Different West Coast Port Slowdown

Port slowdown of a different type. Interesting article from the Seattle Times:

Like many of his neighbors near the Seattle waterfront, Alex Smith keeps a close eye on the big container ships crossing Elliott Bay to and from the terminals at the Port of Seattle.

So when Smith, a retired marine components industry professional, noticed fewer vessels coming through starting in mid-April, he worried it was an “early warning system” for the effects of the widening U.S.-China trade dispute.

“It’s frightening, to tell you the truth,” Smith, 80, said of the possible economic costs as the two countries’ escalating tariffs have made trade much more expensive.

Fewer ships coming into the U.S. means companies can’t get components. Retailers and consumers can’t get products. Farmers and manufacturers lose foreign markets. “Everything stops,” Smith said.

Smith is hardly alone in worrying about the economy in and around trade-reliant Puget Sound ever since new tariffs rolled out by President Donald Trump quickly escalated into a full-blown trade war.

Experts think it won’t be until May that the full impacts of a U.S.-China tariff tit-for-tat hit the ports of Seattle and Tacoma, given the weekslong transit times between the sparring nations.

But port officials and port-dependent businesses are already feeling the early effects.

They’re also bracing for what could be a substantial decline not only in import and export activity, but also in work for related players. That includes longshoremen who handle the cargo and truckers who haul goods into and out of the ports.

“One of my fears is that the local trucking community is going to be the first to be impacted by these changes” in cargo volumes, said Jeff Bellerud, chief operating officer at the Northwest Seaport Alliance, which oversees marine cargo operations at both ports.

For months now, fears of a slowdown have been masked by a surge in so-called forward buying.

Starting last summer, many U.S. companies began importing extra inventory or shipping extra products overseas out of concern that then-candidate Trump would win reelection and make good on his campaign promises of high tariffs.

That forward buying continued in the first three months of this year. In January, February and March, the ports of Tacoma and Seattle handled nearly 666,000 inbound and outbound containers, a 24% jump from the same period in 2024, port data shows.

While it’s unclear how much of that extra volume was tied to forward buying, “a significant portion of that is likely due to folks advancing orders with concerns about potential tariffs,” said Steve Balaski, director of business development at the Northwest Seaport Alliance.

Now, however, the period of forward buying appears to be giving way to a period of slow or even no buying, especially since Trump raised tariffs on some Chinese goods to 145% earlier this month, even as he has cut tariffs on many other countries.

Tariffs are essentially a tax on imported goods that is paid by importers, which often pass along some or all of that cost to consumers.

Port officials said they were still analyzing vessel data and couldn’t yet say whether April had seen a marked decrease in vessel traffic.

Others are seeing a decline.

Data from the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound, an industry association, shows the number of arriving container ships berthing at Seattle and Tacoma terminals from April 1 to April 24 was down 12% compared with the same period in 2024. Arrivals of ships carrying automobiles in April was down 36%.

Similarly, the number of container vessels arriving or departing from Seattle and Tacoma between April 1 and April 15 was down around 27% compared with the first half of March and by around 24% from April 1-15, 2024, according to a Seattle-area marine services industry insider, who asked to remain anonymous because they weren’t authorized to speak for the company.

And Smith, the amateur ship-spotter, says the drop is pretty clear to anyone actually looking at Elliott Bay.

Give me a break,” he said, laughing. “There’s no container ships. … What more do you need?”

Whatever the decline turns out to be, it isn’t necessarily all tariff-related.

Other factors that could reduce container traffic in Puget Sound include congestion-related delays at the port of Vancouver, B.C., where many vessels stop before or after coming to Seattle and Tacoma, port officials says.

Longer term, the rise of larger container vessels is also lowering the number of sailings, as is the industry’s “alliance” strategy, where rivals share vessels to avoid half-full ships.

But April’s apparent lull on Puget Sound could foreshadow even steeper falls in traffic as the trade war continues.

Already, many scheduled sailings by container vessels bound from other nations to U.S. ports, including Seattle and Tacoma, have been canceled or postponed. Often, U.S. importers are deciding they can’t afford to pay the tariffs.

Media accounts have reported a 30% decline in scheduled sailings out of China for the U.S., which the alliance’s Balaski says is “a fair estimate for what we’re going to see” in terms of impacts on alliance operations, which count on China for around 40% of imported volume.

That jibes with data from SONAR, a freight market data platform: from March 30 to April 21, ocean bookings for containers from international ports to Seattle or Tacoma fell around 29%.

Bookings into the two ports “took a big step down the week of March 30, and then it took another big step down, beginning April 20 and continuing to the present day,” said JP Hampstead, a strategic analyst at Firecrown Media, which owns the trade publication FreightWaves.

Because cargo vessels take several weeks to reach Seattle from Asia, the major effects of that missing cargo won’t materialize until mid-May, when the port expects volume to go “soft.”

But some early ripples have already arrived.

SwaddleDesigns, a Seattle-based baby clothes company that relies heavily on imports from China, paused a container shipment due this month after realizing the 145% tariff would add roughly $300,000 to the shipment’s original $200,000 cost, said Jeff Damir, chief operating officer.

“As a small business, we just don’t have that money sitting around,” Damir said.

Exporters are also feeling the chill of tariffs.

Seattle-Tacoma is one of the largest gateways for exports of hay and the largest for apples and frozen french fries. All are vulnerable to China’s retaliatory tariffs, which have made Chinese buyers less interested in U.S. goods.

“We’ve had exporters actually coming to our terminals to pick up containers of product that they’d already delivered to be exported to China and they’re not going to ship them” due to the Chinese tariffs, Balaski said. ”They’re just picking them up and taking them back and trying to find another home for them.”

Adding to the pain is the uncertainty over how long the tariffs could last.

Trump has a pattern of suspending or lowering tariffs, and media reports indicated he is also considering lowering tariffs on China.

Smith, for one, isn’t holding his breath. After years in manufacturing, he knows how global supply chains work and how hard they are to restart.

Even if the White House rolled back the tariffs tomorrow, it would take weeks or months before flow of goods returns to normal, he said.

“This pipeline has been shut off and it’s not like you can turn it back on and it starts up again in a day,” Smith said. “The pipeline is empty.”

1 Like

A thing to be aware of is that consumer goods typically sell for 5 to 7 times the cost of manufacturing.

Example: if a store orders baby clothes from an Asian manufacturer that cost $100 to make, they sell them for $500 to $700. That’s why they can still make good money during a 50% off sale. Most of the markup is at the retail level.

Shipping typically only costs around 7%.

If something costs $100 in China, a 145% tariff would add $145 to the cost. Total cost $245, plus shipping, insurance, customs broker charges, local trucking, etc.

They could still sell it for the original markup to $500 to $700 and make a profit. They just couldn’t sell it on sale for 50% off and make a profit.

If they added to full cost of the tariff as a “tariff surcharge”. An item that originally cost $500, would become $645. That would be a significant increase, but not unaffordable.

If I want to buy a new $500 suit, an increase to $645 is not going to stop me.

On the other hand, some people might check Good Will first.

Trump has tipped over the apple cart with these ham-handed tariffs and made a hell of a mess.

There are a lot of bruised apples, but we’ll just have to make apple sauce until things get sorted out over time and most of the tariffs are rescinded.

However, America has permanently lost its place as leader of the free world. It will be 50 years or more before America is trusted again, if ever.

1 Like

Don’t I wish it were that low. A few weeks ago I shipped a small (15 pound) package of parts to Spain. It cost $600 to ship parts costing only about $3K. A couple of weeks earlier we shipped the parts for a pair of exhaust treatment systems to the same yard and customer paid $40K for shipping. That was around 15 percent of the value. Shipping costs have become a major issue for our overseas customers, and for us when sourcing parts that are unobtanium in the USA. The threat of moronic tariffs have lead us to forward purchase far beyond our normal planning and pay exorbitant shipping at the same time. This is going to kill more small businesses than Trump measles will kill American children.

1 Like

I should have said that shipping hundreds of full containers of consumer goods costs big shippers like Walmart, Amazon or GM about 7%.

Little guys like us shipping a few parts have to pay high retail.

1 Like

We “little guys” represent close to 50 percent of the US GDP and employ around 45 percent of American workers. Unfortunately that is not enough to buy the few politicians remaining who are not already on big business’ payrolls.

1 Like