting” training I got in Basic Enlisted Submarine School is approximately the same.

In any case, you have to have STCW Basic Safety Training to even sail as an Ordinary Seaman if going outside of US waters, right? So my question would be, do you need to take a course like the one above or can you just take the written test for $150? Currently, my understanding is that you need to take a course like the one above, to demonstrate that you can do the practical stuff. But if I am incorrect please do correct me! :slight_smile:

Yeah I saw that on one of the Union web sites. I would imagine that part can be done as a written test?[/QUOTE]

Someone with experience in the industry might help better, but to my understanding STCW Basic Training needs to renewed every 5 years. I believe the renewal is either by documented proof of performing safety drills and the like, or by an approved renewal course, or even a complete STCW BT course.

The written test being mentioned is for your AB rating once you have enough seatime, and you are approved to test. In which case, you can take a written test or pay for an approved course.

Hey, shipmates, this web site seems to support my understanding that an STCW Basic Safety Training course is required even to work on a tugboat:

Basic requirements to work on a tugboat

If you go to his About Me section, he seems credible. 20 years of experience on container ships and tugboats, etc.

Also I went to the Crowley Martitime website, and looked at the West Coast jobs. They said a requirement for all employees on their tugs was STCW. Observe:

This is all done on well-maintained and safe equipment with the best people in the industry working to provide the highest quality service for our customers. Tugs operating in contract services typically carry a crew of 3 licensed deck officers (Captain, Chief Mate, and 2nd Mate), 1 engineer, 1 cook, and 2 AB/deckhands.

[B][I]Minimum Requirements for All:[/I][/B]

    USCG issued Merchant Mariner's Document or Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC)
    [B][I]STCW '95 (Basic Safety Training) or Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) with STCW qualifications[/I][/B]
    Drug free certification
    Transportation Worker Identification Card (TWIC)
    Ability to join/membership in IBU or MMP

Minimum Requirements for Licensed Deck Officers:

    STCW '95 including OICNW assessments
    USCG issued Mate 1600 Ton Oceans license w/ radar endorsement
    Prefer TOAR/Mate of towing
    Relevant towing experience

So, this information seems to imply that it is illegal for an employer to have people go out on a ship, even a tugboat, if they do not have STCW. I’m not sure if this applies to fishing boats as well but I would imagine so. If it is so small as to not require STCW, I would imagine that your sea time on it would not count toward anything bigger.

But yeah taking that course – assuming it does indeed require the practical course, which is what I believe to be correct – is not cheap. $900 for Basic Safety Training in San Diego, and that doesn’t include flying down there and getting a hotel for a few days. The $1400 course would probably be better because it includes more things. California State University Maritime is a lot closer to me – Vallejo, which is in the East Bay (east end of the San Francisco Bay) – but it is $1100.

Anyway like I said I’m more interested in the ships that go to foreign lands etc as opposed to tugboats. I was interested in the MSC entry level stuff because then they are giving you STCW for free. :slight_smile:

Shit since you’re now an expert why are you here looking for information?

1 Like

Out of curiosity, what are you expecting from containerships and MSC?

No offense, but this is starting to remind me of the feller a couple months ago who wanted to go on a containership as a deckhand for a trip to Singapore, so he could go backpacking, and then he would want to get back on at a later date when he finished.

Unless you have an uncle or father-in-law to get you a great job you will likely have to suck it up and take a shit job while you gain the knowledge, skills and experience to get the job you want.

That means no container ships on a six month on/six month off schedule. You’ll work as a steward utility mess cranking on Christmas or you’ll pay to go to a school.

It’s like me going into a Navy recruiting office and saying I want to enlist straight out as a master chief - I don’t want to start off as some low seaman scrubbing decks. The recruiter would laugh.

Grab a broom and start sweeping shipmate.

1 Like

[QUOTE=z-drive;173728]Shit since you’re now an expert why are you here looking for information?[/QUOTE]

You beat me to it.

      • Updated - - -

[QUOTE=neutrino78x;173727]Hey, shipmates, this web site seems to support my understanding that an STCW Basic Safety Training course is required even to work on a tugboat:

Basic requirements to work on a tugboat

If you go to his About Me section, he seems credible. 20 years of experience on container ships and tugboats, etc.

Also I went to the Crowley Martitime website, and looked at the West Coast jobs. They said a requirement for all employees on their tugs was STCW. Observe:

So, this information seems to imply that it is illegal for an employer to have people go out on a ship, even a tugboat, if they do not have STCW. I’m not sure if this applies to fishing boats as well but I would imagine so. If it is so small as to not require STCW, I would imagine that your sea time on it would not count toward anything bigger.

But yeah taking that course – assuming it does indeed require the practical course, which is what I believe to be correct – is not cheap. $900 for Basic Safety Training in San Diego, and that doesn’t include flying down there and getting a hotel for a few days. The $1400 course would probably be better because it includes more things. California State University Maritime is a lot closer to me – Vallejo, which is in the East Bay (east end of the San Francisco Bay) – but it is $1100.

Anyway like I said I’m more interested in the ships that go to foreign lands etc as opposed to tugboats. I was interested in the MSC entry level stuff because then they are giving you STCW for free. :)[/QUOTE]

  1. Crowley tows offshore. Offshore tugs require STCW, Inland do not. If you really want to do this then get in as a deck hand somewhere and get sea time. You can get your BST and RFPNW later.

  2. All STCW BST classes get you the same certification (and should cover the same topics), regardless of price. Go with the cheaper one.

      • Updated - - -

[QUOTE=PineappleOranges;173725]Someone with experience in the industry might help better, but to my understanding STCW Basic Training needs to renewed every 5 years. I believe the renewal is either by documented proof of performing safety drills and the like, or by an approved renewal course, or even a complete STCW BT course.[/QUOTE]

Beginning January 1st 2017 it will have to be renewed by course every 5 years in order to renew your MMC.

After spending tons of my own time and money on the innumerable courses required to be a licensed and properly certified mariner in 2015, I am really tired of all the whining from these wannabes about not wanting to spend a few hundred dollars for BST.

Can you imagine what some of these guys would be like onboard?

1 Like

[QUOTE=tugsailor;173733]After spending tons of my own time and money on the innumerable courses required to be a licensed and properly certified mariner in 2015, I am really tired of all the whining from these wannabes about not wanting to spend a few hundred dollars for BST.

Can you imagine what some of these guys would be like onboard?[/QUOTE]

so many not willing to make the investment now because it’s gotten tough…well the days of an OS waltzing into a 60k a year job are gone. Its very competitive, more so than ever. As tugsailor points out, even the seasoned mariner doesn’t stop investing in themselves.

i sailed MSC for 3 years as an AB and honestly it is what you make of it. There is a few ABs out there making 100k but they have no life away from the ship and they get on ships with berthing pay as well as ammo pay etc etc an AB on an oiler can make about 70-80k if the over time is available. As for the mate situation they are hungry for mates! As a mate its easy to move up and a lot of people who come in as mates sail until they make Chief mate and then bail out to another company. One of the worst parts of MSC is the time it takes to get your relief as an AB it can take up to 2 months in some cases and its worse for mates since they are so short handed. i might try and go back when AB opens up agian.

[QUOTE=neutrino78x;173718]

Really the container ships – and MSC – are what interest me because they go out to different ports around the world; its the adventure I’m interested in.

Anyway…with STCW do you have to take the practical course, or can you just pass a written test at the USCG? Even though it’s been a while, I think I could pass such a test, if I studied, maybe take a practice test on the computer. That would save a lot of money.[/QUOTE]

If you want to do the MSC thingy you will have to get, on your own dime, a:

  1. Passport
  2. TWIC
  3. MMC

The STCW (BST stuff) will be given by MSC. Again…LISTEN CAREFULLY…If you take it on you own, MSC will make you retake it again regardless of the amount time since you completed the sources. STCW is a practical and written course. The practical parts of BST has to be observed. You can not just take the written part alone. You will also have to be observed physically doing the First Aid stuff, life vest stuff, survival suit…stuff, swimming pool thingy, life raft stuff, all things associated with fire fighting, and so on and so forth, etc, etc, etc.

MSC will get you the RFPNW course during orientation. Even Supply Utility-men are given the RFPNW Lookout course. As an OS they, MSC, will see to it you completed the entire RFPNW assessment. So do not take the course on you on dime. It is a waste of beer money.

Ships are not like submarines. So don’t expect the Coast Guard to give you sea credit towards AB certification. It has already been tried.

And lastly, you appear to be miss-lead by the industry in general. This is not like living or working on a sub. You are spouting “Adventure” without understand how heavy, hard, dangerous and injury prone this job actually is/can be.

1 Like

I do not know much about MSC, but in general if you want to try going to sea, you will need to get:

  1. Driver’s license (most employers and the USCG require it)

  2. Social Security Card

  3. Passport (many small vessel jobs do not require it)

  4. Twic card ( not usually required on yachts, fishing boats, and some small tugs)

  5. MMC ( same as above)

  6. Vaccination Record Book (Yellow Book) with Yellow Fever vaccination (required by some employers)

  7. Reliable car. (Many employers require. They expect you to be able to get to work)

To improve your chances of finding a seagoing job, learn to cook, and be able to prove that you can.

As far as MSC goes, a significant number of people are rejected due to bad credit.

[QUOTE=Xavier6162;173753]If you want to do the MSC thingy you will have to get, on your own dime, a:

  1. Passport
  2. TWIC
  3. MMC

The STCW (BST stuff) will be given by MSC. Again…LISTEN CAREFULLY…If you take it on you own, MSC will make you retake it again regardless of the amount time since you completed the sources.
[/quote]

Cool, sounds like my understanding is correct. :slight_smile:

I was only talking about taking STCW myself in the event that MSC does not have anything entry level available right now and I decide I still want to try the surface ship thing.

I know STCW isn’t required for those little fishing boats and things like the Blue and Gold Fleet that stay in the San Francisco Bay, but those ships also don’t have crew cabins; everybody goes home at the end of the day. What’s the problem with that, you ask? Well, I live in Silicon Valley, which is 50 miles away from San Francisco on the southern end of San Francisco Bay. In fact I live in a suburb of Silicon Valley at the extreme south end of Santa Clara County. It takes an hour for me to get to downtown San Jose on transit and a total of 2-3 hours to get all the way to SF or Oakland. So it’s clearly not plausible for me to go from there all the way to SF or Oakland each day, especially at the early hour those boats probably work. Sure I could move, but until I do, I need to be able to get to work each day. Tesla’s production plant pays $17/hr, nearly double what I make now, but I can’t work there for the same reason; it’s in Fremont.

I didn’t realize this until today but apparently tugboats typically have a 14 days on, 14 off schedule, and they tend to live on the tugboat for that period. I didn’t even realize tugboats typically have racks! lol. So that might actually work, but the ones around here require STCW. Plus I’m really more interested in going out on The High Seas again.

And lastly, you appear to be miss-lead by the industry in general. This is not like living or working on a sub. You are spouting “Adventure” without understand how heavy, hard, dangerous and injury prone this job actually is/can be.

Ah but my friend, my shipmate, submarines are intrinsically dangerous. We get paid slightly more (about $100 more per month when I was in) than surface sailors because it is “arduous duty”. I’ve been in two fires on a submarine. I’ve gone all the way down past test depth (it is classified but “greater than 800 feet”). We had a leaking periscope one time. Another time we had a leak in the missile compartment (both times we were submerged hundreds of feet down). I’ve been in a class 4 typhoon that made the boat roll and pitch 20 degrees in every direction. Then when we went down to 600 feet we felt nothing (but of course we were in danger from water pressure etc). I’ve been on missions in which the Captain ordered the US Flag taken down since we had to run on the surface briefly but he didn’t want them to realize a US submarine was present. One time we heard blast fishing on sonar and I told the sonar supervisor, “isn’t that illegal in [the country whose waters we were in at the time]?” and he said “yeah but we’re not going to report it” and I said “why” and he said “because we were never here.”

I spent two weeks removing all nonskid from the deck, I spent a week sanding the DSRV surfaces, which we had to redo three times because the shipyard worker said it was not smooth enough. One time one of the sanitary tanks overfilled and we had to wipe human waste off the deck. 24 to 48 hours spent awake was typical, and one time I spent 4 days awake doing operations. From what I understand, that last part never happens in MSC since they are paid by the hour. Submarines have an 18 hour day, six hours on, twelve hours “off” (there’s been talk of changing it to a 24 hour day, 8 hours on 16 “off”).

You see, to me that is adventure. The hard work is just the price of admission, lol. Some men would prefer a desk job – and I certainly have the skills (though not the credentials, yet) to get a very well paying one – whereas others are interested in adventure. I am in the latter category. :slight_smile:

I read an old article in Navy Times where the Captain of an MSC vessel said it is good for those who enjoyed going to sea when they were in the Navy but didn’t like the Navy itself as a job. I’m definitely one of those lol! I was a PAPERCLIP…“people against people ever reenlisting, civilian life is preferred” lol. Look carefully for Navy enlisted guys who have a paperclip on their uniform somewhere subtle…those are the cool ones lol.

But then again, both of these careers I could potentially get into – IT and surface ships – require investment. The investment required for surface ships is a lot greater. CCNA, an entry level cert for IT, is a $150 test. STCW, an entry level requirement for mariners, is $1500. But if MSC has an entry level job available, I intend to pursue it, since I would not have to pay for STCW in that case. :slight_smile: If not, well, the surface ship thing will have to wait. I may end up never doing it. Let’s see what MSC says in a couple weeks. :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=neutrino78x;173764]Cool, sounds like my understanding is correct. :slight_smile:

I was only talking about taking STCW myself in the event that MSC does not have anything entry level available right now and I decide I still want to try the surface ship thing.

I know STCW isn’t required for those little fishing boats and things like the Blue and Gold Fleet that stay in the San Francisco Bay, but those ships also don’t have crew cabins; everybody goes home at the end of the day. What’s the problem with that, you ask? Well, I live in Silicon Valley, which is 50 miles away from San Francisco on the southern end of San Francisco Bay. In fact I live in a suburb of Silicon Valley at the extreme south end of Santa Clara County. It takes an hour for me to get to downtown San Jose on transit and a total of 2-3 hours to get all the way to SF or Oakland. So it’s clearly not plausible for me to go from there all the way to SF or Oakland each day, especially at the early hour those boats probably work. Sure I could move, but until I do, I need to be able to get to work each day. Tesla’s production plant pays $17/hr, nearly double what I make now, but I can’t work there for the same reason; it’s in Fremont.

I didn’t realize this until today but apparently tugboats typically have a 14 days on, 14 off schedule, and they tend to live on the tugboat for that period. I didn’t even realize tugboats typically have racks! lol. So that might actually work, but the ones around here require STCW. Plus I’m really more interested in going out on The High Seas again.

Ah but my friend, my shipmate, submarines are intrinsically dangerous. We get paid slightly more (about $100 more per month when I was in) than surface sailors because it is “arduous duty”. I’ve been in two fires on a submarine. I’ve gone all the way down past test depth (it is classified but “greater than 800 feet”). We had a leaking periscope one time. Another time we had a leak in the missile compartment (both times we were submerged hundreds of feet down). I’ve been in a class 4 typhoon that made the boat roll and pitch 20 degrees in every direction. Then when we went down to 600 feet we felt nothing (but of course we were in danger from water pressure etc). I’ve been on missions in which the Captain ordered the US Flag taken down since we had to run on the surface briefly but he didn’t want them to realize a US submarine was present. One time we heard blast fishing on sonar and I told the sonar supervisor, “isn’t that illegal in [the country whose waters we were in at the time]?” and he said “yeah but we’re not going to report it” and I said “why” and he said “because we were never here.”

I spent two weeks removing all nonskid from the deck, I spent a week sanding the DSRV surfaces, which we had to redo three times because the shipyard worker said it was not smooth enough. One time one of the sanitary tanks overfilled and we had to wipe human waste off the deck. 24 to 48 hours spent awake was typical, and one time I spent 4 days awake doing operations. From what I understand, that last part never happens in MSC since they are paid by the hour. Submarines have an 18 hour day, six hours on, twelve hours “off” (there’s been talk of changing it to a 24 hour day, 8 hours on 16 “off”).

You see, to me that is adventure. The hard work is just the price of admission, lol. Some men would prefer a desk job – and I certainly have the skills (though not the credentials, yet) to get a very well paying one – whereas others are interested in adventure. I am in the latter category. :slight_smile:

I read an old article in Navy Times where the Captain of an MSC vessel said it is good for those who enjoyed going to sea when they were in the Navy but didn’t like the Navy itself as a job. I’m definitely one of those lol! I was a PAPERCLIP…“people against people ever reenlisting, civilian life is preferred” lol. Look carefully for Navy enlisted guys who have a paperclip on their uniform somewhere subtle…those are the cool ones lol.

But then again, both of these careers I could potentially get into – IT and surface ships – require investment. The investment required for surface ships is a lot greater. CCNA, an entry level cert for IT, is a $150 test. STCW, an entry level requirement for mariners, is $1500. But if MSC has an entry level job available, I intend to pursue it, since I would not have to pay for STCW in that case. :slight_smile: If not, well, the surface ship thing will have to wait. I may end up never doing it. Let’s see what MSC says in a couple weeks. :)[/QUOTE]

A “paperclip” ? What the hell is that ? some kind of gay thing ? The USN that I served this country in Didn’t wear " paperclips " . Especially If you were in deck dep. Some BM2 would probably give you a quick tour of the chain locker for something stupid like that while one of the Chiefs held the hatch.

Of course you are talking about the submarine navy,180 crew go out and 90 couples come back.
Pull your head out" sailor ", (and I use the term loosely), The men on this site have started out the hard way and have put their time in to get where they are now. (without a G D paperclip), and For some reason, they are still trying to help you .
Heed their advise, or do it on your own. And stop knocking any part of this industry that you know very little about.
Your looking for an adventure ? Go camping with your paperclip buddies or find some far away land that hates our way of life, and go bother them.
You’ve got a long way to go sport.

Mikeboat

1 Like

Applying for a job at MSC is ‘fire and forget.’ The bureaucracy of MSC is so thick it takes several months to go from job application to first paycheck. Whatever you do, don’t wait on them to call. Apply then go do something else.

[QUOTE=neutrino78x;173718]Anyway…with STCW do you have to take the practical course, or can you just pass a written test at the USCG? Even though it’s been a while, I think I could pass such a test, if I studied, maybe take a practice test on the computer. That would save a lot of money.[/QUOTE]
You should be more specific than “STCW.” There are many STCW endorsements. However, none of them have written exams, and in general, if there is a requirement to demonstrate a skill by actually performing it or to get training, a written exam is never an available alternative.

[QUOTE=PineappleOranges;173725]Someone with experience in the industry might help better, but to my understanding STCW Basic Training needs to renewed every 5 years. I believe the renewal is either by documented proof of performing safety drills and the like, or by an approved renewal course, or even a complete STCW BT course.[/QUOTE]
The renewal requirements for Basic Training (and Advanced Firefighting) do not apply to the first time you renew after December 31, 2016.

[QUOTE=neutrino78x;173727]…So, this information seems to imply that it is illegal for an employer to have people go out on a ship, even a tugboat, if they do not have STCW. I’m not sure if this applies to fishing boats as well but I would imagine so. If it is so small as to not require STCW, I would imagine that your sea time on it would not count toward anything bigger.[/QUOTE]
Instead of relying on internet postings from unknown anonymous sources, try going to the source of the requirement. Note that this is the regulatory requirement. Vessel operators aree free to set a higher standard and may require their crews to have Basic Training even if it is not required by regulation.

[QUOTE=neutrino78x;173727]…But yeah taking that course – assuming it does indeed require the practical course, which is what I believe to be correct – is not cheap. $900 for Basic Safety Training in San Diego, and that doesn’t include flying down there and getting a hotel for a few days. The $1400 course would probably be better because it includes more things.[/QUOTE]
You’re apparently confused on what is required and what the courses entail. Basic Safety Training is a practical course. You put out fires, jump in the water, board and flip liferafts, and practice first aid and CPR. Are you sure the “$1400 course” includes more? I don’t know which one you are talking about, but I would be surprised if any course has significantly more content than any others, especially if they are both the minimum permissible course duration of 5 days.