In the IBS system where there is a control station, that works as a centralised unit, if radar scanner is not working, malfunctioning or radar processor is not functioning then it won’t record the datas neither in the hard disk of radar nor in the control station server as the main source of data is cut-off. Radar input also will not go to ECDIS. Similarly for the ECDIS. If Processor is not working or executable file is corrupted the datas won’t get recorded in any of the storage device. So what the regulation says about it?
I think you just said “if it’s broken it doesn’t work”, which is certainly true. Seems to me the answer in that case would be to fix it.
No radar and no ECDIS are both no-sail items.
Yes, that is in the cases where there is no IBS but all the navigational equipments are installed on board the vessel. I am asking in the context of IBS. The very purpose of installing IBS is diluted when the redundancy of data storage is not ensured when situation arises as I explained in my post…
Ow, you hurt my head.
My ears hurt from the constant ringing of alarms from ibs. See huge class action suit in the future for hearing loss in bridge crews and pilots.
Reported in our local newspaper today:
Source: Vard Electro har tatt steget inn i cruisemarkedet - smp.no
Vard’s press release:
I am not sure I understand the question and the problem.
But may be this will help.
Above should be in theory and in practice. How it really works one needs to experience a failure at sea and pray to have a very good ETO on board who will figure out what technicians screwed during original instalation , set up and booting.
If one radar scanner is not working , that is the least of my worries. I switch into "master /slave " mode and continue happily to next port and call service. Loss of radar input into ECDIS , then I could not care less as i hate the clutter. Always thought that filtering data flow into separate items is better then cramming it into one crazy one screen data overflow which is more confusing then helping.
But that is my opinion .Some think differently. What fails I can see on “nautocon” screen and what data is sent to VDR most see only after accident .
Asking tech dpt how to access HD w/o damaging anything, the standard answer is: WTF are U talking about , do not touch it , leave it and they will flood you with tons of requests to feed the paper tiger so you have no time to have stupid ideas and tinker with IBS.
Which question and what problem 
It is just an article about a new and innovative Integrated Bridge System and the press release from the developer and supplier of equipment.
The basic SeaQ Bridge has been around since 2017:
Have another coffee Dr.Bugge., 
I was talking to @GyroMeda
Reagrding yours I am not in salesman & advertising busness .I was untill 2024 in " user " business
and resolution MSC 64/67 was adopted in 1996
Would be nice if you indicated that. 
I am sorry .Pls accept my humble apologies.