Despite plunging oil prices, Gulf on brink of boom

Remember I am only the piano player so don’t shoot me please!

Oil falls again as IMF cuts forecast; Iran hints at $25 oil

By Barani Krishnan 1 hour ago

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil fell as much as 5 percent on Tuesday after the International Monetary Fund cut its 2015 global economic forecast and key producer Iran hinted prices could drop to $25 a barrel without supportive OPEC action.

Genscape, an analytics firm that monitors U.S. oil stocks, reported a 2.6 million-barrel build last week in Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point for the U.S. crude futures contract, adding to the market’s bearish sentiment, traders said.

Trade group American Petroleum Institute will issue its data on U.S. crude inventories for last week on Wednesday while the government’s Energy Information Administration will release its stockpile tally on Thursday, both delayed a day by a holiday on Monday.

Benchmark Brent crude closed down 85 cents, or 1.8 percent, at $47.99 a barrel. It earlier touched a session low of $47.78.

U.S. crude settled down $2.30, or 4.7 percent, at $46.39 a barrel, after tumbling to an intraday bottom of $45.89. Traders said activity in U.S. crude was heightened somewhat by the expiry of the February futures contract as the front-month.

The premium for Brent over U.S. crude futures widened after Genscape’s reported build in Cushing stocks. The arbitrage was at around $1.50 a barrel when U.S. crude settled, after reaching $1.66 earlier.

Oil prices are hovering near six-year lows after a selloff on worries of a glut caused primarily by unexpectedly high production of U.S. shale crude.

An expected slide in the U.S. oil rig count in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of last year failed to boost sentiment on Tuesday as traders and investors remain focused on concerns of oil oversupply.

“Because we have record oil production now, the falling rig numbers are not creating an immediate positive impact in bolstering prices,” said Phil Flynn, analyst at Price Futures Group in Chicago. “In fact, they may be creating just the opposite impact; reminding us how poor demand is.”

U.S. oil services firm Baker Hughes Inc said in a conference call on Tuesday that the U.S. average rig count was expected to decline 15 percent in the first quarter from the previous quarter, and it expected to lay off some 7,000 staff.

Earlier data from Baker Hughes showed the number of rigs drilling for oil in the United States fell by 55 last week, the second-sharpest weekly drop in 24 years.

The IMF, in its latest World Economic Outlook report, reduced its global economic forecast by 0.3 percentage points for this year and next, projecting a 3.5 percent growth in 2015 and 3.7 percent for 2016.

Iran’s Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh said Tehran saw no signs of a shift within OPEC towards action to support oil prices, and that the industry could ride out a further slump toward $25.

Chevron reviewing staff levels around the world, ceo says.

[QUOTE=c.captain;151355]I don’t know, they can produce Saudi light sweet crude for only $10/bbl so even at $20 they make $$$ and then make up their deficits with taking all the money they’ve loaned out to the planet back. If they call in notes, holy Christ we are all in some serious deep doo doo![/QUOTE]

Reviving a dead thread here:
Thanks for the good reading. I could be wrong but I think there are two “break-even” prices: $10/bbl is from a production standpoint, meaning how much it cost to extract oil from the ground. Because OPEC nations fund their governments with oil exports, they have a much higher fiscal “break-even” price. I believe S.A. (and some other nations) need well over $100/bbl to keep their government budget from running a deficit. S.A. has a ton of cash in reserve so they can take the pain a little longer, or maybe a lot longer.

This might not be relevant. S.A. could not really care if they’re running a deficit. After all, the U.S. doesn’t seem to care.

Good news from Norway.

http://www.oilandgaspeople.com/news/1803/north-sea-boost-as-most-expensive-oil-field-ever-gets-go-ahead/

North Sea Boost as Most Expensive Oil Field Ever gets Go Ahead

Published in Oil Industry News on Monday, 16 February 2015

Statoil and its partners have submitted plans for development and operation (PDO) for Johan Sverdrup, phase one, to the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.

he PDO was handed over from Statoil’s chief executive officer Eldar Sætre to Norwegian petroleum and energy minister Tord Lien.
“This is a great day. We are delivering the PDO for the largest oil discovery on the Norwegian continental shelf since the 1980s. Johan Sverdrup will generate value of great importance to Norway through several decades. The field’s economy is robust also at current oil prices,” says Sætre.
The capital expenditures for phase one are estimated at around £10billion and the expected recoverable resources are projected at between 1.4-2.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent.
For the full field development, capital expenditures are estimated at some NOK 14-19 billion with recoverable resources of between 1.7-3.0 billion barrels of oil equivalent.
The Johan Sverdrup oil field is planned to be developed in several phases, Phase one consists of four bridge-linked platforms, in addition to three subsea water injection templates.
The ambition is a recovery rate of 70%, with advanced technology for increased oil recovery (IOR) in future phases taken into account. The development in phase one has a production capacity in the range of 315,000-380,000 barrels per day. First oil is planned for late 2019.
The partnership, consisting of Statoil, Lundin Norway, Petoro, Det norske oljeselskap and Maersk Oil, has recommended Statoil as the operator for all phases of the field development and operation.
The majority of the partnership has asked the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy to determine the final allocation of resources in Johan Sverdrup, based on the following proposal: Statoil 40.0267%, Lundin Norway 22.12%, Petoro 17.84%, Det norske oljeselskap 11.8933% and Maersk Oil 8.12%. The majority’s proposal for the allocation of resources is valid until the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy decides the final allocation.
“The partnership has submitted a very good basis for further proceedings to the ministry,” says Øivind Reinertsen, senior vice president for the Johan Sverdrup project.
"The Johan Sverdrup development will create ripple effects for the whole society. We look forward to a continued good cooperation with our partners, the authorities and with a competent and competitive supply industry. The field will need the contribution of many suppliers, like a complex jigsaw puzzle where all pieces must be in place before we cross the finish line. We are excited about getting started,” he concludes.
In addition to the PDO the project will also submit two plans for installation and operation (PIO) for pipeline transportation and the development of power from shore solution.

[QUOTE=Kraken;154675]Good news from Norway.

north-sea-boost-as-most-expensive-oil-field-ever-gets-go-ahead/"[/QUOTE]

I just love how my favorite Norwegian billionaire is squawking that he isn’t getting as much from this field as he believe he is entitled to!

I guess hubris exists with Norwegians as much as it exists with Americans

of course my big question is if a stable WTI at mid $50/bbl range is going to give Shell the cash and motivation to keep pursuing the Arctic which would likely require a stable $150/bbl to just break even? They may but I would think the shareholders would not be very happy. I wonder why we haven’t heard much from anybody concerning their plans in this very down market?