# CBP could scrap Jones Act revision

**URL:** <https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305>\
**Category:** Maritime Law\
**Created:** [September 18, 2009, 4:57am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305 "2009-09-18T04:57:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mikey](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.gcaptain.com/mikey/32/14_2.png) [@Mikey](https://forum.gcaptain.com/u/Mikey)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2009, 4:57am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305/1 "2009-09-18T04:57:56Z")

</div>

CUSTOMS & Border Protection will soon withdraw a proposal to bring US  
offshore workboats under the Jones Act, an attorney working closely on  
the issue told Fairplay today.

CBP officials were not immediately available for comment, but the  
attorney said the agency will be “withdrawing what they did and starting  
over”, possibly with a revamped proposal.

The customs proposal would have reversed more than three decades of  
precedents on foreign-flag workboats serving the US offshore oil and gas  
drilling industry.

The changes would have meant that transport of undersea infrastructure  
used in deepwater oil extraction would be subject to Jones Act  
restrictions - requiring use of vessels built and flagged in the US.

That plan was hailed by the Offshore Marine Service Association as a  
means of gaining back US jobs lost to foreign competitors. OMSA  
president Ken Wells declined comment to Fairplay on reports that the  
initial CBP plan would be scuttled until he “saw any new proposal in  
writing”.

An official withdrawal notice is expected 1 October, with public  
confirmation of the reversal by CBP foreseen “in the near future”, the  
attorney source told Fairplay.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![seadawg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3da27b/32.png) [@seadawg](https://forum.gcaptain.com/u/seadawg)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2009, 7:23am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305/2 "2009-09-18T07:23:43Z")

</div>

bummer for a hummer…sounds like some “hard core” lobbying went on with the lights out in the back offices of the CBP…oh well…they almost had all those foreign vessels on the run…guess the companies impacted will “shit can” all the applications they collected!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GOMariner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/ebca7d/32.png) [@GOMariner](https://forum.gcaptain.com/u/GOMariner)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2009, 9:07am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305/3 "2009-09-18T09:07:36Z")

</div>

Time to start a letter writing campaign to our reps . If you take a boat or rig overseas the country you you are working wants to put persons from thier country onboard why are we not requiring it here . The company posts letters from the Coast Guard stating they are looking for persons from the US to fill the billet years later they are still looking .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jones\_Act](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ea666f/32.png) [@Jones\_Act](https://forum.gcaptain.com/u/Jones_Act)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2009, 2:47am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305/4 "2009-09-19T02:47:51Z")

</div>

> [@GOMariner;18353](#):
>
> Time to start a letter writing campaign to our reps . If you take a boat or rig overseas the country you you are working wants to put persons from thier country onboard why are we not requiring it here . The company posts letters from the Coast Guard stating they are looking for persons from the US to fill the billet years later they are still looking .

We have been doing this for over6 months. Please spread the word! Go to [http://www.JonesActQuestions.com](http://www.JonesActQuestions.com) and hit the Action Alert button in the top right. This will allow you to send a pre-made letter to your Rep, Senators, Pres. O’Bama and the Admiral of the USCG. Steve Gordon

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sneefers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9d8465/32.png) [@Sneefers](https://forum.gcaptain.com/u/Sneefers)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2009, 4:26pm UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305/5 "2009-10-04T16:26:44Z")

</div>

[quote=Mikey;18348]

An official withdrawal notice is expected 1 October, with public  
confirmation of the reversal by CBP foreseen “in the near future”, the  
attorney source told Fairplay.[/quote]

Has this transpired? I have been looking to see if this has gone thru as expected or if it was part of the rumor mill.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sharp21](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ba8739/32.png) [@Sharp21](https://forum.gcaptain.com/u/Sharp21)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 2:37am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305/6 "2009-10-05T02:37:44Z")

</div>

Yes the proposal has been withdrawn.  
S.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jones\_Act](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ea666f/32.png) [@Jones\_Act](https://forum.gcaptain.com/u/Jones_Act)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 7:33am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/cbp-could-scrap-jones-act-revision/2305/7 "2009-10-05T07:33:44Z")

</div>

Dear All-

We have changed (Today) the Alert Letter. We have now added the acting Director of the U.S. Customs & Border and re-worded the Action Alert letter. I urge you to re-send the letter and to get others to fill it out as well as we only have this service for about 3 months more. The link is here: [http://capwiz.com/jonesactquestions/issues/alert/?alertid=13158001&PROCESS=Take+Action](http://capwiz.com/jonesactquestions/issues/alert/?alertid=13158001&PROCESS=Take+Action)

Steve Gordon

ps- Please join [JonesActQuestions.com](http://JonesActQuestions.com) as well while you are at it and we will send you are quarterly eNewsletter outlining the recent maritime law decisions as well as updates on the ingoing saga of the Save Our Seamen Campaign.
