The average cost per heavy icebreaker is estimated to be $791 million, but the cost of each ship goes down as each is built. Research and testing expenses drive up the cost of the first ship to an estimated $983 million, but down to $692 million for the final ship, Van Rynbach said.
What the hell? Are these ships made from gold? An a380 airliner only costs ~$320 million.
Sorry, I was not aware that both you and the KH was in Bergen.
Here is the best I can do to compensate: https://fiskeribladet.no/nyheter/?artikkel=57690
The video concentrate more on what interest the journalist than on what be of interest to you.
PS> I assume you can understand spoken Norwegian enough to where you get the spoken comments as well?
She’ll be going to Langstein in Tomrefjorden for last bit of outfitting and commissioning before final delivery, which MAY include a visit to Aalesund. I’ll try to visit, or at least get some external pictures of my own.
As ombugge posts progress on the Norwegian icebreaker, here’s what’s happening on the other side of the Iron Curtain (articles in Russian, pictures in English):
That’s three icebreakers in total:
two vessels with 21.5 MW (28,800 shp) propulsion power, conventional AC/AC, 2 m/6.5 ft icebreaking capability and ice class roughly equivalent to Polar Class 2; and
one vessel with 12 MW (16,000 shp) propulsion power, Onboard DC Grid, 1.5 m/5 ft icebreaking capability and ice class roughly equivalent to Polar Class 3.
All ships are scheduled to be delivered this year, the first two to Gazprom Neft and the third to Atomflot. All will be deployed in the Gulf of Ob in the Russian Arctic to support oil and LNG shipping.
Thanks Tupsis, and I’m glad you at least got the pics in english!! I’d bet with the NW passage opening up this new construction is prompted by that a little bit. There was talk the USA should have another breaker, a, (ahem) newer one, The NW passage WILL be used and probably a lot but i’d suspect mostly by russia? I think some forward thinkers in the Govt. are urging we have some capability to go there in ice? China is building the Rail Road from china to Europe, in fact, it’s done but they are re-doing a lot of it and adding a lot so maybe their xocean traffic will lessen?
Russia exports all of its hydrocarbons along the Northern Sea Route (Northeast Passage) along its own coast so it has no need for NWP. The icebreakers I listed above are designed for local operations such as ice management around the Arctic Gates offshore oil export terminal or port icebreaking at the Sabetta LNG terminal. The tankers used for these operations can operate independently without icebreaker assistance for most part of the year or, if necessary, follow nuclear-powered “line icebreakers” in convoys.
The USCG does not do conventional escort icebreaking (USCGC Healy’s adventures off Nome were a notable exception); the primary mission of the current and future heavy polar icebreakers is Operation Deep Freeze in Antarctica, followed by scientific and constabulary missions in the Arctic. Certainly, if shipping moves to the Arctic and the NWP, the USCG should have the capability to be present there.
Lo and behold. The new R/V Kronprins Haakon is a “rust bucket” according to some who have spotted rust streaks on the anchor and under a hatch at the bow: https://www.skipsrevyen.no/rustflekker-pa-kronprins-haakon/
She has just completed a delivery trip from the yard in Italy to Norway in harsh winter conditions.
Maybe the comments are coloured of the fact that the ship was built in Italy, not in Norway??
As the article says, Ilya Muromets turned out to be too expensive so they won’t build more of them. Instead, they’ll look to a smaller variant dubbed Project P21180M which will have about two thirds of the displacement of the auxiliary icebreaker they now commissioned.
As for Sibir and the other big ones under construction, it’s now been ten years since Russia commissioned a new heavy polar icebreaker and the last one took 18 years to complete. Everything that is now under construction is seriously behind schedule.