NTSB: Bulker Grounded Due to “Expectation Bias" and Lack of Communications

The National Transportation Safety Board released its final report on the grounding of a bulker near Philadelphia in the Delaware River, saying it believes the pilot made errors based on his expectations instead of what was actually happening with the vessel. Further, it cites poor communications as part of the lack of bridge resource management.

1 Like

Have not read an NTSB report in some time due to weak quality of most. Who is investigating and writing these reports? Sunday Sailors?

A dynamic and diverse team.

3 Likes

That is why it is posted hoping the competent ppl like Yourself can validate their opinion about Sunday Sailors.

diversity , equality and all inclusive team. Not a problem . Olds salts here will fish all the problems at a glance.

“Top. Men.”

2 Likes

From the report, the pilot intentionally steered the ship out of the channel. Is this a common practice? Why would he do that and take on that liability? If a pilot felt a ship’s rudder/propulsion/thruster capabilities were insufficient to keep the ship in the channel, why not insist on more tugs rather than put that liability on himself?

Are You an engineer ?

I am. Hence all the question marks in my post.

The content of your questions not the question marks prompted me to ask mine.

Thank You for saving my time as researching old posts to figure that out from 08th May 2010 would be tedious and time consuming

Also noted You have helped to bring the thread back on track initiating i hope interesting and revealing discussion .
THX.

I, too would wonder what the pilot’s thought process’ were - especially after the initial grounding. I found the display of CoE surveys especially interesting - I’ve found these surveys to be an excellent resource (they do little-boat harbors & channels, too) - I wonder why the pilot wasn’t using them?

2 Likes

In that area, it is. If you’re centerline in the channel up there, you feel like your stern is going to slap the shoreline every turn.

2 Likes

Do you predict after this incident that the pilots will require more tugs rather than use this ‘drive outside the channel’ strategy?

Not that I’ve seen so far and not that I see will happen, from the pilots I talk to they’re definitely all very cognizant of not cutting the turn under the bridge though!

I also don’t think there are enough assists in the area to support that, it’s really only 3 companies with a total of 12-ish tugs covering a pretty active 50ish mile stretch (Del City to the Del Air RR bridge, similar to how there just aren’t enough tugs in Baltimore for bridge escorts).

When we were dealing with ice earlier this winter, it was a nightmare finding an assist just for berth since all the jobs were taking 2-3 hours.

1 Like

I would expect certain information be included in the report and not have to comb through the docket. For example, the draft was even keel 38.7ft. (How does this affect handling characteristics of vessel.) More information on Master. (Report faults BRM but not explanation as to why he did not speak up until too late. Are foreign pilots reluctant to speak up with US pilots?).Why didn’t pilot tell Master he was leaving channel? Expectation bias from aviation and not maritime footnoted.Has there been studies in maritime on this phenomenon. Expectation bias for both groundings. Really? No record of past detentions or non-conformities.

1 Like

Have all the pilots. on this forum been jailed or retired for Gods sake.??

Have just compared their eloquent inputs on Ever Given, Ever Forward, Dali and many other nautical disasters widely and with passion discussed here and their silence is to say the least much more intriguing
than the joke of an investigation report presented here and due to my rather joyful nature I called it a joke as it rather deserves the attribute of a full tragedy.

Or may be and I am speculating here all the US pilots here and I know at least three, are so ashamed abt the conduct of their colleague and NTSB explanation of his bizarre actions coming with some bias bullshit.
The conduct of the bridge team I will save for dessert and for later.

I am so excited the report mentioned SQUAT but stopped short of expanding on the issue a little bit.
How about some squat calculation prior dep anchorage. Last time I checked voyage planning is BERTH to Berth.
What does the owners SMS procedures say abt it.?
Have seen few in my life and there are as thick as Bowditch bible. 100% it contains a FORMULA so thick headed idiot on the bridge can calculate it with non scientific calculator.

And wow !!! The best was from the pilot. “The ship was responding clumsily to helm”.
How did he expect it to respond when the ratio of dredged channel depth to ship draft was 40/38.5. ??? Surely he peeked at the maneuvering diagram displayed on the bridge.

1.5 foot difference between channel depth and max ship draft and going 9+ kts ?? Ohhhh and there is a foot note about echosounder!!! And they could not see the readings on the SVDR??? Woow!!! Glad to find out there are now paperless echosounder too. But even if there was the paper what would they see there and what they could conclude from the rubbish there??

And how was this echosounder set up??? range wise??? No clue?
I would check the echosounder tech spec and may be found that having 1 foot or about the transducer may choke with reflected signals on condition of course that the quality of the bottom was good enough for any reflections.

I understand that US pilot team here has preferred to keep a low profile under such embarrassing circumstances but such Champions like Alias 244 and Alias Ausmariner should have a FIELD DAY after reading such a shining example of " competence" across the board.

This is simply unbelievable!!! And where is Dr. Sal hiding? He seems quite voluble on such subjects especially when bloody foreigners screw up big time.

So far the best from the pilot after 15 minutes of conning the ship, which taking into account ships domain versus navigating conditions and phisical constraints was huge. " Capt what are the ship particulars?"!!!

Haaaaa,

This report is better than Catch 22.
Pity this pilot did not ask it after making fast.
Could be more entertaining.

NTSB could wait with release of this satyre till April 1st.