Every year my staff prepares a book of statistics for the company. About a 100 pages. Some things are company specific, like number of voyages, hours worked, man/days of operation, fuel burned, number of injuries, etc.
A lot is government statistics, such as unemployment rate (national and local), CPI (national and western states), etc. I need the data because I set the annual budgets for our Fleet. In order to predict what the budget will be for the following year I need accurate data from the present year.
Example: We have 30 years of data comparing our turnover rate and the National unemployment rate as provided by BLS. There is a relationship between the two, and we use the data to predict what staffing will be like. I can correlate all this with number of employment applications received, which we also track: a good cross check of the unemployment numbers.
We compare the average company wage of our ABs to the average household income in the Western states, from Census data. The ratio between the two strongly determines what competitive AB pay will be in the U.S. so we watch it with interest, and we understand how the data is collected.
There was some hot discussion in 2022 about the rate of inflation, and whether the CPI is to be trusted. Well, I didnât need to guess, because my staff gives me an annual report on the changes of our expenditures in food, deck supplies, engine room supplies, air fares, etc., much of it rendered in a man/day basis. As I said I need that data because I set the budgets for all of these things and wages each year, and I need accurate data.
Guess what. The CPI is quite accurate. But then the CPI is not inflation. Two different things.
Most of the data I get is from the BLS, and unlike most people I have an active interest in its accuracy. And unlike most people I have the ability to independently verify some of the data.
Unlike most people too I hire people and then run annual reports on the numbers. And even with only this company there is nothing simple about it. You could look at just one mariner and make a convincing case that he stopped working here in 2024 or 2025. The determination takes thought to work out, and the discipline to report bad news as well as good.
Is the dock worker who transferred to the fleet for two voyages then went back to dock work to be counted as a mariner or not at all? Now multiply all that ambiguity by a workforce of 165 million people and tell me the methodology is simple.
So what part of the conversation am I not understanding? Iâll tell you which one: the one on cable news shows, because I never listen to those conversations. Cable news is meth for outrage junkies.