[QUOTE=company man 1;37300]It’s ok. If a dumb country boy from Sout Louisiana can figure it out, Don’t you think others can too. You’re too late I already assigned blame to TO for allowing themselves to follow along. I also blamed them for prematurely getting rid of the mud & loosing volume control, if they actually did loose volume control. I kept wondering why they waited until 2000 hours to displace. That was the compromise. We will displace ahead but we need to pump the mud off first. They most likely waited until they had the mud removed & at least one tank cleaned before they displaced. They could have shut the pumps down & still had gains in the pits. You say I’m a sensationalist, but you can’t prove me wrong in any way can you? In fact looking at the pictures & seeing fire coming out of the gas buster line & the boom, I have very good ground to stand behind my point. Everyone knows you open to the gasbuster to bleed off pressure. That is everyone but you.[/QUOTE]
I have busted a gut trying to implicate all involved. All I get back is that I’m some sort of BP spy. I’ve always been prepared to offer sensible arguement and discussion to find the correct outcome of events and who are responsible. When I receive comments of a disparaging nature then I’ll respond. I have made much effort to be the impartial voice on this thread only to be accused of being a spy for BP. Why? Because, I’m not prepared to jump on the ‘noose’ bandwagon…yet. I want all failures to be highlighted, not just the ones that are conveniently parked on BP’s door. I have said all along that BP will be accountable for their failures. But, so will the others. I am 100% neutral in this.
I’ve even said things I regret about Americans, because I will stand my ground when insulted.
You know me from day one, I’ve always looked at the reasons for failure from across the board. Is that such a bad thing?