# AMO/MEBA circling MMP? APL news **URL:** \ **Category:** Professional Mariner Forum\ **Created:** [June 14, 2025, 10:24am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/amo-meba-circling-mmp-apl-news/72796 "2025-06-14T10:24:43Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 108
**Author:** ![Quetzalcoatlus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/3bc359/32.png) [@Quetzalcoatlus](https://forum.gcaptain.com/u/Quetzalcoatlus)\ **Post date:** [June 28, 2025, 11:05am UTC](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/amo-meba-circling-mmp-apl-news/72796/108 "2025-06-28T11:05:06Z")
Once again, you have not accurately explained how you justify being so upset over the issue. A group of employees themselves reached out to MMP and said they want to be represented by MMP, not MEBA. Am I correct in assuming you think MMP should have told the ATC/OSG people to pound sand because MEBA was already involved? It’s unfair to MEBA? Well would that have been fair for the workers? If the worker’s voice isn’t supposed to be the dominant factor in a unionization process, then what is? In other words, screw what the workers themselves want and don’t listen to the voice of the workers. Workers wanted MMP on the ballot…mmp should have said sorry can’t do it? These aren’t supposed to be crewing agencies. These are supposed to be organizations elected _by the workers_ to represent them for their rights. _The workers_ contacted MMP, said they _want_ MMP, and eventually _voted for_ MMP. I look forward to your explanation/reply, but we should also get back on topic with APL/Osprey. I am sorry if we digressed a little too much. Just can’t see how it’s justified to get upset at MMP. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/amo-meba-circling-mmp-apl-news/72796)._