Deepwater Horizon - Transocean Oil Rig Fire

[B]

Judge blocks Gulf offshore drilling moratorium [/B]

By MICHAEL KUNZELMAN (AP) – 1 hour ago

NEW ORLEANS — A federal judge on Tuesday blocked a six-month moratorium on new deepwater drilling projects imposed after the massive Gulf oil spill.
The White House promised an immediate appeal. President Barack Obama’s administration had halted approval of any new permits for deepwater drilling and suspended drilling of 33 exploratory wells in the Gulf.
Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Obama believes strongly that drilling at such depths does not make any sense and puts the safety of workers “at a danger that the president does not believe we can afford.”

Several companies that ferry people and supplies and provide other services to offshore drilling rigs asked U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman in New Orleans to overturn the moratorium, arguing it was arbitrarily imposed.

Feldman agreed, saying in his ruling the Interior Department assumed that because one rig failed, all companies and rigs doing deepwater drilling pose an imminent danger.
“The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is an unprecedented, sad, ugly and inhuman disaster,” he wrote. “What seems clear is that the federal government has been pressed by what happened on the Deepwater Horizon into an otherwise sweeping confirmation that all Gulf deepwater drilling activities put us all in a universal threat of irreparable harm.”

The moratorium was imposed after the April 20 explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig that killed 11 workers and blew out the well 5,000 feet underwater that has spewed millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf.

The Interior Department said it needed time to study the risks of deepwater drilling. But the lawsuit filed by Hornbeck Offshore Services of Covington, La., claimed there was no proof the other operations posed a threat.

Company CEO Todd Hornbeck said after the ruling that he is looking forward to getting back to work.

“It’s the right thing for not only the industry but the country,” he said.

More at http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gIXWYBTpLtSayJtg41LKXpxSxVPAD9GGG1S80

Unless the US Federal Government comes forward with very clear terms on exactly what must be done to restart and continue drilling this means nothing and the GOM will stay closed. If they do not do that soon the rigs will be gone and the industry will never return.

[QUOTE=OldHondoHand;37482]Here’s a comment from this thread on Day 2 :

· kwCharlie

Re: Transocean Deepwater Horizon is on fire

How did it happen? We do not know for certain, but according to our sources, the rig had recently set and cemented a tapered 7"x 9 5/8" tapered casing and were somewhere in the process of displacing the riser with seawater and subsequently setting a surface plug when the well blew out. According to one anecdote, the rig was probably less than 24 hours from leaving location when the blowout occurred.

• What caused it? From this analyst’s experience in the cementing industry, the incident appears as if it was either the product of annular gas migration through the cement sheath as it was setting or that the act of displacing the riser to seawater reduced the hydrostatic head enough that it caused the well to start flowing though cement that was not yet hard. With casing in the ground, these two possible explanations seem by far the most likely, although its impossible at this point not to rule out some other cause or contributing factor such as a blow out preventer or a casing integrity issue.
It unloaded, just like the 6000 pound overpressure at haley quinn allison back in 1981. Nothing could stop it.
I think they encountered pressures that even BOP could not handle. Rated 15,000 PSI. Unusual to get near a pound a foot, but not impossible. Saw those type pressures in Loving County back in 1981.

Here it is, in a nutshell, what the Congressional hearings are saying:

“…congressional investigators have identified several mistakes by BP in the weeks leading up to the disaster as it fell way behind on drilling the well.

BP started drilling in October, only to have the rig damaged by Hurricane Ida in early November. The company switched to a new rig, the Deepwater Horizon, and resumed drilling on Feb. 6. The rig was 43 days late for its next drilling location by the time it exploded April 20, costing BP at least $500,000 each day it was overdue, congressional documents show.

As BP found itself in a frantic race against time to get the job done, engineers took several time-saving measures, according to congressional investigators.

In the design of the well, the company apparently chose a riskier option among two possibilities to provide a barrier to the flow of gas in space surrounding steel tubes in the well, documents and internal e-mails show. The decision saved BP $7 million to $10 million; the original cost estimate for the well was about $96 million.

In an e-mail, BP engineer Brian Morel told a fellow employee that the company is likely to make last-minute changes in the well.
“We could be running it in 2-3 days, so need a relative quick response. Sorry for the late notice, this has been nightmare well which has everyone all over the place,” Morel wrote.

The e-mail chain culminated with the following message by another worker: “This has been a crazy well for sure.”

BP also apparently rejected advice of a subcontractor, Halliburton Inc., in preparing for a cementing job to close up the well. BP rejected Halliburton’s recommendation to use 21 “centralizers” to make sure the casing ran down the center of the well bore. Instead, BP used six centralizers.
In an e-mail on April 16, a BP official involved in the decision explained: “It will take 10 hours to install them. I do not like this.” Later that day, another official recognized the risks of proceeding with insufficient centralizers but commented: “Who cares, it’s done, end of story, will probably be fine.”

The lawmakers also said BP also decided against a nine- to 12-hour procedure known as a “cement bond log” that would have tested the integrity of the cement. A team from Schlumberger, an oil services firm, was on board the rig, but BP sent the team home on a regularly scheduled helicopter flight the morning of April 20.
Less than 12 hours later, the rig exploded.

BP also failed to fully circulate drilling mud, a 12-hour procedure that could have helped detect gas pockets that later shot up the well and exploded on the drilling rig.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/business/7065048.html[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=rlanasa;37492]Unless the US Federal Government comes forward with very clear terms on exactly what must be done to restart and continue drilling this means nothing and the GOM will stay closed. If they do not do that soon the rigs will be gone and the industry will never return.[/QUOTE]

How 'bout everybody just puts safety first and follows API best practices? That seems to have worked pretty well. Err on the side of safety, and step back from reservoirs and conditions where the risk exceeds the limits of experience and technology. It’s not like there are not lots of contractors and operato who have not successfully performed in this industry.

BP’s actions have pushed this all off on the government, the least equipped entity to guarantee safety and performance. The government does not dictate my morality; I do. (along with a little help from my mama and my wife and daughters.) If they lifted the ban on rape and murder tomorrow, it would not make me want to go out and commit those crimes. Blaming MMS for their impotent, tepid, and lax oversight of what happens in the patch is shifting responsibility from where it ultimately lies: with every person who sets foot in the oilfield, or in the back offices where it is run.

Thanks,
I appreciate the nod to me OldHondoHand for that OLD speculation of mine; that was so long ago, I was still trying to find out who was dead or alive then. I don’t know if I’m glad or not that I/they were wrong about the pressures in that initial post.
Even with all the work I’ve done with the company men on the deepwater fleet, and finding BP the worse to work with getting my GE equipment working while drilling, I never would have thought BP was capable of doing what they did.
Keep up the good work here everyone; I follow EVERYTHING on our forum: even now that I’m here in Argentina getting another GE rig going the right way. If anything comes up about the Drilling Drives I’ll chime in but we’re WAY past any suspicions there and I’m not on top of the floor past the joystick.
SHIT, I still can’t believe it happened; old age melancholy is tearing me up thinking back to those first few days.
On a happier note, it looks like the land work is really picking, a lot of confusion and canceled contracts in the GoM but that is it be expected considering who’s running this show.

[QUOTE=company man 1;37447]It looks like the LMRP cap got blown off & the well is flowing away from the well head all together. I know it was slugging sand, then gas, then oil real hard aroung 2:00 then at about 2:15 it blew the hell out of something. The BOP stack is still ther but the cap is gone & it didn’t go by design. a couple of the ROVs are gonna need major repairs.[/QUOTE]

Earlier today one of the ROVs (Boa Deep C - ROV2) was showing “Repair MeOH Hotstab” on the monitor. Since MeOH is methanol, maybe you saw the cap get plugged up with hydrates. Anyway, it looks like they’ve got the methanol hooked back up and going into the lower part of the BOP now.

[QUOTE=KASOL;37461]I am well aware of the Norsok D-010 since I work here in Norway. :slight_smile:

Edit: Table 22 Casing cement:
Requirement:
[B]Casing through hydrocarbon bearing formations: [/B]
Shall be defined based on requirements for zonal isolation. Cement should cover potential cross-flow
interval between different reservoir zones.
For cemented casing strings which are not drilled out, the height above a point of potential inflow/ leakage point / permeable formation with hydrocarbons,
shall be 200 m, or to previous casing shoe, whichever is less.

Qualification
The cement shall be verified through formation strength test when the casing shoe is drilled out. Alternatively the verification may be through exposing the
cement column for differential pressure from fluid column above cement in annulus. In the latter case the pressure integrity acceptance criteria and
verification requirements shall be defined.
2. The verification requirements for having obtained the minimum cement height
shall be described, which can be
• verification by logs (cement bond, temperature, LWD sonic), or
• estimation on the basis of records from the cement operation (volumes
pumped, returns during cementing, etc.).
3. The strength development of the cement slurry shall be verified through
observation of representative surface samples from the mixing cured under a
representative temperature and pressure. For HPHT wells such equipment
should be used on the rig site.[/QUOTE]

Readers might also be interested with - G.Failure Modes- last page, in the pdf document, links of which I posted to Kasol. The document read in its entirety will shed even more light on the issue of cement failure. http://www.npd.no/Global/Norsk/5%20-...dard_D-010.pdf

cm1. The Scandi Neptune, appears like, the flow is more than I have ever observed, but again, I can’t over react to something, I have no knowledge. Now it really looks like 100k barrels,Again, I don’t want to sound like an alarmis. If anyone from bp sees this, could you please give us some info?

[QUOTE=New Orleans Lady;37502]cm1. The Scandi Neptune, appears like, the flow is more than I have ever observed, but again, I can’t over react to something, I have no knowledge. Now it really looks like 100k barrels,Again, I don’t want to sound like an alarmis. If anyone from bp sees this, could you please give us some info?[/QUOTE]

I’m guessing the flow from underneath the cap that we see varies depending on how much oil they’re collecting top side. If they have to reduce the capture rate or stop it temporarily for maintenance. That’s the reason Obama and company wants BP to build in redundancy into the system so if one platform has to quit capturing oil/gas for some reason, another platform can hopefully take up the slack to minimize the amount of oil and gas going into the ocean.

It sounds like their next step is to unbolt the crimped riser flange and bolt on a new flange with a direct connection that they can connect to topside. Then hopefully we won’t see any oil coming out. And we won’t have anything to watch! Which is a good thing!

[QUOTE=champagne;37476]From the Press Briefing by Admiral Allen yesterday (6/21), when asked about erosion around the BOP:

Q: Do you have any signs that the—there’s erosion? In other words, that the existing containment gear, the blowout preventer, et cetera, are failing in any way that could lead to a larger and larger flow? In other words, that you could be chasing a moving target in terms of flow?

ADMIRAL ALLEN: Nothing that we’re familiar with at this point. [B]The entire arrangement is kind of listed a little bit. I think it’s 10 or 12 degrees off perpendicular[/B] so it’s not quite straight up. And that causes a little bit of a challenge in sealing this containment cap in the rubber seals around it.
But none that I’m aware of, but we will double check that. If there’s any change to that, we’ll make an announcement by tomorrow. But I think—I don’t think we have any indication that’s going on.

[I]Full transcript at Joint Information Center[/I][/QUOTE]

Sounds like the question of BOP leaning/movement caught them on the hop.

10-12 degrees is more than a little bit!

[QUOTE=alvis;37503]I’m guessing the flow from underneath the cap that we see varies depending on how much oil they’re collecting top side. If they have to reduce the capture rate or stop it temporarily for maintenance. That’s the reason Obama and company wants BP to build in redundancy into the system so if one platform has to quit capturing oil/gas for some reason, another platform can hopefully take up the slack to minimize the amount of oil and gas going into the ocean.

It sounds like their next step is to unbolt the crimped riser flange and bolt on a new flange with a direct connection that they can connect to topside. Then hopefully we won’t see any oil coming out. And we won’t have anything to watch! Which is a good thing![/QUOTE]

Thad’s briefing today: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/06/22/1694888/transcript-of-adm-thad-allens.html

  1. They have recovered the 40’ section of the riser they snipped off earlier. Maybe we will find out if there are two fishes inside it…and what they are. Or maybe they won’t tell us.
  2. They are bringing in a new vessel to hook up to the kill line and recover from there, increasing their “production” capacity to 53l/bbls/day.
  3. Hurricane season is a real issue with this effort.
  4. The Admiral dodges the “worst case scenario” question.

I hope they allow our men to work on the rigs in the GoM,because I think we know the problem,and the solution,; should have been resolved, by now, since it was Human Error,and they can cetainly resolve these issues, while our men are working. Why should our families, have to suffer because of poor judgement calls, and poor leadership? It should not take 6 mos. to resolve this,with what we know. We do not have the time, for the traditional processes, to take place. And, I hope we have advisors, looking over the shoulders of BP’s decision making, because BP is like the BOP we had on the Horizon. < and I m just your ave Joe<Jo anne>.observing this. <crap, CMI,Lets go gettim,I m ready, along with the rest of us here. I m a great cook, too>

[QUOTE=OldHondoHand;37507]Thad’s briefing today: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/06/22/1694888/transcript-of-adm-thad-allens.html

  1. They have recovered the 40’ section of the riser they snipped off earlier. Maybe we will find out if there are two fishes inside it…and what they are. Or maybe they won’t tell us.
  2. They are bringing in a new vessel to hook up to the kill line and recover from there, increasing their “production” capacity to 53l/bbls/day.
  3. Hurricane season is a real issue with this effort.
  4. The Admiral dodges the “worst case scenario” question.[/QUOTE]

We can hope for transparency in identifying the riser fish!

It sounds like they’re thinking outside the box when he mentions something that was brought up in a brainstorming session. If for some reason the relief wells fail, they’re looking into seeing if they could utilize existing pipeline along the bottom of the ocean to route oil from the Macondo well to either a production facility or to another well in a different reservoir that’s not being used for production. Which he says would eliminate the requirement of a service vessel to be there. Especially during a hurricane.

Alf , read T allen’s briefing from today,I will sleep good tonite, as it appears , we are moving forward, sooner than later.QUOTE=Alf;37506]Sounds like the question of BOP leaning/movement caught them on the hop.

10-12 degrees is more than a little bit![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=New Orleans Lady;37473]cptdrillersails, I would have thought the same , with regards to Shell Oil., however, with the reckless way, Shell acted, with their acitivity in the Nigeria spill, that tells me these companies, will get away with whatever, they can, even though, they “know better”. Like the saying goes, " when the cats away, the mouse will play".[/QUOTE]

Exactly, but it’s also true that “If you play with fire, you’re going to get burned”. Let them pay for damages first, and afterward hit them with the punitive stuff. In the meantime, those exhibiting gross negligence go to jail, and even if their superiors don’t get nailed they get banned from the industry as well as publicly hung out to dry. Just like BP is ultimately responsible for the spill, superiors are responsible for the actions of those they supervise. I want them all, not just the few who were pressured into their bad decisions. Make this a lesson the industry won’t forget.

[QUOTE=BLISTERS;37497]Readers might also be interested with - G.Failure Modes- last page, in the pdf document, links of which I posted to Kasol. The document read in its entirety will shed even more light on the issue of cement failure. http://www.npd.no/Global/Norsk/5%20-…dard_D-010.pdf[/QUOTE]

Blisters your link did not appear to work for me. Could you take a look at it to ensure it copied ok into your message? All the best, BigMoose

Edit: Link fine 24 hours later… likely problem on my ISP/side.

I wanted to share a couple of pictures I had taken at the public boat ramp in Port Fourchon in Louisiana last week.

[ATTACH]991[/ATTACH][ATTACH]992[/ATTACH]

Couldn’t forget the sunset over the marsh!

[ATTACH]993[/ATTACH]

blisters, I had the same problem, but I thought it was me,<smile> Alvis , what a beautiful picture, I hope you frame them. "Horray, for the Crane’’!..I bet he’s thinking…"Look what these, dumb asses, did to my back yard’’

[QUOTE=bigmoose;37514]Blisters your link did not appear to work for me. Could you take a look at it to ensure it copied ok into your message? All the best, BigMoose[/QUOTE]

http://www.npd.no/Global/Norsk/5%20-%20Regelverk/Skjema/Brønnregistrering/Norsok_standard_D-010.pdf This link works fine at my end of town.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]994[/ATTACH][QUOTE=New Orleans Lady;37508]I hope they [B]allow our men to work on the rigs in the GoM[/B],[B]because I think we know the problem,and the solution[/B],; should have been resolved, by now, [B]since it was Human Error[/B],and they can cetainly resolve these issues, while our men are working. Why should our families, have to suffer because of poor judgement calls, and poor leadership? It should not take 6 mos. to resolve this,with what we know. [B]We do not have the time, for the traditional processes, to take place[/B]. And, I hope we have advisors, looking over the shoulders of BP’s decision making, because BP is like the BOP we had on the Horizon. < and I m just your ave Joe<Jo anne>.observing this. <crap, CMI,Lets go gettim,I m ready, along with the rest of us here. I m a great cook, too>[/QUOTE]

who cares, it’s done, we’ll probably be fine…???

[QUOTE=GunsnHoses;37458]I know this thread has jumped the shark, but pull-ease, CM, lets try and keep the tinfoil hat stuff down, OK?

Enterprise ROV 2 [I]clearly[/I] shows the cap in place at 9:45 EDT 2010-06-22.

Well it wasn’t firmly in place between 2:00 & 4:00 this morning. In fact it blew off the top of the stack. Make a tin foil reference when you go back & review tape between those times.