The Latest Piracy/Security Conundrum : West Africa


The source of PCASP (privately contracted armed security personnel) has been controversial over the past several years. Since the advent of this market in the security industry, much has been written and said about the effectiveness, training and responsibility of such personnel. Some of the major factors involved include the chain of command when using these personnel as well as their familiarity with the maritime environment and shipping.

It appears that the security industry off the West Coast of Africa will take even longer to mature and become cohesive due to the laws of the coastal nations involved. Today, it is quite easy to contract with reputable, well trained and vetted companies such as the Trident Group, Skye Maritime or The Alliance/Triskelion. These companies have teams available, trained and demonstrably effective.

Unfortunately, the requirement to use local security forces in the Gulf of Guinea – drawn possibly from local military – is fraught with risk. Over the past several years, there have been multiple fatal shootings involving embarked security guards on merchant vessels. In each and every one of these cases, the embarked security teams were from the vessel’s flag country military. Being that these teams, as the teams in West Africa, were/are military, their chain-of-command, tactics and maritime awareness are questionable.

The security situation in the Gulf of Guinea and West Africa is worsening. Unfortunately, the solution that has effectively contained Somali piracy over the past year is not available due to local politics. It is time for the IMO and industry advocacy organizations to step in and provide adequate protection to the merchant mariner.

North P&I Club Publishes Guidance on Hiring Armed Guards in West Africa

Tuesday, 5th February 2013

Shipowners considering employing armed guards to protect their ships from pirate attacks in west Africa need to be extremely careful, according to new guidance published today (5 February 2013) by the ‘A’ rated 170 million GT North P&I Club.

According to the Club’s new loss prevention briefing entitled West African Piracy, standard solutions and contracts for hiring armed guards on the other side of Africa, such as BIMCO’s Guardcon form, may be inappropriate for the very different situation in the Gulf of Guinea, Bight of Benin and Bight of Bonny.

‘BIMCO Guardcon has been drafted specifically in response to the piracy situation in the Indian Ocean and the circumstances found in west Africa are quite different,’ says the Club’s Risk Management Executive Colin Gillespie. A major difference is that private armed guards are prevented by law from operating inside territorial waters of coastal states in the region, and authorities are known to enforce these regulations vigorously.

‘Local laws require that armed guards should be from the local security forces,’ says Gillespie. ‘This introduces potential safety, security and political issues with the use of such guards, particularly if a vessel needs to operate in the territorial waters of more than one coastal state in the region.’

According to North, employment of local security force armed guards customarily takes place via a local agency, but the Club is aware that some agencies have been employing off-duty armed guards at less cost. This has lead to further problems, such as suspension of legitimate armed guard services by a coast state in the region.

‘Operators should therefore seek to ensure that the agency they use is employing local security forces that are on duty, and as such are an informed and legitimate part of local intelligence and military networks,’ says Gillespie. ‘All shipowners should seek expert legal and technical advice before entering into a contract to engage armed guards to protect their vessels in west Africa’.

Recent figures released by the International Maritime Bureau indicated there were 58 incidents in the Gulf of Guinea last year, including 10 hijackings and 207 crew members taken hostage. Unlike Somali pirate attacks, many of the attacks are against stationary ships and involve sophisticated criminal gangs operating across national boundaries as well as politically motivated militias.

The new briefing includes guidance from the recently published Interim Guidelines for Owners, Operators and Masters for Protection Against Piracy in the Gulf of Guinea Region developed by BIMCO, the International Chamber of Shipping, Intercargo and Intertanko.

[TABLE=“width: 100%”]

The Niger Delta[FONT=inherit]Militant groups and criminal gangs are challenging foreign oil firms and the Nigerian government over pollution, revenue distribution, resource control and jobs. Crime, lawlessness and youth unrest threaten personnel, investments and operations on land and at sea. We endeavour to explain what is taking place – where and why.
[/FONT]

[B]Niger Delta reports[/B]Our Niger Delta and Maritime Security subscription packs help you understand and forecast security developments in the Niger Delta. Our reports are equipped with facts, analysis, charts and electronic briefing maps. Each serious security incident is plotted on a map, giving you an indispensable visual overview of the security situation. The Niger Delta subscription packs are critical tools for anyone with a professional interest in Nigeria’s oil.

[/TABLE]

[QUOTE=RichMadden;97780]


The source of PCASP (privately contracted armed security personnel) has been controversial over the past several years. Since the advent of this market in the security industry, much has been written and said about the effectiveness, training and responsibility of such personnel. Some of the major factors involved include the chain of command when using these personnel as well as their familiarity with the maritime environment and shipping.

It appears that the security industry off the West Coast of Africa will take even longer to mature and become cohesive due to the laws of the coastal nations involved. Today, it is quite easy to contract with reputable, well trained and vetted companies such as the Trident Group, Skye Maritime or The Alliance/Triskelion. These companies have teams available, trained and demonstrably effective.

Unfortunately, the requirement to use local security forces in the Gulf of Guinea – drawn possibly from local military – is fraught with risk. Over the past several years, there have been multiple fatal shootings involving embarked security guards on merchant vessels. In each and every one of these cases,[B][I] the embarked security teams were from the vessel’s flag country military. [/I] [/B]Being that these teams, as the teams in West Africa, were/are military, their chain-of-command, tactics and maritime awareness are questionable.

The security situation in the Gulf of Guinea and West Africa is worsening. Unfortunately, the solution that has effectively contained Somali piracy over the past year is not available due to local politics. It is time for the IMO and industry advocacy organizations to step in and provide adequate protection to the merchant mariner.
[B]
North P&I Club Publishes Guidance on Hiring Armed Guards in West Africa[/B]

[B]Tuesday, 5th February 2013[/B]

Shipowners considering employing armed guards to protect their ships from pirate attacks in west Africa need to be extremely careful, according to new guidance published today (5 February 2013) by the ‘A’ rated 170 million GT North P&I Club.

According to the Club’s new loss prevention briefing entitled [I]West African Piracy[/I], standard solutions and contracts for hiring armed guards on the other side of Africa, such as BIMCO’s Guardcon form, may be inappropriate for the very different situation in the Gulf of Guinea, Bight of Benin and Bight of Bonny.

‘BIMCO Guardcon has been drafted specifically in response to the piracy situation in the Indian Ocean and the circumstances found in west Africa are quite different,’ says the Club’s Risk Management Executive Colin Gillespie. A major difference is that private armed guards are prevented by law from operating inside territorial waters of coastal states in the region, and authorities are known to enforce these regulations vigorously.

‘Local laws require that armed guards should be from the local security forces,’ says Gillespie. ‘This introduces potential safety, security and political issues with the use of such guards, particularly if a vessel needs to operate in the territorial waters of more than one coastal state in the region.’

According to North, employment of local security force armed guards customarily takes place via a local agency, but the Club is aware that some agencies have been employing off-duty armed guards at less cost. This has lead to further problems, such as suspension of legitimate armed guard services by a coast state in the region.

‘Operators should therefore seek to ensure that the agency they use is employing local security forces that are on duty, and as such are an informed and legitimate part of local intelligence and military networks,’ says Gillespie. ‘All shipowners should seek expert legal and technical advice before entering into a contract to engage armed guards to protect their vessels in west Africa’.

Recent figures released by the International Maritime Bureau indicated there were 58 incidents in the Gulf of Guinea last year, including 10 hijackings and 207 crew members taken hostage. Unlike Somali pirate attacks, many of the attacks are against stationary ships and involve sophisticated criminal gangs operating across national boundaries as well as politically motivated militias.

The new briefing includes guidance from the recently published [I]Interim Guidelines for Owners, Operators and Masters for Protection Against Piracy in the Gulf of Guinea Region [/I]developed by BIMCO, the International Chamber of Shipping, Intercargo and Intertanko.

[/QUOTE]