Hurtigruten's MS Maud Damaged by Rogue Wave in North Sea Storm -- Under Tow

Windows in the wheelhouse busted out, lost steering, ship had to be taken under tow.

I don’t like the term "rogue wave’ as it’s used here. If you’re in shit weather there’s going to be an occasional big one, or a big set.

1 Like

I remember years ago when we came through Unimak Pass and ran into a storm. The wave that blew out the window in my office wasn’t the first of the set. It did however set us up for the one that did.

2 Likes

Yeah, hard to tell from the video, the boarding wave does look bigger.

Wave period was also a factor. The distance from crest to crest gave sufficient time for the bow to drop into that deep trough.

2 Likes

…but not enough time to let the bow come up to a usefull draft.

1 Like

Not just a few broken bridge windows: “MS Maud” will resume service in mid-April.

1 Like

2 Likes

Wow it seemed like the bridge got wiped out.

DP3 offshore vessels have to have another Back-up DP console away from the main Bridge, this incident shows that it might be good to have something similar for cruise ships.

Have a back-up steering console somewhere away from the main Bridge so if it gets wiped out the ship can still be properly controlled. I know there is always emergency steering but having a proper back-up steering console is better.

several super yachts i inspected 350+ ft had a steering binnacle and controls in the lazarette
and an auxiliary genset in the stack fiddley which is SOP on most cruise ships in my day

My understanding is that they took the opportunity to update the bridge. That’s not damage from the incident.

Seawater is a horror for electrical connections not specially prepared for outside use on deck.
Salt is hygroscopic and cannot be removed, only diluted in large quantities of fresh water.
They probably had to change all electric wires.

1 Like

Wheelhouse is in a good spot to catch a boarding sea.

1 Like

I thought the same thing when I saw a photo of the ship’s exterior. The entire design appears to be better suited for river cruising rather than the North Sea.

1 Like

She is a small ship, 136 x 22 meters, and the inversed bridge windows are indeed very low.
It seems, she was built as a passenger and car ferry along the Norwegian coast, where the open ocean stretches are short.

Now, as an ‘expedition ship’, she can go anywhere where the ‘real cruise-ships’ cannot enter. However, between these ‘anywheres’, she has long routes on the open oceans in often not very friendly regions.

1 Like

She was built in 2003 as MS Midnatsol for the Coastal Express Service along the Norwegian coast, carrying pax, cargo of all kinds and a few cars (45 PCE):
https://skipshistorie.net/Tromso/TRS101TromsFylkesDS/Tekster/TRS10120030100000%20MIDNATSOL.htm
Not a traditional RoPax ferry (No bow/stern ramps) Deck plan:

Refurbished for expedition cruises and renamed Maud in 2021.

1 Like

A lot of rubbish speculation on here. I was on the ship. Hurtigruten were very naughty and quickly put out a presser making it out to be just a rogue wave and no one hurt. It was a forecasted ‘Violent Storm 11’. They took us to sea instead of keeping us safe in port,to meet the Christmas cruisers waiting to board in the UK. It was 24 hours of hell. The storm was just all ‘rogue waves’. Mountaineous. Pitch black. It was a Mayday. The bridge was 1ft deep in water and water seeped into cabins on my deck. All power and electrics wiped out. It took 18 hours for a tug to get a rope on us. The 3 months in dry dock was needed to repair all the damage from all the water. And the inside of the ship was smashed as if there’s been an earthquake. People were hurt. There were broken bones, shredded hands and black eyes from flying furniture and glass. Hurtigruten have treated the passengers dreadfully and not told the truth publicly about what happened. You should never speculate on someone else’s trauma.

3 Likes

Here’s a FB post about the incident, some of the people leaving comments were aboard on that voyage. None of them match what you’ve posted.

2 Likes

You may want to re-read those comments, Mr. Bugge. While many are very complimentary to the ship & crew, they’re not addressing the voyage in question. All who DID address that voyage spoke of a “very significant experience”, including a grand piano falling in the lounge and requiring years to recover from the experience. I didn’t scroll through every message, but all who were on that voyage seemed to have been powerfully affected by it.

Is this in reply to my post #14, giving the specs and history of the vessel?
I have not posted on anything else, incl. on the comments from those who were onboard at the time, or before and after.

Or are you referring to my liking post #16?
Yes I did notice that many of the comments were from people not onboard at the time.

You are absolutely correct, sir - I should have addressed my comment toward KC - I don’t know how I managed to mis-read the author of post #15

Hartley

The two news articles I read reported only minor injures to passengers or crew. Any links to reports that match @MaudPassenger’s post which says broken bones and shredded hands?