[QUOTE=kearns;41246]With all of the hoopla out there on the web regarding Well A and Well B, and whether or not the second well was ever started etc. Is is possible that the reason behind the two relief wells being drilled is so that one can be used to kill Well A and one to kill Well B? The wells are allegedly only 120’ apart. Do any of you experts out there consign to the theory that Well B exploded, and Well A is still leaking, or vice versa? Also, has there been any mention of this in the investigation hearings?
p.s. I miss CompanyMan1. I would really like to hear his theory on this.[/QUOTE] kearns , please read ALF’s post 5417 There is only one well.