Mark Begich Continues Work to Prepare Alaska for Future of the Arctic

I am not ranting and saying Begich is crazy because the US needs a deepwater Arctic port if we intend to truly develop the energy resources there but since the major oil players like Shell and Conoco Phillips are going to be reaping ALL THE PROFITS should they not be the ones to pay for this and not the taxpayer? If the public does fund any such port then there should at least be royalties collected on any oil and gas extracted enough to pay the bonds off in 20 years. Plus leases on the land in any port should be let by public bidding rather than back room deals like in Fourchon which today is certainly the most valuable energy support realestate on the planet!

[B]Begich Continues Work to Prepare Alaska for Future of the Arctic[/B]
BigNews.Biz - Mar 04,2013 -
Introduces Deepwater Ports Bill to Strengthen Alaska Economy, Seize Arctic Opportunities

Citing expanding commerce and activity in the Arctic, U.S. Sen. Mark Begich introduced The Arctic Deepwater Ports Enhancement Act to promote the development of much-needed deepwater ports in the region.

“Arctic ports will have a big effect on the way we produce and export natural resources and on our ability to reduce high fuel costs in the region,” said Sen. Begich. “The ports will strengthen the Alaska economy by providing jobs and opportunities for small business. I expect the increases in shipping, oil and gas exploration and tourism to pave the pathway for greater economic growth.”

Sen. Begich’ s bill streamlines environmental reviews for Arctic ports by designating one agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to coordinate all the federal reviews, and sets a limited time for the government to come to a decision on Environmental Impact Statements (EIS). The bill also borrows a successful tactic Begich has used to promote Arctic oil and gas development by creating a federal coordinator’s office to ensure all the agencies are working together.

“Alaskans know that developing our resources means more jobs, more revenues, and more long-term economic security,” said Begich. “If we don’t take the necessary steps now to create Alaska’s foothold in the Arctic – other nations will.”

Because public-private partnerships will be needed to develop Arctic ports, the bill would give the Army Corps new authorities to enter into partnerships with private and local groups for development and creates a loan guarantee program to provide federal backing for private loans to port developers.

“I want to ensure that Alaska is in the driver’s seat here and that federal resources are available so they can secure the capital they need to get rolling,” said Begich.

Arctic communities were pleased to see Begich’s bill introduced. Denise Michels, the Mayor of the City of Nome, praised the bill:

“The City of Nome supports Senator Begich’s bill,” said Michels. “Given the increase in Arctic traffic from the Northern Sea Route, rapidly expanding offshore oil and mining development, the need for emergency and pollution response it is entirely appropriate for the U.S. Government to participate in establishing an Arctic port as a base for these operations.”

Sen. Begich has previously introduced several bills to support Arctic development, including legislation to bolster Arctic science and secure more than $35 billion for Alaska through the same federal revenue sharing program Gulf of Mexico states enjoy.

I agree. A real Arctic port is needed for a variety of reasons: defense; search and rescue; environmental protection; research; commercial fishing; tourism; and offshore oil development.

Prudhoe Bay is the only place that make sense for it because of the existing infrastructure with road access.

IF oil is found in the Chukchi Sea, then a port in that area will also be needed. Perhaps expanded facilities in conjunction with the Red Dog mine might make the most sense.

[QUOTE=tugsailor;102448]I agree. A real Arctic port is needed for a variety of reasons: defense; search and rescue; environmental protection; research; commercial fishing; tourism; and offshore oil development.

Prudhoe Bay is the only place that make sense for it because of the existing infrastructure with road access.

IF oil is found in the Chukchi Sea, then a port in that area will also be needed. Perhaps expanded facilities in conjunction with the Red Dog mine might make the most sense.[/QUOTE]

The thing about a seaport near Prudoe is that it is so far from the direct searoute via the Bering Strait. Since all of the cargo to support the offshore will have to come by sea one way or the other, wouldn’t it be better to have any port near Point Hope where the original idea was in the 1950’s when they were going to use a series of nuclear devices to do the heavy excavation?

Too bad they didn’t do this back when it was politically acceptable.

[QUOTE=c.captain;102451]

Too bad they didn’t do this back when it was politically acceptable.[/QUOTE]

Hold out enough federal funding and the gang in Juneau will be delighted to accept it. Hell, they will even call it patriotic.

[QUOTE=Steamer;102468]Hold out enough federal funding and the gang in Juneau will be delighted to accept it. Hell, they will even call it patriotic.[/QUOTE]

considering 30B+ BOE in the Chukchi Sea alone, the investment would be one that the nation would benefit from and certainly would be a boon to companies like Crowley, Saltchuck, Brice and Northland. I am a huge proponent for spending the money to build such a port but granting the royalty relief to the big players is where I draw the line. It is time that the major energy companies pay back to the public for the resources they make such massive profits off of and one way or the other, they should bear the cost of any such project.

When the Arctic does pop, it is going to be one very loud BANG indeed! Now, to get Shell to realize they cannot operate as the fucking circus they have been and be professionals up there with a new way of working. No more running the show like it’s just an extension of the goddamned GoM!

Did some work up in the Chukchi 3 years ago for one of the two majors, and plans were already in the works. Wainwright’s vision was to deepen/widen the inlet and build a 1000’ pier in anticipation of supporting future offshore activities.

[QUOTE=c.captain;102451]The thing about a seaport near Prudoe is that it is so far from the direct searoute via the Bering Strait. Since all of the cargo to support the offshore will have to come by sea one way or the other, wouldn’t it be better to have any port near Point Hope where the original idea was in the 1950’s when they were going to use a series of nuclear devices to do the heavy excavation?

Too bad they didn’t do this back when it was politically acceptable.[/QUOTE]

The 1972 established North Slope Borough extends from just below Point Hope across the top of the state to the Canadian border. It may now include the Project Chariot area. Certainly a factor in planning future sites. This borough has done very well financially from oil and will likely support new development. Barrow, the headquarters of this 90,000+ sq. mile borough has on more than one occasion, purchased an entire high school basketball teams’ round trip air travel for a visit and a week-end of games. An expensive act, one that included boys and girls teams, chaperones and coaches. Great local entertainment and an experience these young Alaskans will never forget. It is said they are the richest borough in the nation. I do not know that for sure, but they are sitting on a hell of alot of oil.