Foreign Marine Professional looking to obtain USCG License

It took me three cycles to nail the final license. I spent so much time at the REC Miami, I knew the names and family issues of the DHS security guards at the building! When I nailed the final exam, they all fist pumped me on my exit out of the building, hee hee.

Thanks for the input. I received a notification back saying that they were missing my proof of Country of Citizenship, which I didn’t think was needed (even after I asked the NMC online chat). So I’ve emailed that in and am hoping to hear back from them soon.
Think I’ll be aiming to spend a couple of days getting the exams knocked out and then see where I lie with the results. Would like to resit any of them that I don’t pass the first time pretty much straight away and then at least it’s all fresh in my noodle. Will have to see how it goes.
But you’re right, I’m aiming at being there first thing in the morning and working through until closing time, so will see how I get on.
Did make me laugh at the DHS security guards fist bumping you when you passed!

What books are available for use by someone sitting for QMED exams?

Do the QMED exams require looking things up in the CFRs? Or Chemical Data Guide? Or anything else?

What are good sources of practice questions?

What, if any, USCG approved STCW courses does a QMED need?

Would it be a practical job market advantage for a QMED to also get Tankerman Assistant, Lifeboatman, or any other additional endorsements?

Is there any oil patch specific, or safety training , such as BOISET, or HAZMAT, that a QMED might find advantageous?

Marinetextbooks has qmed books. Can’t go wrong with mariner advancement, hawsepipe.net or lapware either.

Yes to CFRs and chem data guide.

Assuming a qmed wants to sail beyond the boundary lines, they need ab seafarer engine, rfpew and basic training. I wanna say survival craft/lifeboatman is a requirement but I can’t remember.

Once in a while I have seen job postings looking for a qmed/tankerman. Having a tankerman these days is probably worth more $.

Having those gulf classes would be advantageous for getting on OSVs since a lot of those companies are cheap these days. Less new hire cost for them the better I would think.

1 Like

Hey tugsailor,

I have wondered the same thing about most of those questions you’ve posted. As Ctony has kindly added in, there’s a few websites that he’s listed where you can find further information but there’s also a website somewhere (apologies, I forget the site) but it lists all the recommended reading for the exams. Seemed a bit much to be honest, but then again it was from the NMC.

STCW courses, if it’s the same as it is for me, you’ll need Basic Sea Survival, Basic Fire Fighting, Basic First Aid and Personal and Social Safety and Responsibilities. For my current position, I’ve also had to do Advanced Fire Fighting, Certification of Proficiency in Survival Craft and Rescue Boats and Medical First Aid at Sea. Unfortunately none of mine are recognized by the USCG, so will have to start all over again with those at some point!

I do have a bunch of textbooks in PDF form for Engineering, but don’t know of a way to post them into the Forum. If someone can tell me how, then I’ll happily upload them, otherwise, I’d need an email address or dropbox access to put them into.

Crappy thing for the Tankerman endorsement (correct me if I’m wrong) is that you need to have a minimum amount of time on a tanker in order to be eligible.

Tankerman-Assistant and STCW Basic Tanker Operations require either time on tank vessels, or a course. One or the other, not both. So you can get it without tank vessel time. If you qualify with tank vessel time and no course, you also have to take an exam from the Coast Guard.

Tankerman-PIC and STCW Advanced require both, plus participation in cargo transfers.

jdcavo, thanks for the correction. That was me getting them mixed up. I don’t know if I’m correct on this one or not, but I believe that the USCG wouldn’t acknowledge a Hazardous Cargo Endorsement for the course for Tankerman-Assistant. Again, not sure, but I think I’m right on that one.

As a deckie, I’m not very knowledgeable about engine certification requirements, nor do I need to be.

I asked those questions mostly for your benefit.

If you are going to go the deckineer on a tug route, I think getting Tankerman Assistant might be a plus. If you end up being a deckineer on a tug towing an oil barge, you just need 90 days (60 - 12 hour days) and 10 transfers to upgrade to Tankerman.

Tankerman on a US tug/barge pays about $500 a day.

It has to be a ā€œTankship Familiarization: Dangerous Liquidsā€ or ā€œTankship Dangerous Liquidsā€ course specifically approved (by the USCG) for the tankerman endorsement. See 46 CFR 13.121(c ).

Ah right, sorry didn’t realize you were a Deckie! I’ll be working through some answers to the questions you posed and will see what I can come up with.

I think that with the CFRs, I would like to think that they would give you the material to look them up and not expect you to know them off the top of your head, because that’s pretty hectic. Either way, I’ll have a look through them and see what I can learn. Chem data sheets should be fairly easy for me to get my head around.

For the Assistant Tankerman, I didn’t add that in for the credentials I applied for, so that might be something to do for the future.

They provide the CFRs to look things up in the exam room. However, looking things up in the CFR requires practice and acquired skills. While the CFRs are in English, turgid CFR English is a foreign language to most of US

2 Likes

Cool. Will have to get some practice in learning how to look things up on them. It’s all the same with the rules and regs regardless of your flag state. It’s all Greek to me!

OK, so took all my exams yesterday and this morning and somehow managed to pass them all. So now I have a QMED Any Rating MMC on it’s way to me hopefully!
Just wanted to take a moment to thank everyone who gave their time, opinions, advice and experience and helped me get through this. Honestly I’d have been stuffed if it weren’t for you guys!
Will be looking to try and pick up some temporary work during my next leave with a view to build up my US flagged sea time for the future.
Cheers guys!

7 Likes

Good show!

2 Likes

@tugsailor Thanks! Will say that the examiner looked at me a little odd when I told him my intentions were to sit as many of the modules in the first day as possible to see where I needed to be the second day. At the end of the first day he chuckled when he ticked the box saying I’d met the minimum requirement of two modules in the one day, when I’d sat seven!
Just ticked myself off with failing the Fireman Watertender module because looking back, I know I rushed it and made stupid mistakes. Which meant I had to sit the two Junior Engineer modules when I would have otherwise not have had to. Oh well, I live and learn right?

Alright Chaps?

Have another quick question for those of you who seem to be able to navigate the USCG NMC a LOT better than I seem to be able.

So I know it’s a ways off yet, but I started looking into where I’d be able to go in terms of licensing and credentials and what not once I gain my Citizenship, with the end goal being me attaining my USCG STCW Chief Engineer Unlimited license.

From what I’m reading, once I gain my Citizenship, and if I have the right amount of sea service (i.e. if I’ve managed to get myself some time under the US flag OR the USCG will accept my foreign sea service) and I complete my US STCW trainings, I would be able to apply and test for Designated Duty Engineer. Then moving on from there, after 24 months sea service as DDE National, I’d be eligible to apply and test for USCG STCW Chief Engineer 3000KW/4000HP or more.

Have I got this at all right or am I well off on what I’m thinking? Can anyone shed some light on this for me because, like I said, it’s some way off yet, but I’d like to get my ducks in a row kind of thing and have the information in hand. More than likely I’m waaaay off the mark and I’ve got it all backwards again, but then I’m not going to bother asking NMC as they were not much use with helping me get my QMED.

Hoping that this might be able to help some others out as well who’re looking for the same information.

Cheers guys! And smooth sailing!

I don’t see any reason why you wouldn’t be able to go straight to Chief Engineer Unlimited, there’s definitely no reason to start all the way down at DDE.

All of your sea time is meticulously documented, correct?

I didn’t realize that would even be a possibility. So looking through the checklist, as long as I attained all the US based STCW certification required and took and passed the exams, there is the potential for me to go straight to the Chief Engineer Unlimited based off my current sea time?

All my sea time is fully documented and was accepted for my QMED application without individual Sea Service Letters, so I would think that it would all be accepted for applying to test for a Chief Engineer Unlimited, but still a few things to get done before I can start applying.

Thanks for the info, always appreciated.

How much time do you have as Second Engineer?

There is no requirement in the rules for the time as an officer to have been licensed by the USCG.

46 CFR §11.510

(a) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for endorsement as chief engineer of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels is—

(1) One year of service as first assistant engineer; or

(2) One year of service while holding a license or MMC endorsement as first assistant engineer. A minimum of 6 months of this service must have been as first assistant engineer, and the remainder must be as assistant engineer. Service as an assistant engineer other than first assistant engineer is accepted on a two-for-one basis to a maximum of 6 months (2 days of service as a second or third assistant engineer equals 1 day of creditable service).

I can see them scrutinizing sea time more when it’s used to go straight to Chief Unlimited than when it’s used for QMED but I don’t know if that will be the case.