Interior Secretary: 'Shell screwed up'

[B][FONT=inherit]Interior secretary: ‘Shell screwed up’ drilling in Alaska Arctic[/B]

[FONT=inherit]Published: March 14, 2013 Updated 5 hours ago[/FONT]
[/FONT][FONT=inherit][FONT=inherit]

[/FONT]
[FONT=inherit]By SEAN COCKERHAM — Anchorage Daily News[/FONT]
[FONT=inherit]WASHINGTON – Shell failed to oversee contractors that were central to its bungled efforts to explore for oil in the Arctic waters off Alaska last year, the Interior Department has concluded.
“Shell screwed up in 2012,” said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.
Salazar, whose agency released a review of Shell’s efforts Thursday, said the company won’t be allowed to drill again off the Arctic coast until it presents a plan showing that it can better handle conditions there.
The Interior Department’s report said Shell’s problems have raised serious questions about its ability to operate safely and responsibly in the challenging conditions off Alaska. The report said Shell entered the drilling season “not fully prepared in terms of fabricating and testing certain critical systems and establishing the scope of its operational plans.”
“One of the recurring themes that we identified throughout the review was the failure on the part of Shell to oversee contractors that they relied on for critical components of their operations,” Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Director Tommy Beaudreau, who led the probe for the Interior Department, said in a conference call with reporters.
Shell already has dropped plans to drill in the coming year in the wake of the problems. But the company promises to return to Arctic waters at a "later stage."
Shell spokesman Curtis Smith said Thursday that the company appreciates the Interior Department’s review and takes the findings seriously.
“Consistent with our recent decision to pause our 2013 drilling program, we will use this time to apply lessons learned from this review, the ongoing Coast Guard investigation and our own assessment of opportunities to further improve Shell’s exploration program offshore Alaska,” Smith said in an email. "Alaska remains a high-potential area over the long-term, and we remain committed to drilling there safely, again."
The Interior Department review is just one of the investigations Shell is facing.
The Justice Department is probing 16 safety and environmental violations the Coast Guard found on the Noble Discoverer, one of two Arctic drilling rigs Shell is using. It’s owned and operated by Shell contractor Noble Corp.
The Coast Guard also is investigating the circumstances of the Dec. 31 grounding of Shell’s other Arctic drilling rig, the Kulluk. It was being towed by Shell contractor Edison Chouest Offshore at the time.
Shell and contractor Superior Energy Services also had repeated problems getting its oil spill containment barge ready. At one point the containment dome on the barge was “crushed like a beer can” in testing in the waters off Washington state, according to regulators.
Beaudreau said Shell also had problems working with contractors on emissions controls. The Environmental Protection Agency says both Shell drilling rigs ended up in violation of air-quality standards.
The Interior Department said Shell will need to submit a plan describing every phase of its operations before it can drill in the waters off Alaska again. Shell also will have to complete an audit demonstrating it’s ready for the conditions found in the Arctic.
The question is whether the Interior Department will hold Shell to those standards, said Marilyn Heiman, director of the Pew Environment Group’s U.S. Arctic Program.
“Their recommendations are good. But the proof will be in how they implement them,” she said. "We are hoping for rigorous oversight."
It was the Interior Department that allowed Shell last year to become the first company in two decades to drill in Arctic waters. But the government did not find fault with its own oversight, despite Shell’s failures.
Salazar noted that Shell was only allowed to do preparatory drilling. Salazar’s agency did not allow Shell to drill deep enough to hit oil, he emphasized, because of the problems with its spill containment barge.
Salazar said the Obama administration is not backing away from its support of oil exploration in the Arctic.
The Interior Department said Shell was able to drill sections of two wells in the Arctic Ocean last year without significant injuries or spills. The company also responded effectively to changing ice conditions and coordinated well with Native communities, it said.
“Shell was very cooperative in this review and has acknowledged some of these contractor oversight issues,” said Deputy Interior Secretary David Hayes.

Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2013/03/14/2825666/interior-department-shell-screwed.html#storylink=cpy
[/FONT]
[/FONT]

What is the status on Kulluk? Still in Dutch? Gone?

[QUOTE=tugsailor;102745]What is the status on Kulluk? Still in Dutch? Gone?[/QUOTE]

Yep, left from Seward early this week.

[QUOTE=Robert;102778]Yep, left from Seward early this week.[/QUOTE]

The DISCO was in Seward and was loaded out already, Kulluk went to DH but I believe still there

I’m sorry to rub salt into Shell’s wounds but how a massive company with such resources and with so much at stake could so completely prove themselves so unprepared for the 2012 season and have made so many mistakes boggles the mind!

I mean they are so obtuse that they even besmirch the name “Clown Circus”! Are they really that stoopid and daft on a corporate level?

btw…the gentleman in the very top left is the marine assets manager responsible for the KULLUK tow plan

Shell barred from returning to drill for oil in Arctic without overhaul
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/mar/15/shell-barred-drill-oil-arctic

[QUOTE=c.captain;102783]I’m sorry to rub salt into Shell’s wounds but how a massive company with such resources and with so much at stake could so completely prove themselves so unprepared for the 2012 season and have made so many mistakes boggles the mind!

I mean they are so obtuse that they even besmirch the name “Clown Circus”! Are they really that stoopid and daft on a corporate level?

btw…the gentleman in the very top left is the marine assets manager responsible for the KULLUK tow plan[/QUOTE]

Yeah, a bit amazing about how unprepared they seemed to be and how many errors were made! It is not like anyone can’t figure out how much attention something like this is gonna bring!

We had a term for this in the Navy, a “Mongolian Cluster-F*ck”

Of course, now it’s called “Business As Usual”

Shell should not be allowed back into the Arctic until it has a completely new and highly competent management team. Shell also needs a drilling contractor with new state of the art drill rigs and new state of the art containment vessels. Nothing but the very best. No more old junk. Or no more Shell.

[QUOTE=tugsailor;102815]Shell should not be allowed back into the Arctic until it has fired Peter Slaiby and Curtis Smith, and it has a completely new and highly competent management team. Shell also needs a new drilling contractor with new state of the art drill rigs and new state of the art containment vessels. No more clueless fools. No more old junk. Or no more Shell.[/QUOTE]

amen brother…A FUCKING MEN!

I wonder what will become of the Aiviq now that they aren’t needed in the Arctic. Anyone have any word on this?

It is paid for and under contract. Shell will probably keep it under contract or sub-lease it out. All custom building programs for CHOUEST are structured like this.

Either way, G-money has not lost a dime and has a step up on every other company looking to build for Alaska. CHOUEST is the only company that is in the same or better position than before this debacle.

Maybe Conoco Phillips will rent it from Shell for their Arctic adventure. Who knows whats going on now.

well, well…seems the DOI sees right through Shell afterall

Weaknesses in Shell’s management of contractors on whom they relied for many critical aspects of its program – including development of its containment system, emission controls to comply with air permits, and maritime operations – led to many of the problems that the company experienced, the report found.

“Shell simply did not maintain strong, direct oversight of some of its key contractors,” said Beaudreau. “Working in the Arctic requires thorough advance planning and preparation, rigorous management focus, a close watch over contractors, and reliance on experienced, specialized operators who are familiar with the uniquely challenging conditions of the Alaskan offshore. In some areas Shell performed well, but in other areas they did not, and Alaska’s harsh environment was unforgiving.”

ENOUGH OF THE NOBLE DRILLING, ECO & HGM BULLSHIT! Time to get contractors who have worked in Alaska for decades to run this show or it is going to be another clown circus all over again in 2014. Come on Foss/Saltchuk! Hello Crowley! Hey there Western, et all y’all! Time for a offshore maritime contractor based on the west coast with extensive local operating knowledge in ALASKA! NOW IS THE PERFECT CHANCE TO RECOVER THIS FUMBLED BALL AND RUN WITH IT! IF YOU DON’T, YOU ARE PATHETIC FOOLS WHO DON’T DESERVE THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BUSINESS THAT IS RIGHT AT YOUR DOORSTEP!

At the very least if Noble, ECO and HGM remain the principal contractors, they had better get some Alaska Arctic experienced players on their teams. Plenty of good men out there to recruit. DO YOU HEAR?!?

.