I dont get why certain parts of the industry are trying to make it a tool that is clearly isnt - hence what the IMO say in that document
Why has the opinion changed ( for some) from when it was first released and yet the capability of it hasnt changed?
The MAIB has an AIS assisted accident listed quite a few years ago, that was used by my instructors when I did my naras/arpa a few years ago.
It was a ground track versus water track issue and 2 muppets on watch.