I’m ok with larger foreign built wind vessels coming in for the first 10 years, provided they are immediately reflagged US.
From a feasibility standpoint now seems like the time. With major players already invested in leases in the hundreds of millions and partnerships in the billions, something like a US manning mandate wouldn’t be seen as barrier to development since they are already committed to developing.
On the other hand, as the article points out, “If Shell phones the White House, someone is going to take the call.” So the opposition lobby doesn’t have to take it sitting down.
That being said, I’m all for pushing. But where do think the focus would need to be, ie: who has the enforcement prerogative. Is this an issue of CPB issuing another policy interpretation, or MARAD (with an acting Admin), Dept of Trans in general, or more letters to our individual Reps and Senators?
Rep Garamendi’s legislation was a good start, though interesting that he’s is from CA. I’d hope to see something from Sen. Whitehouse (RI) and other East Coast wind coalition states as this is certainly in their constituents interests. I know you have no love for the bayou boat operators @c.captain , but I’d think in this case Chouest, having already gotten involved, and having obviously having the political clout with southern politicians, would be an asset in this fight as well, no?