More on this subject. Dire warning.
For anyone interested.
Here in the US it’s primarily the right.
If you had bothered to read the actual Mueller Report you’d know it wasn’t nothing.
I think it’s fair to say we now know that Mueller had nothing to investigate therefore anything in his report was irrelevant.
It’s not fair to say that because we don’t know that. In fact, we know the opposite, as the investigation found.
Were you asleep? Everybody else knows that.
The investigation found nothing.
A bunch of people who didn’t bother read the report were convinced that’s the case by liars.
Wrong.
The investigation that came from the party that invented the evidence then had all arms of the judiciary agreeing that the manufactured evidence was true so they could get wire taps on the potential candidates.
Worse than any 3rd world
And you say the right is trying to stay in power…lol
They werent in power when this conspiracy was invented
The Mueller Report is a little over 400 pages and not hard to read if one is interested in what was found. There are not a lot of really big words so it’s easy to understand. ![]()
Fox and Breitbart never reported on the bipartisan Senate investigation into the matter. it’s easy to find. There is an entire Wikipedia article on it. Why have they never mentioned it?
A bipartisan investigation, as in, both Republicans and Democrats signed off on the findings. And by Republicans I mean senators like Marco Rubio. Rubio–the guy on the president’s cabinet today–was the committee head. He said at the time, "No probe into this matter has been more exhaustive.”
Here’s from the Wiki, and when you read this remember Secretary of State Marco Rubio is telling you this is the final word:
“The Committee report found that the Russian government had engaged in an “extensive campaign” to sabotage the election in favor of Donald Trump, which included assistance from some of Trump’s own advisers.[7]
“Like the Mueller report that preceded it, the report does not find a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, but it does go further than the Mueller report in detailing the many suspicious links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies. In particular, it describes Paul Manafort as “a grave counterintelligence threat”.
“According to the report, “some evidence suggests” that Konstantin Kilimnik, to whom Manafort provided polling data, was directly connected to the Russian theft of Clinton-campaign emails.[9][10] In addition, while Trump’s written testimony in the Mueller report stated that he did not recall speaking with Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, the Senate report concludes that “Trump did, in fact, speak with Stone about WikiLeaks and with members of his Campaign about Stone’s access to WikiLeaks on multiple occasions.”[11]
Mueller was appointed by Trump’s DOJ so the “investigation” was done by Republicans.
Yes, at is plainly evident by the extreme Gerrymandering and attempted voter suppression. Hell, Trump didn’t like having a slim majority in the House so ordered Texas to Gerrymander mid census and invent Republican more seats.
Including Mr. Barr who issued a summary that Mr. Mueller said misrepresented his findings.
To investigate evidence concocted by the DNC and Hillary Clinton through cut-outs.
But now that former FBI Director, James Comey has been indicted for lying to congress, we are perhaps on the way to resolving many more issues. The Steele dossier comes to mind as the basis of claims of Trump’s Russia, Russia, Russia collusion. That was acted on by Comey leading to Mueller.
I don’t have enough popcorn.
No evidence of any such concoction has been uncovered though.
That must have been a Rip Van Winkle-length snooze you’ve been having.
You won’t need much, a tea cup should last you.![]()
Do you have the internet?
its everywhere
TDS blinkers on