No. Why burn food which the starving poor of the world are desperately short of?
Emissions reductions, as I’ve just stated elsewhere, is a diabolical myth designed to destroy western civilisation. Such reductions won’t change the climate, but will cost more and produce less efficient energy. In other words; stupid.
Noble idea. Who is going to pay for it?
The “starving poor of the world” don’t have the mony.
Maybe the rich people of the world will step in and help. They only have to forgo a few superyachts, private jets etc. and hey presto!!
Do you have any idea of how many working, blue collar, and labor class men and women are paying taxes, supporting families and countless suppliers and manufacturers by building, repairing, and otherwise supporting those superyachts and private jets?
If you believe in spreading the money around to working people you should be delighted that billionaires buy jets and yachts instead of buying politicians.
North Vancouver, B.C. –based Seaspan Energy reports that, less than two years after launching operations, it has completed its 150th ship-to-ship LNG bunkering and is now ranked seventh globally by LNG bunkering volume, according to the latest Lansdowne Moritz rankings.
Interesting arrangement. I wonder what the ride is like in that extremely forward house. I recall some really frisky west coast - Asia runs on the APL C-8s.
Extraction industries seeking to reduce their Scope 3 emissions are looking to maritime for help. Could new ethanol-powered Guaibamax vessels play a role?
Maritime can be a contributor to mining’s Scope 3 emissions, since bulk commodities are often transported by vessels. Shandong Shipping Corporation concluded an agreement with mining company Vale for new ethanol-powered Guaibamax vessels, which may help to cut carbon emissions by up to 90% compared to heavy fuel oil.