Chouest in Valdez?

[QUOTE=anchorman;181454]What is the background of this particular Captain or what is the assumed background?[/QUOTE]

The particular captain B. Newill a long time Chouest captain of anchor boats was the third mate/towing expert.that videoed himself banjoing the tow and making light of the situation he should have never let himself be in. If he had Alaskan or similar experience before being chosen that fact was not mentioned in the hearing. He did “not hear” an overload alarm 38 times. His name is a matter of public record and the USCG report recommended disciplinary proceedings against him for his incompetence. Why he was chosen? He was the best they had I guess.

The Coast Guard report describes the harrowing series of events that followed. At daybreak on Dec. 27, still two weeks out of Seattle, the Edison Chouest employee managing the towline on the Aiviq side, Third Mate Bobby Newill, shot a cellphone video for his wife as he gradually let out a hundred yards more line, trying to find a sweet spot. The ship’s tow system was built by Rolls-Royce: a winch on the back deck and computerized controls up in the wheelhouse. Newill’s video shows the view through the wheelhouse window as the stern of the Aiviq bobs in the Gulf of Alaska, the Kulluk in the distance, then it pans to a computer monitor that displays towline tension. From 35 tons, the tension shoots rapidly into the triple digits — “Here we go,” Newill says — and peaks at 228 tons. “That is a good quality piece of wire,” he says as the numbers drop again.
Between 5:34 a.m. and 11:29 a.m., according to a later computer analysis by Rolls-Royce, the Aiviq’s “wire tensile strength overload” alarm went off 38 times. It was set to trigger at 300 tons. The alarm, a piercing ring, would not stop until Newill acknowledged it on the computer screen. New to Alaska and new to a ship that was new to the world, Newill later claimed that the alarm never went off. Coast Guard investigators concluded that he mistook the tension alarm for another alarm that was known to be acting up.
At 11:35 a.m. the towline snapped. Video shot from the Aiviq’s closed-circuit cameras shows the moment. It is unremarkable: The taut line stretches into the sea. The tail of the tug rises once again, and the line suddenly whips back and goes limp. The Aiviq keeps bobbing.

Chouest seems to have trouble finding people to operate outside the GOM. I guess the Master and the C.E. were the best they could find for the Gould down in Antarctica also.

[B]$2.1 million penalties in Gould pollution case[/B]

A Louisiana ship-operating company was sentenced in U.S. District Court in New Orleans on charges related to the illegal discharge of oil into the oceans, the Justice Department announced Thursday.
Galliano, La., headquartered Offshore Vessels LLC (OSV), formerly Edison Chouest Offshore Vessels LLC, was sentenced to pay a criminal fine of $1,750,000 and remit a payment of $350,000 as community service to the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation. The community service funds are to be used to study polar water pollution and protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems in the Antarctic region. OSV also will serve a period of probation for three years, during which it will be required to operate under an Environmental Compliance Plan.
OSV pleaded guilty on July 22, 2010, to knowingly discharging waste oil from one of its vessels, in violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS).
“The criminal fine in this case will serve as a strong deterrent to all vessel companies, American and foreign, against deliberately violating the laws enacted to protect oceans,” said Ignacia S. Moreno, Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice. "The required payment will provide a means of studying polar water oil pollution and its impact on Antarctica�s fragile marine ecosystem."
OSV owned and operated the R/V Laurence M. Gould (R/V Gould). The R/V Gould was a 2,966 gross ton American-flagged vessel that served as an ice-breaking research vessel for the National Science Foundation on research voyages to and from Antarctica. In its guilty plea earlier this year, OSV admitted that crew members knowingly discharged oily wastewater from the bilge tank of the R/V Gould overboard to the high seas, in violation of APPS. In doing so, they bypassed the ship�s oily-water separator, a pollution-control device. Regulations promulgated under APPS require that oily wastewater be discharged only after it has been sent through an oily water separator.
The case was investigated by the U.S. Coast Guard Criminal Investigative Service. The case is being prosecuted by Senior Trial Attorney Daniel Dooher of the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice and Assistant U.S. Attorney Dorothy Manning Taylor.

[QUOTE=anchorman;181454]What is the background of this particular Captain or what is the assumed background?[/QUOTE]

In my view the captain’s background is irrelevant. For example the captain emailed ECO and told them that the Aiviq had problems with the design of the vents. No action was taken. If he was ECO’s best captain that just makes ECO look even worse.

[QUOTE=tengineer1;181457]The particular captain B. Newill a long time Chouest captain of anchor boats was the third mate/towing expert.that videoed himself banjoing the tow and making light of the situation he should have never let himself be in. If he had Alaskan or similar experience before being chosen that fact was not mentioned in the hearing. He did “not hear” an overload alarm 38 times. His name is a matter of public record and the USCG report recommended disciplinary proceedings against him for his incompetence. Why he was chosen? He was the best they had I guess.

The Coast Guard report describes the harrowing series of events that followed. At daybreak on Dec. 27, still two weeks out of Seattle, the Edison Chouest employee managing the towline on the Aiviq side, Third Mate Bobby Newill, shot a cellphone video for his wife as he gradually let out a hundred yards more line, trying to find a sweet spot. The ship’s tow system was built by Rolls-Royce: a winch on the back deck and computerized controls up in the wheelhouse. Newill’s video shows the view through the wheelhouse window as the stern of the Aiviq bobs in the Gulf of Alaska, the Kulluk in the distance, then it pans to a computer monitor that displays towline tension. From 35 tons, the tension shoots rapidly into the triple digits — “Here we go,” Newill says — and peaks at 228 tons. “That is a good quality piece of wire,” he says as the numbers drop again.
Between 5:34 a.m. and 11:29 a.m., according to a later computer analysis by Rolls-Royce, the Aiviq’s “wire tensile strength overload” alarm went off 38 times. It was set to trigger at 300 tons. The alarm, a piercing ring, would not stop until Newill acknowledged it on the computer screen. New to Alaska and new to a ship that was new to the world, Newill later claimed that the alarm never went off. Coast Guard investigators concluded that he mistook the tension alarm for another alarm that was known to be acting up.
At 11:35 a.m. the towline snapped. Video shot from the Aiviq’s closed-circuit cameras shows the moment. It is unremarkable: The taut line stretches into the sea. The tail of the tug rises once again, and the line suddenly whips back and goes limp. The Aiviq keeps bobbing.

Chouest seems to have trouble finding people to operate outside the GOM. I guess the Master and the C.E. were the best they could find for the Gould down in Antarctica also.

[B]$2.1 million penalties in Gould pollution case[/B]

A Louisiana ship-operating company was sentenced in U.S. District Court in New Orleans on charges related to the illegal discharge of oil into the oceans, the Justice Department announced Thursday.
Galliano, La., headquartered Offshore Vessels LLC (OSV), formerly Edison Chouest Offshore Vessels LLC, was sentenced to pay a criminal fine of $1,750,000 and remit a payment of $350,000 as community service to the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation. The community service funds are to be used to study polar water pollution and protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems in the Antarctic region. OSV also will serve a period of probation for three years, during which it will be required to operate under an Environmental Compliance Plan.
OSV pleaded guilty on July 22, 2010, to knowingly discharging waste oil from one of its vessels, in violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS).
“The criminal fine in this case will serve as a strong deterrent to all vessel companies, American and foreign, against deliberately violating the laws enacted to protect oceans,” said Ignacia S. Moreno, Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice. "The required payment will provide a means of studying polar water oil pollution and its impact on Antarctica�s fragile marine ecosystem."
OSV owned and operated the R/V Laurence M. Gould (R/V Gould). The R/V Gould was a 2,966 gross ton American-flagged vessel that served as an ice-breaking research vessel for the National Science Foundation on research voyages to and from Antarctica. In its guilty plea earlier this year, OSV admitted that crew members knowingly discharged oily wastewater from the bilge tank of the R/V Gould overboard to the high seas, in violation of APPS. In doing so, they bypassed the ship�s oily-water separator, a pollution-control device. Regulations promulgated under APPS require that oily wastewater be discharged only after it has been sent through an oily water separator.
The case was investigated by the U.S. Coast Guard Criminal Investigative Service. The case is being prosecuted by Senior Trial Attorney Daniel Dooher of the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice and Assistant U.S. Attorney Dorothy Manning Taylor.

[/QUOTE]

Well, I suppose I am glad I was not there as the Aiviq was my assignment if I had stayed with ECO.

[QUOTE=anchorman;181454]What is the background of this particular Captain or what is the assumed background?[/QUOTE]

Unless Chouest hires the captains currently working for Crowley then they’ll probably have next to no experience.

[QUOTE=anchorman;181460]Well, I suppose I am glad I was not there as the Aiviq was my assignment if I had stayed with ECO.[/QUOTE]

I suppose there are those that wish you’d have been there.

[QUOTE=Kennebec Captain;181458]In my view the captain’s background is irrelevant. For example the captain emailed ECO and told them that the Aiviq had problems with the design of the vents. No action was taken. If he was ECO’s best captain that just makes ECO look even worse.[/QUOTE]

Which captain? The towing captain? God the entire coon ass navy terminology is frustrating. If the Master of the Aviq knew he had problems with the fuel vents and communicated this to ECO, which is surely the case, did he think this would absolve him of responsibility of anything happening due to crap design or did he get a letter of absolution from ECO if there were any operational problems? My guess is he rolled the dice. Wanted to keep the pay check coming in and hoped for the best. Sadly sometimes the best doesn’t always happen. If ECO went to bat for him after the fact then good for him. At least no life was lost…that time.

[QUOTE=tengineer1;181464]Which captain? The towing captain? God the entire coon ass navy terminology is frustrating. If the Master of the Aviq knew he had problems with the fuel vents and communicated this to ECO, which is surely the case, did he think this would absolve him of responsibility of anything happening due to crap design or did he get a letter of absolution from ECO if there were any operational problems? My guess is he rolled the dice. Wanted to keep the pay check coming in and hoped for the best. Sadly sometimes the best doesn’t always happen. If ECO went to bat for him after the fact then good for him. At least no life was lost…that time.[/QUOTE]

I had forgotten about the multiple captains. I was referring to the master. With regards to the emails, it was in at least one of the official incident report.

As far as what the master thought about the emails I didn’t see anything about that one way or the other.

yes, unless they figure experience guys used to working equal time want to work 2/1; don’t think they will.

I know Crowley is a joke to work(GOM, liner service) for but I’ve always thought that particular operation did things a little differently up there, perhaps a little more common sense??? I may be wrong though.

[QUOTE=tengineer1;181462]I suppose there are those that wish you’d have been there.[/QUOTE]

I have been in 35-45 foot seas in the North Atlantic in the early 90’s running a deck barge - loaded with 7-9 ton boulders from Straight of Canso to Bermuda as part of a project for the Naval Air Station Annex restoration prior to the 1995 pullout; I had no desire to be in Alaska weather and towing. Using lifejackets to pry yourself to sleep, getting some shuteye, but never truly rested, beating ice off with bats, etc… been there done that to the extent I am willing to ever go. The only good part about that experience was the Captain at the time - disregarded the port authorities and brought the Secunda barge into Halifax with a 25 degree list - after we lost it twice in the WNA (The Canadian Navy was afraid the barge would sink and damage hydrophone assets for the sub base, and the boat was arrested as soon as we tied up). Lucky for me, I spent the next several weeks getting to know Nursing students at the local university in Halifax.

oh the sweet taste… Especially the purebred redheads

IBU and MMP pull support from Congressman Don Young and back his Democratic challenger.

Two maritime unions pull longtime support for Young, endorse challenger

Author: Alex DeMarban Updated: 2 days ago Published 2 days ago 

Don Young, left, and Steve Lindbeck (Photos by Marc Lester and Erik Hill / Alaska Dispatch News)

The two maritime unions that criticized Rep. Don Young over his silence on campaign contributor Edison Chouest Offshore’s likely assumption of tanker escort duties in Prince William Sound rescinded their longtime support for him and on Thursday announced they were endorsing his main challenger in the race.

Representatives with the Seattle-based Inlandboatmen’s Union and the Maryland-based International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots on announced their support for Democrat Steve Lindbeck at a press event at his campaign headquarters on Thursday.

The unions each have about 5,000 members living around the country. For decades, the groups have found an ally in Young, a former tugboat operator on the Yukon River. But they say they’ve been angered by his decision not to speak out over the awarding of a valuable private contract to Louisiana tugboat company Edison Chouest for spill-prevention and ship-escort duties in Prince William Sound. Edison Chouest was one of the companies faulted by the federal government for errors that led to the grounding of Shell’s Kulluk drilling rig off Kodiak in 2012.

[Rep. Young’s challenger says his receipt of contributions by a maritime company amounts to ‘legalized bribery’]

Edison Chouest employees and related companies have given close to $300,000 to Young’s campaigns and legal defense funds since 2007. Union members and Lindbeck have asserted the donations bought Young’s silence on a public matter involving a critical waterway that supports fishing.

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., manager of the spill-response contract on behalf of its owners — primarily BP, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips — says Edison Chouest is poised to take over the 10-year contract from Crowley Marine, a union company from Florida.

Young’s press secretary has said it’s not appropriate to weigh in on a private contractual matter.

But Edison Chouest has described several agencies and public entities as “stakeholders” in the contract, including the U.S. Coast Guard, the state Department of Environmental Conservation and a citizen watchdog group and fishermen.

Throwing out Crowley and giving the Valdez tanker escort contract to Chouest is the worst maritime decision ever made. Alaska regulators must step in and block this stupid deal.

I cannot believe that the Prince William Sound Advisory Council, and the State of Alaska, are going to let Aleyeska take the tanker escort contract away from a proven operator and give it to Chouest — which has already proven it’s incompetence in Alaska.

[QUOTE=tugsailor;186552]I cannot believe that the Prince William Sound Advisory Council, and the State of Alaska, are going to let Aleyeska take the tanker escort contract away from a proven operator and give it to Chouest — which has already proven it’s incompetence in Alaska.[/QUOTE]

Do a political campaign contribution search for Chouest and Alaska senators, congressmen etc. It will not show the the secret PAC money but it’ll show you a lot and you’ll understand why this is happening. Competence has nothing to do with it.
I’ll say one thing. The Chouest group gets a big return on the dollar for the bribes [campaign contributions] they pay.

[QUOTE=tengineer1;186553]Do a political campaign contribution search for Chouest and Alaska senators, congressmen etc. It will not show the the secret PAC money but it’ll show you a lot and you’ll understand why this is happening. Competence has nothing to do with it.
I’ll say one thing. The Chouest group gets a big return on the dollar for the bribes [campaign contributions] they pay.[/QUOTE]

Chouest gave $300,000 to Don Young alone. Don is a real jerk and people are tired of him. He’s going to lose this time.

The Alaska Legislature is too small with only 23 Senators and 44 House members. A company probably only has to buy 10 of them to get what it wants.

The Exxon Valdez oil spill still hits a raw nerve in Alaska, and especially in Prince William Sound. I cannot believe that people are going sit still for giving the contract to Chouest — when Chouest’s only proven ability in Alaska was putting Kulluk on the rocks. Who was it that almost saved Chouest and Kulluk? Oh, that was Crowley, with one of their proven PWS tanker escort tugs. Unbelievable.

[QUOTE=tugsailor;186554] Unbelievable.[/QUOTE]

It’s Alaska, it’s political bribery … believe it.

I am surprised (rhetorically) that the Alaska legislature has not been charged under the RICO statutes.

one of your colleagues with Pnw experience has said its not a tough job, but I agree it should be done by those with local experience. I don’t think chouest respects the elements and harshness of the environment even despite their kulluk incident

I wonder how lucrative it really is with the pipeline slowing down more and more?

[QUOTE=z-drive;186568]one of your colleagues with Pnw experience has said its not a tough job, but I agree it should be done by those with local experience. I don’t think chouest respects the elements and harshness of the environment even despite their kulluk incident

I wonder how lucrative it really is with the pipeline slowing down more and more?[/QUOTE]

The PWS tanker escort gig is mostly a boring job that does not require exceptional ability, except when it does — like trying to rescuing Chouest and KULLUK, or a disabled tanker in a Gulf of Alaska during a storm.

You hit the nail on the head when you mentioned vastly reduced pipeline volume. Crowley has excessive layers of inefficient management. They are super inefficient, no doubt super expensive, and they have been milking this cash cow for 25 years. When the pipeline was full and carrying 25 percent of US oil production it did not matter what Crowley cost. Now that there is just a trickle of oil coming out of the pipeline, and a lot fewer tanker trips, the cost per barrel for Crowley is several times higher.

Aleyeska wants to save money. They can no longer shrug off paying absurd money for Crowley. I understand that. If they want to hire another qualified vender, that’s fine. But not Chouest.

Chouest killed Arctic Alaska offshore drilling by putting KULLUK on the rocks. Chouest has done tremendous long term economic harm to Alaska. Who has a worse track record in Alaska? Nobody.

Back it up just a minute here, hoss …

Let’s go back and ask the question, “WHY” was this rig move even happening in the first place …

because the captain of the tug agreed to go when he shouldn’t have (chouest) and to follow a bad route. Plus a vessel not up to the task. Had chouest hired Mariners with local knowledge and not said yes to every demand of their customer they maybe in a different situation. Maybe shell deserves a good portion of the blame too—one word: buckles!

But isn’t the customer always right? D’oh!!!