A quick skim through your selective references draws me to one conclusion; parts of the arctic are warmer than normal.
So what?
Bits of the earth are warmer or colder or no different from previous years. But the fact that the arctic is a bit warmer isn’t, of itself, proof that the warming was caused by humans, but that seems to be the conclusion they both draw which you then extend to a “solution” of stopping or reducing oil and gas production.
None of that follows logical argument. There are no proper scientific studies linking occasionally warmer weather (not climate which is weather observations averaged over decades) with human activity.
You should be drilling and burning oil and gas … and coal for the simple purpose of efficiently generating useful, cheap energy and allowing others to do so too.
Or just enjoy a warm summer because next year it will probably be freezing.
Skimmed milk is just the watery part, after the important parts have been separated out.
Let’s hear what you have learnt AFTER you have read through the material I presented.
I will have learnt nothing of importance. These articles are dime-a-dozen on every climate alarmist site everywhere. They show no proof their warm weather observations have anything to do with humans and therefore their solution of eliminating hydrocarbons will produce a magically Goldilocks-like, not too hot, not too cold, but just right world. It’s fairy tale stuff.
