[QUOTE=alcor;37302]I have busted a gut trying to implicate all involved. All I get back is that I’m some sort of BP spy. I’ve always been prepared to offer sensible arguement and discussion to find the correct outcome of events and who are responsible. When I receive comments of a disparaging nature then I’ll respond. I have made much effort to be the impartial voice on this thread only to be accused of being a spy for BP. Why? Because, I’m not prepared to jump on the ‘noose’ bandwagon…yet. I want all failures to be highlighted, not just the ones that are conveniently parked on BP’s door. I have said all along that BP will be accountable for their failures. But, so will the others. I am 100% neutral in this.
I’ve even said things I regret about Americans, because I will stand my ground when insulted.
You know me from day one, I’ve always looked at the reasons for failure from across the board. Is that such a bad thing?[/QUOTE]
Reread post #3131 & tell me it couldn’t have happened that way. The fact is it could have happened exactly that way. It could have happened to you, me, or anyone else exactly that way. If those tests were good & we don’t have any proof they weren’t, except for BP’s spokesmen & they won’t turn over evidence they have that would back it up, then that is the way it did happen as far as I’m concerned. I will wait on ALf, Frarig, Or Pumping Jack or someone else who has actually been on a rig floor & knows exactly what I’m talkin about to correct the flaws in my thinking.